DurhamRed 2,043 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Well I'm glad this result leads to a tactical change around. As this 5 at the back system does not work we will be playing better quality than Tavistock Link to post Share on other sites
nunthorpered 1,920 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, HolgateBoy said: Paterson just has an air of David Bentley about him, was decent for about 10% of his playing career Wiki claims he is 5 ft 11. Looks about 5ft 8 Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 12,401 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Got no tech skills, just imagine Lisa says Paterson and her says him. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
nunthorpered 1,920 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, TeaCider24 said: Got no tech skills, just imagine Lisa says Paterson and her says him. just reminded me, i need to rewatch all of these Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, nunthorpered said: just reminded me, i need to rewatch all of these I just watched some Marshall Eriksen clips the other day. Best character in a TV show in years for me. Say what you want about how this show ended (badly) but I'll always love me some lawyering. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Changing Times 12,218 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, pikerman said: Struggling to understand Warnock persisting with this three at the back system with wing backs advanced up the pitch, we just do not have the players to make this work. Get back to four across the back and try to bed it in,, I know it’s only a friendly but at this rateFulham will slaughter us It's not just that. We clearly must still be using the man marking and as soon as Dijksteel follows his man away from their left hand side, there is a massive gap and nobody there for us. If Dijksteel stays where he is, then one of our midfielders (who often pick up nobody) can pick up his man moving across the pitch, so there is no space left for their number 3. People need to remember this when they complain about Spence being over on the left. They are being told to do it by the manager. Link to post Share on other sites
BoroJake 2,331 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 I hope Muniz isn’t having the game live streamed to him during this meeting 😂 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Changing Times 12,218 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 13 minutes ago, Aphex_Boro said: Is flashscores accurate and they have a 41 year old in midfield? Are you sure they don't mean us? 😉 Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 12,401 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 (edited) On cue, Paterson comes off for Jones. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
wilsoncgp 9,230 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just watching the goals back and yeah, doesn't seem like the formation is the problem as much as the tactics alongside it. Getting Dijksteel to man mark a York City player and the player he's marking is the lad who scores the first and then he's nowhere to be seen for the cross for either. Link to post Share on other sites
HolgateBoy 96 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Hopefully the last we see of him in a boro shirt. Link to post Share on other sites
LBP 3,012 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Don't see a point in Paterson staying for Rotherham Least we know now need to actually bring 2 in Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 1 minute ago, Changing Times said: It's not just that. We clearly must still be using the man marking and as soon as Dijksteel follows his man away from their left hand side, there is a massive gap and nobody there for us. If Dijksteel stays where he is, then one of our midfielders (who often pick up nobody) can pick up his man moving across the pitch, so there is no space left for their number 3. People need to remember this when they complain about Spence being over on the left. They are being told to do it by the manager. I was wondering if Paterson or Crooks is meant to drop in to cover when Dijksteel wanders off like that? Seems a bit silly to intentionally leave a huge hole out there. Link to post Share on other sites
Changing Times 12,218 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, Brunners said: I was wondering if Paterson or Crooks is meant to drop in to cover when Dijksteel wanders off like that? Seems a bit silly to intentionally leave a huge hole out there. I think it has to be Paterson. I just think it's asking for trouble when you expect attacking players to think like defenders. It's just not in their nature so they will basically forget sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, Changing Times said: I think it has to be Paterson. I just think it's asking for trouble when you expect attacking players to think like defenders. It's just not in their nature so they will basically forget sometimes. Agree with you there. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now