Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Dan's Summer Transfer Thread. Aka: " Post Mortem Time""


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, xathras said:

That's no way to judge a player. Take George friend as example we bought him for peanuts from a relegated side and he went on to be the back bone of our side for years

I'm judging him on his stats and at 26 he's done very little for a forward even in a poor league in Scotland, ok so what's he been judged on then. So we've been scouting a player who's in a team that was fighting relegation and got relegated, not having it.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 19.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Offer has been accepted bauser has had his critics but he has pulled masterstrokes on both of these.  Now over to you Leo!  Payero small issues look sorted should be an announcement tomorrow or f

Gibson doing a Gibson. Having another punt, pushing for Bolasie, this Argentinian and money available for a couple more. (Not a lot though) Spence going for £5m

Not been keeping up but Sporar should be sorted by Tuesday 

Posted Images

Some claim negatively- I would class it more realism.A very thorough analysis of the guy really leaves one scratching your head wondering how we have reached such depths in our recruitment. This has to be the bottom of our descent of poor buys. 
 

If he is anything much better than useless then that will be surprising. If he scores anything like double figures equally it will be a surprise.

Poor choice has been made, if this is the future of MFC then it ain’t looking too rosey!

  • Like 2
  • Angry 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The negative reaction to Ikpeazu is reminiscent to the generally negative reaction to our serious interest in Kieffer Moore last summer. Moore’s time at Cardiff has shown that he’d have been an excellent signing for us, so hopefully us signing Ikpeazu can turn out as successfully as Moore at Cardiff. All that really matters is that he’s a really good fit for our system. As he’s 6 foot 3 and powerfully built, he’s surely going to be a marked improvement on the likes of small likes of Assombalonga that can’t hold the ball up.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TeaCider24 said:

It's hard to judge though, isn't it?

I'm not overly enamoured with this signing but he was in a very poor team, he was in a very poor team at Hearts too.

He might well have struggled because he was in a struggling side.

Though you could equally argue that the sides struggled in part because of him.

He looked decent enough when we played Wycombe though.

He was in a poor side but he still had more shots than our lot.  His lack of goals can't be said to be from a lack of chances or simply because he played for Wycombe.  His inability to keep hold of the ball shouldn't really be relevant to what team he plays for likewise his aerial stats.  We're looking at the end result of those stats and saying they aren't great because he played for a poor side.  But then you break down his individual work and it's poor, and that is down to him, not the team he plays for surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Robin Johnson said:

Some claim negatively- I would class it more realism.A very thorough analysis of the guy really leaves one scratching your head wondering how we have reached such depths in our recruitment. This has to be the bottom of our descent of poor buys. 
 

If he is anything much better than useless then that will be surprising. If he scores anything like double figures equally it will be a surprise.

Poor choice has been made, if this is the future of MFC then it ain’t looking too rosey!

yeah but you hated Bolasie but wanted Grosicki, so I don't entirely trust your judgement.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that this guy will earn in a month what Britt earned over a weekend plus it would take another 15 years at £1M (More likely only £750K rising depending on appearances, goals and promotion etc.) to equal the cost of just one Britt Assombalonga. His goals per game ratio certainly isn't as good as Britt's but we aren't shopping in Harrods any more unfortunately, at least his cost per goal will be significantly less.

He showed decent ball control in the games against us and no doubt like Lumley the games against us have had a major impact in the decision to buy him. Bernie wasn't exactly a sensation North of the border either and done OK for us, Dimi wouldn't have been anywhere near anyone's goalkeeping list let alone top of it and as mentioned George Friend was only a quarter of the reported figure for Ikpeazu. More recently we have seen how Dijksteel and Bola proved to be worth more than their original fee.

