AllBoro10 2,235 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Mate just sent me this 4 Link to post Share on other sites
SzilardNemethsCurtains 2,844 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 3 minutes ago, Changing Times said: For what money? You mean the Larsen signing? Yeah it was all related to us apparently being cheap for not spending the £12m quoted, as claimed earlier in the thread Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 12,618 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 (edited) . Link to post Share on other sites
AllBoro10 2,235 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Basically dependant on how concrete the Watmore interest is I would say Link to post Share on other sites
Not1ofTheFickleFans 85 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, AllBoro10 said: Mate just sent me this From the sounds of this the 5 striker options will be Forss, Hoppe, Watmore(?), Akpom and Larsen/Muniz. Link to post Share on other sites
AllBoro10 2,235 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Just now, Not1ofTheFickleFans said: From the sounds of this the 5 striker options will be Forss, Hoppe, Watmore(?), Akpom and Larsen/Muniz. Well yeah but then if Watmore was to go which sounds like may happen if we agree a deal with at least 2 other strikers then it could end up being, Forss, Akpom, Hoppe and then 2 new lads 1 Link to post Share on other sites
boksicdink 1,942 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, AllBoro10 said: Mate just sent me this His maths is still off? "we've seen the difficulties in getting the two, so getting another two on top would be difficult" Where is he getting that fourth one from if he thinks we would get a third if Watmore went? Or is it more poorly phrased wording? 2 Link to post Share on other sites
J.T. 640 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Maybe we should get #FreeStrandLarsen trending on Twitter to put a bit of pressure on Groningen to accept our bid and to make Larsen feel wanted… 1 Link to post Share on other sites
PsychFur 128 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Appreciate there's a gap in the two club's valuation of Larsen but longer term the player could have a very good resale value. You'd think we need to do a deal sharpish before another club nips in. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 12,618 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Wouldn't want to be forcing out Watmore, as he's been a great signing on a free, but I do think it might be worth considering if we can get some money for him and his issues are getting worse. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
FamilyBoro 140 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 (edited) The only thing that is confusing about that is why is it Muniz or Larsen as the spends aren’t remotely the same and one is a loan? I could understand spending more on the main striker could cost us the Muniz loan if we the. won’t have enough funds, but surely if Watmore or Akbom go then we can get Muniz as well as the replacement. Link to post Share on other sites
Riverside94 957 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 I see what people are saying about just paying a bit more but Larsen seems steep to me and too big a gamble. Ok if we sign him and he takes off then it’s worth it but it’s a big IF. Also there is a team to jigsaw together. If paying 1 mil more means we can’t afford to get Greaves and a CM for example then is it worth it? or might there be other options out there for half the price of Larsen?.. all ifs and buts I know but it’s not as simple as let’s just meet the asking price. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 12,618 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, boksicdink said: His maths is still off? "we've seen the difficulties in getting the two, so getting another two on top would be difficult" Where is he getting that fourth one from if he thinks we would get a third if Watmore went? Or is it more poorly phrased wording? The two being Forss and Hoppe. The other two being Larsen and another (presumably Muniz). 1 Link to post Share on other sites
J.T. 640 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, boksicdink said: His maths is still off? "we've seen the difficulties in getting the two, so getting another two on top would be difficult" Where is he getting that fourth one from if he thinks we would get a third if Watmore went? I think he’s referring to the two we’ve already got as Hoppe and Forss and then, if Watmore was to leave, we might be wanting 2 more, which he is saying might be difficult based on how difficult getting Hoppe and Forss through the door was. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
AllBoro10 2,235 Posted August 7, 2022 Share Posted August 7, 2022 Just now, FamilyBoro said: The only thing that is confusing about that is why is it Muniz or Larsen as the spends aren’t remotely the same and one is a loan? I could understand spending more on the main striker could cost us the Muniz loan if we won’t have enough funds but surely it’s if Watmore or Akbom go then we can get Muniz as well as the replacement. If you read above I think it probably isn’t the case. We will sign Muniz, Hoppe and one more and let Watmore go. Looks clear now Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now