20/21 - new kit

[TeaCider24 12,639]

We do have the worst of all the 32Red taglines too, as ours can be taken as an unfortunate slight at the team.

[RealSlimSladeyy 769]

59 minutes ago, Lord_Moose said:

Don't like it, you've got a collar and then some weird black, V neck trim, just doesn't work together,  should have been one or the other. Not to mention the horrible sponsor.

Cheers gok

[estonpidge 1,449]

4 minutes ago, ManBearPig said:

I wish there was an option to buy a shirt sponsor free. 

would willingly pay more!

 

[White Band 831]

I love that top. Just a shame that the sponsor and tagline spoil it. Wish there was an option of paying a bit extra to get it without.  My favourite kit ever was the year we had the monthly sponsors and the shirt was sold without one.

I notice that we are being told to set our limits (? = don't expect to achieve anything?) whereas the other 32Red teams have more positive tag lines. Did the club get to choose which tag line it wanted?

[Brunners 7,982]

5 minutes ago, White Band said:

I love that top. Just a shame that the sponsor and tagline spoil it. Wish there was an option of paying a bit extra to get it without.  My favourite kit ever was the year we had the monthly sponsors and the shirt was sold without one.

I notice that we are being told to set our limits (? = don't expect to achieve anything?) whereas the other 32Red teams have more positive tag lines. Did the club get to choose which tag line it wanted?

You're obligated to like the top. If you didn't, as a moderator I'd force you into a name change.

[DurhamRed 2,047]

I really like this top and would of bought if it wasn't for the sponsor. But don't fancy paying £48 to walk around advertising a betting company thank you 🙂

[ScarBoro 857]

48 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

I've often wondered why thats never happened, in all of Gibson's time in charge.

 

Bear in mind the EFL are supposed to ensure sponsorship is at commercial rates ( to avoid owners breaking the FFP rule by simply sponsoring their own teams for huge amounts)

Sponsorship tends to be companies selling to end consumers, who need to reach millions of people. Business providing services to other businesses won’t benefit hugely, if at all, from this type of advertising. I would guess any advertising Bulkhaul does will be in trade magazines, corporate events for suppliers and existing customers etc. Given SG disputes with EFL, I would think they would be all over any Bulkhaul sponsorship to try to prove SG was breaking rules.

 

[DurhamRed 2,047]

25 minutes ago, ManBearPig said:

I wish there was an option to buy a shirt sponsor free. 

I'd pay more £70 for this 

[nunthorpered 1,922]

Absolutely horrible. Really disappointed with that shirt

[Redcar Rioja 5,975]

I would prefer the Sponsorship to be on the Red beneath rather than on the White band in future and better still keep the White band sacrosanct for the Boro badge to be embroidered centrally on it.

[LBP 3,035]

Saw this on twitter, infinitely better

[White Band 831]

I hope Bristol City don't do a white band this year.  It really irritated me the year they did that.  I know it's irrational, but it felt like they had stolen part of our identity. 

[estonpidge 1,449]

I work with lads from all over and they associate the band with us and ask why it's missing when we don't have it

[Redcar Rioja 5,975]

8 minutes ago, White Band said:

I hope Bristol City don't do a white band this year.  It really irritated me the year they did that.  I know it's irrational, but it felt like they had stolen part of our identity. 

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

[ManBearPig 1,853]

Acetone on the back of the sponsor is what you can use to remove the sponsorship logo. Pisses me off that people in the club sign off on things like this.