A top four Championship Player or a bottom to lower half Premiership Player will cost at least £5M plus and I doubt we have £5M to spend in total let alone sign 8 or 9 Players with. Whether Ikpeazu can offer us anything remains to be seen but he looks like he could fit the type of Player Warnock wants which is better than one who doesn't. None of us know if he will be any use to us or indeed will only be used as an 80th minute sub for most of the season, regardless of that its what we can afford.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

He was in a poor side but he still had more shots than our lot.  His lack of goals can't be said to be from a lack of chances or simply because he played for Wycombe.  His inability to keep hold of the ball shouldn't really be relevant to what team he plays for likewise his aerial stats.  We're looking at the end result of those stats and saying they aren't great because he played for a poor side.  But then you break down his individual work and it's poor, and that is down to him, not the team he plays for surely?

The stats can easily be skewed by *** passes from bad players, both in terms of his shots and losing the ball.

Not saying they are, but pure stats don't show everything.

He might have taken a load of desperate shots from distance because he was in a struggling side, he might have struggled to hold up the ball because he was receiving sub-par balls from struggling players.

It might be a bit of straw-clutching, but it's possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Brunners said:

yeah but you hated Bolasie but wanted Grosicki, so I don't entirely trust your judgement.

Grosicki probably has a better record than Bolasie in fairness.  Bolasie has had a fairly unremarkable career when you actually look at it.  In the Championship they've both played 118 games oddly enough.  Bolasie has 10 goals and 18 assists, Grosicki has 26 goals and 25 assists.  Grosicki obviously hasn't had the Premier League experience that Bolasie has, although he has played in Ligue 1, where he got 13 goals and 13 assists in 81 games, compared to Bolasie's 119 games, 10 goals and 23 assists.  Overall, Grosicki has twice as many goals in professional football with nearly twice as many assists from 70 more appearances - 86 goals to 43 goals, 100 assists to 59 assists, and Grosicki has played more top flight football around the continent as well as more international football.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Boro 86 said:

God this site is depressing these days. Give the bloody lad a chance peeps. We are a small town in Yorkshire with a local benefactor, not a premiership super club with a sheik pumping in billions.

Let’s see where we are at the start of the season 

 

Well said, usual suspects every time...absolutely disgraceful🤕

  • Like 5
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Grosicki probably has a better record than Bolasie in fairness.  Bolasie has had a fairly unremarkable career when you actually look at it.  In the Championship they've both played 118 games oddly enough.  Bolasie has 10 goals and 18 assists, Grosicki has 26 goals and 25 assists.  Grosicki obviously hasn't had the Premier League experience that Bolasie has, although he has played in Ligue 1, where he got 13 goals and 13 assists in 81 games, compared to Bolasie's 119 games, 10 goals and 23 assists.  Overall, Grosicki has twice as many goals in professional football with nearly twice as many assists from 70 more appearances - 86 goals to 43 goals, 100 assists to 59 assists, and Grosicki has played more top flight football around the continent as well as more international football.

jeez man stop disagreeing with me, ugh.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TeaCider24 said:

The stats can easily be skewed by *** passes from bad players, both in terms of his shots and losing the ball.

Not saying they are, but pure stats don't show everything.

He might have taken a load of desperate shots from distance because he was in a struggling side, he might have struggled to hold up the ball because he was receiving sub-par balls from struggling players.

It might be a bit of straw-clutching, but it's possible.

Not being funny, but what type of passes do you think he was mostly getting?  Cos I think he was getting the types of passes that our strikers were getting.  His stats are the worst in the league, you really think that's down to bad passes? Akinfenwa won more in the air than he did by way of a direct comparison - 6.6 won and 5.6 lost from 12.2, and his unsuccessful touches were obviously a lot fewer 1.1 with 0.7 dispossessed per game.  Ikpaezu played about 2000 mins, Akinfenwa played about 1200.  It's quite a sizeable difference for two players from the same club who essentially performed the same role.

