GrimsbyBoro 2,503 3.1k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Brunners said: Depends on how much stock you put in Warnocks quotes that he was going to try and convince Clayton to be available Suppose it also depends on the reason he missed the last game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Codger 4,443 5k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Hopefully Britt doesn't repeat his performance from the game at the Riverside....I still can't understand how he missed those two chances...especially the first.....time to redeem yourself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Changing Times 17,679 24.5k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, Brunners said: Depends on how much stock you put in Warnocks quotes that he was going to try and convince Clayton to be available I thought that Warnock had decided before the last game that Clayton wasn't going to play a part and told him he could therefore miss the game but that he'd probably be available for the final game if Warnock decided to select him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanFromDownSouth 1,821 5.9k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Really hope we can get a result today. 2-2 I reckon this one. UTB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Band 831 3.7k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 I thought Clayton was dealing with a 'family issue'. Warnock said something about that at the weekend, but there was no detail and therefore we have no idea what it actually means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanFromDownSouth 1,821 5.9k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 From the warm-ups looks like we are lining up with a back 4. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnmfc81 1,019 2.2k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Just now, DanFromDownSouth said: From the warm-ups looks like we are lining up with a back 4. I seen that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Changing Times 17,679 24.5k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Warnock said: "I saw both Adam and Ravel yesterday and said to them that they needn’t be involved, but he (Clayton) would be available on Wednesday if I wanted him. “He was doing something family-wise, and I said to him, ‘That’s okay’. But I think he’ll be available for Wednesday if I want him to be." The manager said: “We had a chat yesterday, and I decided it was OK for him to miss the game. His contract is up, and I’m sure it will be discussed with everybody else’s contracts who are up." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinemrippers 1,324 1.3k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Interesting that Warnock hasn’t started Wing yet. I think he was hyped this year and has obviously scored some decent goals but overall contribution not enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoroJake 3,151 6.5k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Just now, Skinemrippers said: Interesting that Warnock hasn’t started Wing yet. I think he was hyped this year and has obviously scored some decent goals but overall contribution not enough. Probably because of what he saw when he came on as a substitute. Can't remember what game it was, but he came on as a sub and kept passing the ball to the other team 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoroAbroad 537 2k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 I see Pears is dropped to the bench again? Guess he blew his chance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcar Rioja 10,171 9.8k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 39 minutes ago, Neverbefore said: Yet another flip in formation.. seems to be every game under warnock, even more so than it was under woodgate Howson is suspended, Pears had a bit of a mare last time out and he has gone with Britt over Roberts how does that constitute a flip? To emphasise the point Warnock has only named 6 subs, he couldn't flip even if he wanted to. By all means criticise him when and where its due but its a bit harsh when he can't even name a full bench and one of those six who is named is a teenager. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brunners 9,604 25.8k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 10 minutes ago, Changing Times said: Warnock said: "I saw both Adam and Ravel yesterday and said to them that they needn’t be involved, but he (Clayton) would be available on Wednesday if I wanted him. “He was doing something family-wise, and I said to him, ‘That’s okay’. But I think he’ll be available for Wednesday if I want him to be." The manager said: “We had a chat yesterday, and I decided it was OK for him to miss the game. His contract is up, and I’m sure it will be discussed with everybody else’s contracts who are up." He later said: Quote On Saturday, Warnock said the veteran midfielder missed the match for personal reasons but in his pre-match press conference, he admits that Clayton has yet to commit to playing against Wednesday. The 31-year-old is out of contract though reportedly signed a waiver to play in this month’s remaining Championship fixtures. Asked about Clayton’s availability, Warnock said: “I will speak to Adam. He wasn’t available but I’m going to speak to him later on today about that.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Band 831 3.7k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 I am so nervous...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Changing Times 17,679 24.5k Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Yeah, that was why I said assuming it was Warnock who made the decision because I don't think it's quite clear either way. I don't think he'd have started tonight and I suspect he didn't want to be on the bench so possibly a bit of both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts