Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

The Summer/Autumn transfers thread 2020 aka TURN DOWN FOR WHAT(more)


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TLF10 said:

It was 7m rising to 10m and i cant imagine any of the add ons have now not been achieved.

It was barely £7M after all add ons. It was absolutely nowhere near 10 million, although I’m sure the club are more than happy for people to believe that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 14.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  •  

    736

  •  

    686

  •  

    538

  •  

    451

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi guys! PAOK fan here from Greece. You are getting a really hard worker in Akpom. He is a top lad and a good professional. When he first came, he was considered a bench player. It was the 2018-19 sea

Morsy nearly done

Williams fee nearly agreed. 1.75million rising to 2.5 (So 1.75 then 😂).

Posted Images

I wonder if Liam Delap will be available for loan once Aguero and Jesus are fully fit? If we are going for a young lad from the premier league he could be a shout.

I’m not aware of anything doing though, hopefully it will pick up now NW is back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, CrazyL said:

It was barely £7M after all add ons. It was absolutely nowhere near 10 million, although I’m sure the club are more than happy for people to believe 

Are you claiming to have itk info on this deal? I am sure the fee was disclosed as part of clubs accounts

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, TLF10 said:

Are you claiming to have itk info on this deal? I am sure the fee was disclosed as part of clubs accounts

Well if it’s been disclosed (by the club) and is in the public domain then post it up. I’m very happy to be proved wrong. It’s not unusual for selling clubs to add the fee received from the buying club to the money saved on the players wages over the remainder of  the contract (had he stayed) and say the deal was worth the sum of the two ie in a deal ‘worth’ £10m, 6.5m + 0.5m in add ons to buy the players registration, and £3m saved on wages which we no longer have to pay = £10m. It makes the fans feel better that they haven’t just sold a top player on the cheap.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, DevKWat said:

At the time £10m was good money for Bamford. However, considering we turned down bigger offers for Britt is baffling to me. Every aspect of Bamford's game is and was better than Britt when he was here. 

No it wasn’t he was obviously our best striker and we should have done everything to keep him. We paid £15m for Britt who isn’t as good.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CrazyL said:

Well if it’s been disclosed (by the club) and is in the public domain then post it up. I’m very happy to be proved wrong. It’s not unusual for selling clubs to add the fee received from the buying club to the money saved on the players wages over the remainder of  the contract (had he stayed) and say the deal was worth the sum of the two ie in a deal ‘worth’ £10m, 6.5m + 0.5m in add ons to buy the players registration, and £3m saved on wages which we no longer have to pay = £10m. It makes the fans feel better that they haven’t just sold a top player on the cheap.

honestly never heard of club adding the wage saved from the sold player to transfer fee recived, have you got any evidence that this happens? genuinely curious

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...