If he's signing for us then I'm gonna support him either way.  But I sincerely hope he has a lot more in his locker than just a couple of decent games against us.  The stats don't suggest that he does, they suggest he's actually a poor target man, never mind a poor striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Not being funny, but what type of passes do you think he was mostly getting?  Cos I think he was getting the types of passes that our strikers were getting.  His stats are the worst in the league, you really think that's down to bad passes? Akinfenwa won more in the air than he did by way of a direct comparison - 6.6 won and 5.6 lost from 12.2, and his unsuccessful touches were obviously a lot fewer 1.1 with 0.7 dispossessed per game.  Ikpaezu played about 2000 mins, Akinfenwa played about 1200.  It's quite a sizeable difference for two players from the same club who essentially performed the same role.

If he's signing for us then I'm gonna support him either way.  But I sincerely hope he has a lot more in his locker than just a couple of decent games against us.  The stats don't suggest that he does, they suggest he's actually a poor target man, never mind a poor striker.

I've no idea, I can honestly say I've watched Wycombe twice in my life and both were against us.

The first he scored a beauty but they were deservedly beaten as a team.

The second we were torn a new arsehole and he was heavily involved in that as well.

That's clearly not a reflection of their full season given they were bottom of the table before they played us on the final day of the season.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wycombe fans say their entire team was set up around Ikpeazu and he scored 6 goals, gestede wouldve had 20 apparently 😉

Hearts fans say this 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly didn't even think that much to the goal he scored against us. My first thought watching it then and now is how the sodding hell has the lad beaten McNair in that position. Decent finish on his left foot but he should never have got into that position to begin with.

Honestly more impressed individually with what he did for their 2nd goal at the Riverside but even then, Hall could probably do better. We were diabolical from start to finish in that one.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Downsouth changed the title to Dan's Summer Transfer Thread. Aka: " Post Mortem Time""
  • Old Codger changed the title to Dan's Summer Transfer Thread. Aka: " Sporar Tomorar?""

