Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Smogzilla

The Summer/Autumn transfers thread 2020 aka TURN DOWN FOR WHAT(more)

Recommended Posts

Regarding Bamford, a lot of our fans were happy with ~£10 million that was suggested at the time and even the majority of Leeds fans last season were saying how good that deal was for us with them overpaying. Ok now with the benefit of hindsight he has started in PL very well so it’s easy for everyone to do a 180. Still a long time left and I’m sure it won’t be long before Leeds are demanding a more high profile striker ... again 

Edited by FamilyBoro
Guess it’s 180 not 360 :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't hindsight, Bamford was clearly the best striker at the club except for one reason or another Pulis refused to accept it. When he got a run in the side it was Bamford's goals that fired us into the Play Offs that Pulis then surrendered in a spineless two legged embarrassment. I'd be interested to know if there was anything in Pulis's contract that saw him benefit from cash raised from sales. 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, estonpidge said:

@Tom   Selling Bamford wasn't the ridiculous idea, buying Britt was when we already had Bamford.

Perhaps the second part of your statement is true, but that doesn't change the fact that selling Bamford when we did was a huge misstep, both at the time and in hindsight.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FamilyBoro said:

Regarding Bamford, a lot of our fans were happy with ~£10 million that was suggested at the time and even the majority of Leeds fans last season were saying how good that deal was for us with them overpaying. Ok now with the benefit of hindsight he has started in PL very well so it’s easy for everyone to do a 360. Still a long time left and I’m sure it won’t be long before Leeds are demanding a more high profile striker ... again 

I don't remember a lot of people being happy with it to be honest. Bamford was a player we courted after he left after his first loan spell because we knew what he was capable of and still expected he could make it at the top level. I know that, despite the fact he didn't solve our issues in the Prem, having him in the squad going into the Championship and having him as part of our own long-term future was huge for some people, myself included. I thought Bamford and Middlesbrough were going to be synonymous for the rest of his career, we had finally got him where he needed to be to succeed after those 3 failed loan spells where he didn't get much of a chance.

Leeds of all places, bloody Leeds, to sell him for £10m, we didn't even make that much profit on him and we were left with undoubtedly the worse of our 2 main strikers going into that season. Pulis had to stumble on him as a striking option the season before, after playing him left-wing for a few games and expecting him to come good... then he showed the best of what he's capable of in a short spell up front, went on a run of scoring goals. Next season comes and we couldn't get rid of him quick enough. Pulis claims it was him that wanted to go and hell, if it was, who can bloody blame him? The man didn't appreciate what he brought to us and a team that had just hired a world renowned manager wanted him on board. Bielsa had his critics at the time, there were plenty who thought he wouldn't last 5 minutes as he seemed to jump around from one job to another if not everything went his way. But I suspect Bamford would rather 5 minutes with Bielsa than another second with Pulis.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Tom not disagreeing with you, just saying why spend £15m + wages when we already had a striker who could get us promoted, the money could have been used on bringing in a decent manager in the first place to evolve AK's squad not start again.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OzzyPorter said:

Bamford demanded assurances that he would be first choice when fit. he never got them. He then, through his representatives, engineered a move away. This is how it went from start to finish of his exit process.

No it isn’t. We accepted an offer for him and he was basically forced out by Pulis and Bausor.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Changing Times said:

On the basis of?

Free transfer.

Pace to burn,  very tricky,  can play anywhere across the front but is primarily a winger.

Young.

I dont think we have anyone like this.

 

For me, its a no brainer if the wages are within budget.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TheJew said:

Free transfer.

Pace to burn,  very tricky,  can play anywhere across the front but is primarily a winger.

Young.

I dont think we have anyone like this.

 

For me, its a no brainer if the wages are within budget.

Doesn't have the best of stats, but I suppose he wouldn't be without a club if he had. Only just turned 22 so plenty of time to improve, and as you say will add some of the stuff that we are really missing. Clearly we don't have the finances to buy someone with higher quality, but we could probably do a lot worse than Green. With the leagues up and running I'm sure his demands will have dropped to a more acceptable level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, uncle_rico said:

Akpom has just started following Green on twitter. Mind you so has Gestede 

We do need a 4th striker....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TheJew said:

Free transfer.

Pace to burn,  very tricky,  can play anywhere across the front but is primarily a winger.

Young.

I dont think we have anyone like this.

 

For me, its a no brainer if the wages are within budget.

Are you talking about Marcus Browne? Lol only joking. I’d like Greene here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BoroSmoggie said:

Are you talking about Marcus Browne? Lol only joking. I’d like Greene here.

Browne looks best in the middle though if you ask me. Even in centre mid. He isnt really a tricky winger imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Browne should be competing against Tav for his place in the team. Surprised he’s not been tried there yet because Tav’s form has dropped since end of last season. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • Merson, Gazza, Maradona and Best had their demons but were brilliant players. Jones is immature and has little natural talent to compensate for his indiscretions. Not much correlation between him and the others, IMO, and very little reason for us to spend money we don't appear to have on him.
    • He was banned from driving after a dangerous piece of driving around Glasgow which showed his decision making isn't particularly clever not to mention being irresponsible and selfish with scant regard to others. Thankfully he didn't kill anyone like others in the profession before him have. It's sad that the likes of Merson, Gazza, Maradona and Best etc. all had their demons but were still able to perform and function, the majority crash and burn, destroying their careers in the process.
    • Until we realise whatever another club is prepared to pay for them we can only estimate what we think their value is worth. McNair wasn't cheap and until this season he looked just about OK for the money we spent. We spent a million pounds Goalkeeper now out on loan replacing him with a nomad in footballing terms (Stoj is still on the books but not in the squad). Then there was the ridiculous fee paid for Saville (not his fault nor Britt's come to that). If you think that the squad isn't decreasing in value then you are entitled to your opinion but I only see a downwards trend. The sale of Bamford probably was the defining reality from which we haven't altered direction then we have Randolph's replacement who wasn't to the same monetary value (or ability). Without doubt we have some good prospects but that doesn't alter that we are now trying to buy cheap and sell high as oppose to years of buying high and selling low. I haven't a problem with following that business model, it's how we existed for decades before SG arrived, selling the likes of Souness, Mills, Johnson and later on Pallister etc. but to me the value trend of our squad is a diminishing one.
    • He was banned for 7 matches after attending a party, he's not even made the bench since. Before that he'd finally got back in to the side and scored. He's burned his bridges, but it's not just down to ability. Funny thing is, dozens of players have done the same thing in the top flight in England and gotten away with it without punishment.
    • I don't think Jones has the ability at this level so I wouldn't want to bring him back. Then the off field issues that led to him leaving Boro in the first place don't seem to have improved any at Rangers. We have had some of the best from the Old Firm that seriously struggled down here before in the Championship. That he can't even force his way into Gerrard's thinking tells me where his future level is.
×
×
  • Create New...