Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Recommended Posts

Any leaked pics, info.  Just come across this little beauty Denmark's 3rd for the upcoming euro's.  Would love something like that with a band of course.

FB_IMG_1621973634670.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 460
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

We should just go back to this, but change the year to 1876  

The thing is I'm not bothered about it.  I don't believe that the person who said it really meant it, and I doubt he was looking to really offend me with it, so I wouldn't report it or him.  A bit lik

Well to be fair they are just ideas put together by fans - either using some kit design website or art software. They probably weren't intended to be original. I'm guessing whoever did them was just t

Posted Images

That's rather lovely, isn't it? Mind you, we'd doubtlessly ruin even a top this attractive with the garish logo of a gambling company, pawnbroker or knocking shop. We haven't had a respectable sponsor since Garmin.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Manky.

I am honestly a huge fan of the general style of this season's kit, just not a great fan of the material.

Last season's was really nice too.

Hopefully next season is another knockout. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking our shirt sponsors ended this season? It would be nice to see the shirt without the sponsor on like a few seasons ago. 

I'm still hoping for that green kit. I think although not Hummel this would be a nice design if they are still hoping for a nostalgic look.

LAGALAXY_COMMUNITYKIT_SOCIAL_1920X1080_GR-05.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, smogsterking the Inspirati said:

Am I right in thinking our shirt sponsors ended this season? It would be nice to see the shirt without the sponsor on like a few seasons ago. 

I'm still hoping for that green kit. I think although not Hummel this would be a nice design if they are still hoping for a nostalgic look.

LAGALAXY_COMMUNITYKIT_SOCIAL_1920X1080_GR-05.jpg

The 32red deal was due to expire at the end of last season so unless they've extended it we should see something new.

I wouldn't  mind if they stuck the airports name on the kit or something. Would be way better than having a gambling sponsor.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Smogzilla said:

The 32red deal was due to expire at the end of last season so unless they've extended it we should see something new.

I wouldn't  mind if they stuck the airports name on the kit or something. Would be way better than having a gambling sponsor.

That wouldn't be a bad idea. I hope they keep Zoes Place sponsor on the kids kits as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, smogsterking the Inspirati said:

That wouldn't be a bad idea. I hope they keep Zoes Place sponsor on the kids kits as well. 

they didn't have zoe's place on last year did they, that was just that two seasons ago? Didn't kids kits go back to sponsorless last year?

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Brunners said:

they didn't have zoe's place on last year did they, that was just that two seasons ago? Didn't kids kits go back to sponsorless last year?

You could be right i think I just assumed they would keep it on. It was good PR from the clubs point of view and good for the charity. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So long as it incorporates a band to keep and build an identity that is instantly recognisable from the Forest and Liverpool kits etc. I can live with it. To me that should be the foundational starting point of a Boro Shirt and just for the avoidance of doubt a sash isn't a band.

Sponsorship is a necessary evil in this day and age unfortunately. I would prefer a sponsor that didn't destroy lives but the nature of Football attracts organisations who ply their trade on misery in a lot of cases so it's more likely to be another gambling company who will stump up the cash. I have often wondered if Bulkhaul would gain more than they would lose in terms of marketing by sponsoring the Shirts?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the Denmark top, but I think making it a Boro top with a white band would ruin that design. I am very happy with a few of the Hummel designs I've seen released so far so I'm looking forward to ours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here we go again white band gate vol 54.  its purely down to personal opinion , i get that, but it divides our fans . 

 Me, im not a diehard supporter of having it but there again im not totally a diehard of the actual red and white being the templateto work with.  almost every team that has tried variations akin to the band has failed ,the only two exceptions that have been completely successful in varying to a design or style that has become synonamous with thier identity are Ajax and Arsenal. 

the white band was wonderful in its original conception back in 73 but subsequent horrendous versions ruined its appal to me, yeah it was nice to see a return to it ,if only for nostalgic reasons but dont clambour for it year after year. its not our identity , it was a very neat conception in its original form, but it has outrun its ways of being utilised or redesigned.

indded, ive also wondered why weve never gone along the stripe route with the home shirt  as both newcastle and sunderland are instantly recognisable and associated with striped shirts , even hartlepool if that adds any weight to the sentence.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Essuuaitch said:

indded, ive also wondered why weve never gone along the stripe route with the home shirt  as both newcastle and sunderland are instantly recognisable and associated with striped shirts , even hartlepool if that adds any weight to the sentence.

The fact that it's instantly associated with Newcastle and Sunderland is reason enough to not do it, they've both played in that style for over a hundred years.

Sunderland play in red and white and our nearest rival.

We play in red and white.

If we randomly started playing in stripes after virtually no history of doing so, it would absolutely look like mimicry of Sunderland.

The pinstripes in 15/16 were bad enough.

Should always have the band for me, barring Bristol City occasionally copying it, we're one of the few teams to use it and it's identifiable.

Edited by TeaCider24
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • Hartlepool, Harrogate, Newcastle or Leeds please. (Away)  
    • words rarely seen in same sentence.            Joey Barton is innocent..  or not guilty. Obviously Barnsley manager dived despite testimony of eyewitness 
    • It’s clear Wilder plans on a long term stay at Boro. He has a “free hit” this season, as expectations are not sky high. We have limited money available and moving players on may not be easy as supposedly we pay more that a lot of clubs (maybe to get players to the north-east?). All of the above suggests to me, he will only sign players in January who are exactly what he wants and that if he can’t find them he will be prepared to wait until the summer rather than settle for something second best. That being the case we might not see as much movement as is hoped. The departures might be limited to those who definitely can’t  fit into the style and those with longer term contracts where we might as well take the hit now as later, but in each case only where we can find the right replacement and we get the right saving (either in transfer fee or in cutting wage bill). Incomings might be one or two permanents, plus loans from Premier League where we have no long term commitment or huge cost In terms of possible departures, Hall fits into the first category and if we can’t find an experienced replacement, Wilder might be planning to use Wood to give him experience and see if he can step up. Uche fits into both categories and if we can get some of our money back, I think he will be on the road. With Hernandez and JLS, it depends on whether there are any recall clauses allowing us to end the loan in January. I would doubt it - and both can do as squad members until end of season, so I am a bit doubtful they will be on the way. Stoj ends his contract at the end of the season and he may be able to find another club to take on his wages. If he does, then maybe one of Hemmings or Brynn will be recalled as third keeper. In terms of quality I think they would be fine, although in many ways they would be better getting first team experience where they are. Although I am not a fan of either Daniels or Lumley, again I think our wage commitment to them may prevent either leaving - unless we can and want to loan an equivalent of Dean Henderson ( as he was when SU loaned him). If Wilder can get his ball playing centre half, then Dijksteel can cover RWB and I would leave Spence to get the experience at Forest. yes, it helps them, but it may be beneficial in long term either in his development and attitude or in raising his value. So for me, OUT - Hall, Uche, Stoj and Browne and Coburn on loan. IN - good centre half and a couple of forwards, maybe one on loan. Also either Taylor or another left back for the rest of the season. Any other incomings only where we get a bargain or cut out other clubs ( e.g. where a player will be out of contract in summer and we would end up in a bidding war)
    • Hartlepool or Sheff Utd in the cup. Or just for kicks and giggles Derby.
    • Looking at Sheff Utd most of the keepers he brought in were around 22. I wouldn’t be surprised with a loan move for a Liverpool or Man City keeper.

×
×
  • Create New...