Tobermory

Southgate was sacked when we were a point off the top, in 4th place, after a 2-0 win.

What do the (+1) and (+2) mean?

What the heck does Coulson have to do to get a go at LWB?

Yes you're right. Argentina won their first 4 games then got beat by Germany, that obviously means the system they played was wrong. My mistake.

"Bielsa has often converted midfielders into versatile defenders, and a prime example of this was the 2010 World Cup. He used Waldo Ponce as a dominant central defender and slotted two quick defensive-minded midfielders either side of him in Gonzalo Jara and Gary Medel."

If Tav is playing RWB I can't see him being benched for Roberts, who is certainly not going to play there.

---------------------------Bettinelli ----------------Dijksteel - Fry - McNair Spence - Morsy - Tavernier - Saville - Coulson --------------------Fletcher - Akpom

There are some who believe he has been less awful at LWB. But at LB he was directly responsible for at least 2 goals conceded, but my memory is awful so there could be way more.

Didn't he play Johnson at left-back in those games and wasn't he awful?

1- yes 2 - no 3 - both ways are fine. It's whether you put jam or cream on first that really matters.

Would anyone take Howson or Britt, considering the current financial situation? From the article above, when he says someone who can change things, that sounds like a 'Roberts' type player. If we could get someone like that in on loan and see where we are in January, the window will have been okay.

Other than Britt, who is on high wages?

Maybe even Coulson will get a game

If fans can't go back, will there be some leeway with FFP rules to allow more investment to stop clubs from going bust?

But is 433 better than 352? Do we have the players for 433? Johnson is ineffective at LWB and terrible at LB. Where would Roberts play in 433? Would that mean we only played one of our strikers rather than two, and how is that better?