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • A Cardiff v West Brom H Huddersfield v Blackburn H Hull v Blackpool D Middlesbrough v Sheffield Utd A Preston v Stoke H QPR v Birmingham H Barnsley v Nottingham Forest D Derby v Reading H Fulham v Swansea H Luton v Coventry D Millwall v Bristol City A Peterbrough v Bournemouth
    • While we have a regressive Manager playing regressive football which as you say is the complete opposite to us except that when I actually type it it looks real scary. A regressive Manager playing regressive football. How bad can it get and where is it going to take us?  
    • Our fixtures become interesting after Sheffield United. Away to Hull next Saturday then we have a run of Home games to Peterborough and Barnsley then Away to Cardiff, Warnock's old Club who are struggling (although not quite as bad as ourselves), Home to Birmingham, Away to Luton before we go to the Hawthorns to face the Baggies on the 6th Nov. We then have two consecutive Home games against Millwall and Preston before a trip to Huddersfield on the 27th November. On paper there are some very "winnable" games amongst that lot so would it be fair to let Warnock have that run to save himself and get things back on track or is it too risky to let the performances continue and see those potential points frittered away like we have all year? It could be argued that it would be reasonable to give him those games but the reality is that we are seeing nothing that gives us any reason whatsoever that Warnock has a grip and is going to tun it around. There has been little logic, shape or reason as to how he sets his sides up. Our defence is as poor as I have seen from a Boro side in a long time. If we were solid at the back, keeping clean sheets while boring us to death there would at least be some merit in his thinking but porous doesn't begin to describe us. Our Midfield is a disjointed mess, they cant cover and shield the defence and they can't set up attacking passages of play. They seem to run around chasing back (or more likely chasing their man to mark) after we lose possession or running up chasing long punts, then running back again, then running up again meanwhile adding little of merit or quality. It's clear that it is due to tactics rather than them all being useless (including Howson in fairness). Their passing and ball retention is painful to watch rendering them a weak and ineffective unit regardless of personnel. The fact that we are lamenting the loss of a fairly basic clogger in Morsy illustrates just how desperate we have sunk and how low our expectations now are. Attack? I can only chuckle at the thought of us actually looking like we can attack and record efforts be they on or off target. With just about zero threat or opportunities, bereft of any quality of service we look hopeless.  Ikpeazu can be a real handful and Sporar has class yet neither seem to be effective in a Warnock side.  We have played many teams already with far fewer resources than Warnock has at his disposal and have been found wanting on each and every occasion with the exception of bottom of the table Forest who immediately sacked their Manager. Derby are a basket case and a collection of journeymen players and Rooney's nous (Rooney and nous in the same sentence is something I thought I would never be typing) but they comfortably nullified Warnock. Mark Robbins and Coventry (with their own set of off field issues for years) and limited budget of a side bettered us with ease. Reading with an inexperienced Keeper (not that it mattered as his Kit won't need to have been washed by the end of all that added time), and a defence consisting of midfielders square pegged into a makeshift defence kept us at bay with such ease it was demoralising. Then there was Blackpool and copy and paste. A terrible disorganised Defence, a Midfield that seemingly has a confused purpose and an Attack that rarely if ever threatens leaves me with little reason for optimism. I'm not even sure where to begin in terms of sorting it all out as it is so far off the ideal in every single department that it is scary as to how bad we have become and how likely it is to continue unabated because there are absolutely no signs of something clicking or even just misfiring. It's the dampest of damp squibs. Its like the end of Strachan and Mogga all over, all the signs are glaringly obvious and I suspect the players must think the same despite them being "a smashing bunch of lads really". If SG made a change now it could get worse but by how much? If he doesn't it could get better but again by how much? Weighing everything up I can't see anything to suggest anything but more of the same for the last quarter of the year and by that time we could be lamenting more lost points against mediocre to poor sides and seriously deep in relegation territory. Hull and Peterborough will be looking at their fixtures against us and seeing them as winnable six pointers, this against a side that had the Play Offs as the target only a few weeks back.    
    • Warnock shouldn't abuse referees. But I don't think boro fans should be calling our manager expletives online. It makes us all look silly. I imagine if we beat Sheffield United 3-0 then nobody will be calling him a p**** then. He won't be here much longer.
    • Our performances have been so bad this season that I now think Warnock leaving is the best thing all round. Our midfield hasn't been fit for purpose for most of this season as Warnock doesn't know how to get the best out of the players at his disposal. If the going gets tough then I doubt Warnock will dig his heels in to stick around for a mid-table at best kind of season, so I'm sure there's a good chance that he'll leave if there isn't an upturn in results soon. There's two more games against Sheffield United (home) and Hull City (away) before the next international break - which would be a good time to make a managerial change - so our results before then could decide whether Warnock leaves or not. Whilst Crooks has probably been our best performing central midfielder this season, I think him him being part of any three man midfield, especially with Warnock's direct tactics, massively reduces our fluidity in possession and just leads to our midfield three not functioning to anywhere near an acceptable standard. Last season we were far more fluid in possession without a unique "Warnock style" midfielder like Crooks. Something has dramatically changed in midfield from last season as we've got so much worse. I don't think the goals he has provided has been worth the negatives. Any three from Howson, Morsy, Saville and Tavernier last season performed to a far higher and consistent standard than any three this season so far. I can see the positives that Crooks adds to the team in a midfield role such as him pushing forward from midfield to be a targetman for flick-ons from Lumley's long kicks, and a very good aerial presence in both boxes in open play and set-pieces. However, aside from them, I think he really limits us as a team as the ball doesn't flow well with him in there. With three central midfielders we should be far more patient on the ball and allow our shape to open up far more with fullbacks overlapping, wide midfielder having a more infield position and midfielders playing through the thirds with quality. Instead everything in midfield is disjointed, messy and scrappy for us - with minimal quality as a unit. We've played our best football this season in the home game against Blackburn with Howson, Morsy and Tavernier in a midfield three - with Crooks playing as a targetman in strike. Kieran Scott must be tearing his hair out after watching how smoothly Norwich's midfield in their two promotion seasons move the ball around and progress it into the forward areas. Siliki and Payero both still adapting to the Championship won't help matters either. Whatever the cause is, the problem of the midfield is abundantly clear so it needs to be resolved as soon as possible.

×
×
  • Create New...