Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

The Summer/Autumn transfers thread 2020 aka TURN DOWN FOR WHAT(more)


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, CrazyL said:

Reading also sold their ground to themselves.

FFS another one?

Honestly at this point let's just sell Rockliffe's lands and assets to Bulkhaul if FFP let's that stuff go with stadiums it's pointless and adherent clubs get shafted along the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 14.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi guys! PAOK fan here from Greece. You are getting a really hard worker in Akpom. He is a top lad and a good professional. When he first came, he was considered a bench player. It was the 2018-19 sea

Morsy nearly done

Williams fee nearly agreed. 1.75million rising to 2.5 (So 1.75 then 😂).

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Jamie-H said:

FFS another one?

Honestly at this point let's just sell Rockliffe's lands and assets to Bulkhaul if FFP let's that stuff go with stadiums it's pointless and adherent clubs get shafted along the way.

Gibson might have something to say about that, mate, such as bugger off!

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Yes, one from taking a freekick and one from a shot centrally just outside the area.  I don't think either of those had anything to with him playing RWB. Think back to the game and point out all of the positive things he brought to it as a RWB.  There aren't any, he hardly did anything at all there, because he's quite clearly not a RWB.

He may not be a natural RWB but he played well: hardworking, tenacious, linked with Dijksteel well.

In a game where we conceded 1 shot it's hard to say anyone played poorly defensively and he also played a part in both goals.

I rather he started RWB than Spence atm.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mendieta420 said:

He may not be a natural RWB but he played well: hardworking, tenacious, linked with Dijksteel well.

In a game where we conceded 1 shot it's hard to say anyone played poorly defensively and he also played a part in both goals.

I rather he started RWB than Spence atm.

Well, that's not much of a surprise is it to be fair?  

He didn't make a tackle during the game, he put a couple of crosses in that didn't reach a Boro player, and he had the worst passing accuracy out of every outfield player other than Akpom.  The only difference between what Spence has done so far and how Tavernier played on Saturday, is that Tav takes freekicks, Spence doesn't, and Spence isn't going to be taking too many shots from 20/25 yards in front of the penalty area.  Their actual performances as RWB's was no different at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Yes, one from taking a freekick and one from a shot centrally just outside the area.  I don't think either of those had anything to with him playing RWB. Think back to the game and point out all of the positive things he brought to it as a RWB.  There aren't any, he hardly did anything at all there, because he's quite clearly not a RWB.

I don't remember Tav doing pretty much anything in full-back areas. He barely even had to come back and help cover, did it maybe once or twice. The positional stats show that too, the heatmaps show he spent most his time in right-wing areas and their left wing-back spent most his time defending in that area of the pitch.

It also helps when you look at the average position of the Barnsley players, not only was their attack pretty much all central but only the two strikers actually had average positions beyond the half-way line.

image.png.4289c335f984b2eae780d25aa619c93f.png

(I've just realised as writing this that their left-back moved into centre-mid and their right-back went to left-back when Ludewig came on for them, so 2 and 4 in this picture is slightly offset by those positional changes no doubt, making the wing-backs look more central, though their journey up the pitch is probably still reasonable to judge here)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't think we can make any conclusions at all from that game vs Barnsley. They literally didn't lay a glove on us for 90mins until we handed them a goal, they're very poor and completely bereft of confidence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Yes, one from taking a freekick and one from a shot centrally just outside the area.  I don't think either of those had anything to with him playing RWB. Think back to the game and point out all of the positive things he brought to it as a RWB.  There aren't any, he hardly did anything at all there, because he's quite clearly not a RWB.

Neither do I, just wanted your attention.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

I don't remember Tav doing pretty much anything in full-back areas. He barely even had to come back and help cover, did it maybe once or twice. The positional stats show that too, the heatmaps show he spent most his time in right-wing areas and their left wing-back spent most his time defending in that area of the pitch.

