The fact they didnât train is simply they hadnât implanted a risk and migration. Lots of alternatives to train. We where not down to only 10 players as there were several who could have played. What it does highlight is that a sick player is better then those not in the team selection or sat on the bench. Hell if thatâs the case we are dire trouble.Â
It matters not because the onus was on us which is what Iâm implying and as I stated my opinion, we are a inconsistent team  doing well.Â
@ScarBoro I think they've (Gov website) published Employment Tribunals decisions upto 15th Jan. So we have a few days to wait but it'll be interesting to read the initial full decision.
The two are at least partly linked though. If you are dismissed, the dismissal may be unfair because legislation doesnât allow for dismissal in those circumstances (e.g. because if you are dismissed for getting pregnant or undertaking trade union activities) or because your employment contract doesnât allow for it. Alternatively, the dismissal may be unfair because although the end result was correct, the employer didnât follow the rules correctly (e.g. you didnât get the chance to appeal or the timescales in your contract werenât followed). In these cases the tribunal can decide you were correctly dismissed but award compensation for the company not following the rules correctly - but the compensation in these cases will be pretty small.Â
Given the amount the tribunal awarded,  they are saying the dismissal should not have happened I.e. Derby had no legal grounds for dismissing him for the âoffenceâÂ
Create an account or log in to oneBoro to join in the discussion with likeminded Boro fans, receive great conversations to your inbox, personalise your oneBoro experience, and follow discussions that you love.