It also helps when you look at the average position of the Barnsley players, not only was their attack pretty much all central but only the two strikers actually had average positions beyond the half-way line.

image.png.4289c335f984b2eae780d25aa619c93f.png

(I've just realised as writing this that their left-back moved into centre-mid and their right-back went to left-back when Ludewig came on for them, so 2 and 4 in this picture is slightly offset by those positional changes no doubt, making the wing-backs look more central, though their journey up the pitch is probably still reasonable to judge here)

He didn't do anything anywhere, that's kinda my point.  The game would have passed him by completely if he didn't take freekicks or work that shot for himself.  I don't get why people want to neuter one of our best attacking players by playing him as a RWB?  All the moaning on here about team selection is bloody daft if people then support something like this.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

He didn't do anything anywhere, that's kinda my point.  The game would have passed him by completely if he didn't take freekicks or work that shot for himself.  I don't get why people want to neuter one of our best attacking players by playing him as a RWB?  All the moaning on here about team selection is bloody daft if people then support something like this.

 

Oh, people are saying they still want him to play there? That seems strange. I thought he did alright against Barnsley but I certainly don't think there's evidence there of Tav being a good choice for right wing-back, especially when he had absolutely sod all defending to do all game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Neverbefore said:

I really don't think we can make any conclusions at all from that game vs Barnsley. They literally didn't lay a glove on us for 90mins until we handed them a goal, they're very poor and completely bereft of confidence. 

The frustrating thing is that they didn't look much different in the cup until they scored, either. We were just rubbish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Changing Times said:

He didn't do anything anywhere, that's kinda my point.  The game would have passed him by completely if he didn't take freekicks or work that shot for himself.  I don't get why people want to neuter one of our best attacking players by playing him as a RWB?  All the moaning on here about team selection is bloody daft if people then support something like this.

 

Ha ha couldn't agree more. The same people who think Dijksteel is now a CB after only 3 decent performances. 

Square pegs in round holes... Absolutely sick of it. We have done it for years

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody has actually reported me 😀

First of all, I'm sorry if anybody was offended by me posting this emoji 🖕.  I hadn't realised that an emoji like this 🖕 could really be seen as offensive, because of it's cartoon-like nature.  As a rule, I don't take the emojis that seriously, and when posting this 🖕it's not meant to be taken at face value.  I have a brusque manner on here sometimes but it's mostly just an act, and such things as posting this 🖕 are meant only in a joking way.  Secondly, giving Will the bird is actually allowed under Magna Carta, and if anything it should be encouraged.

And so, in conclusion 🖕🖕🖕

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • Really poignant for me this.  My eldest son's partner had to give birth to their first child yesterday even though she had passed away in the womb on friday.   Tragic and devastating for us all but the way in which he has handled himself in the last few days is incredible.   So whilst it hurts like hell, a very proud father.  
    • I'm surprised that Gestede has actually managed 178 games in his career so I just checked and according to Wiki he has managed 284 games over his entire career which for a 32 year old isn't many. Smith at three years younger has played 410 games so at least he may be available for selection instead of sending in a sick note. They both seem to have a 1:4 ratio which isn't great but much more useful if fit and available and that's before we consider the respective costs involved for fees and wages.
    • There was an astonishing story in the Guardian about why Magath bombed at Fulham, shortly after he left. It sounds like we dodged a bullet by not appointing him. https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/sep/20/fulham-farewell-magath-felix-madcap That said, it's extremely narrow-minded and parochial to dismiss a German manager because he'd supposedly turn the town of Middlesbrough into an enclave of ze Faterland. Wonder what changed in the run-up to Aitor's arrival?
    • Yeah, you have no idea. I had it all written out, it's crazy. I also just realised I have the very last scenario wrong. If Denmark win 1-0, Finland lose 2-1 and Denmark get only 1 disciplinary point more than Finland, Denmark will still finish 2nd. It's only if Denmark get 2 or more greater than Finland that they will finish 3rd. Basically, that scenario with those scores and only 1 yellow card more than Finland goes all the way to the last tiebreaker. Which goes all the way back to the qualifying groups and compares position, then points, goal difference etc. But even though Finland got more points than Denmark in qualifying (they finished in the same position), Finland got 6 of those points against the 6th placed team. Because some of the groups have 6 teams (Finland) and some groups have 5 (Denmark), they re-do the tables as if nobody ever played the 6th placed team. So Denmark would retain their 16 points, Finland would drop from 18 to 12 as if they never played Liechtenstein.
    • Well it could be, if they haven't been recommending the kind of players he is looking for. Or else it speaks to more poor communication if they haven't been given the right instructions. Some people adopt the, "If you want something done properly...do it yourself..." philosophy if they find others aren't doing what they want. Maybe thats whats going on here...unless Warnock has had the same approach at his other clubs. 🤷‍♂️  

×
×
  • Create New...