Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Non-Boro Football


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, TLF10 said:

Barnsley v Stoke & Cardiff v Coventry on boxing day both postponed due to covid.

If we can manage to get our games played and get some decent results all these postponements could play into our hands later on where our fixtures won’t be congested and we can rest players. Considering the season we’ve had it’s quite remarkable that we are only 10 points off automatics with 69 points to play for. Not that I think we will go up in the autos but the top half is beginning to be congested and Fulham and Bournemouth have really stuttered. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  •  

    1595

  •  

    1480

  •  

    1365

  •  

    1238

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Their is a fascinating article about the Boro in today’s Athletic... Nine championship games in 29 days.  Following a team in their maddest run ever.    Neil Warnock was on the pit

Centuries ago Villages had ducking stools whereby if the person drowned they were innocent and if they lived they were guilty and sentenced to death. Nowadays not much has changed sadly. Idiots postin

Thanks for all your thoughts and prayers. I probably shouldn’t have made things public, but I was at as very low ebb. It’s been a difficult year, not made better by COVID. Lockdown bucket lists aren’t

Posted Images

12 hours ago, wilsoncgp said:

At the end of the day, the decisions are still made by humans so will succumb to human error (it's not like goal line technology which has a near perfect record) but when I had a look, referees are statistically proven to make more correct decisions generally speaking with a VAR team than when they went without which is surely exactly what it is supposed to do?

But what's the margin of improvement?

It doesn't seem to me to be that much better.

In which case, a large amount of extra money is being spent for marginal gains.

As far as I can tell, its succumbed to the same problem as the DRS system in cricket. Initially it was only supposed to be used to correct glaring mistakes, but now its used to look at pretty much anything.

Also, the main issue seems to be consistency in its use. Some officials seem refer to VAR more than others, for decisions on different incidents.

I think it might be an improvement if they flipped the whole thing round and, like in cricket, they put the power of review in the teams' hands. You're allowed 3 reviews to start with. If a decision is overturned you keep the review, if not, you lose it.

 

 

Edited by AnglianRed
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, AnglianRed said:

But what's the margin of improvement?

It doesn't seem to me to be that much better.

In which case, a large amount of extra money is being spent for marginal gains.

As far as I can tell, its succumbed to the same problem as the DRS system in cricket. Initially it was only supposed to be used to correct glaring mistakes, but now its used to look at pretty much anything.

Also, the main issue seems to be consistency in its use. Some officials seem refer to VAR more than others, for decisions on different incidents.

I think it might be an improvement if they flipped the whole thing round and, like in cricket, they put the power of review in the teams' hands. You're allowed 3 reviews to start with. If a decision is overturned you keep the review, if not, you lose it.

I'm not sure about that last bit in cricket but I know how they use it in Tennis and yeah maybe it could work.

But VAR isn't being overused, it's still used for the same 4 incidents it always has been since it came in, at least over here. From there, it has highlighted problems with clarity within the rules that referees have not, in the past, had to be challenged on.

VAR is always active too, it's not just called upon by the match ref as far as I'm aware, they're always checking, they just don't always bring something to the referee's attention. There might be a question from the ref but it's primarily the ref on the pitch who makes a call then gets called up on it if they think he's wrong. That could maybe be clearer if we had refs mic'd up but that may not ever happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, RiseAgainst said:

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

If the players go on strike and refuse to play won’t that make the looming fixture list even more congested?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RiseAgainst said:

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

I really have no idea why they feel so hard done by. People go to work every day during this pandemic. If they want less fixtures they should tell their clubs to advocate for a smaller champions league and lesser European nights. But that would cut into their massive wages and probably not something they’d entertain. I think the rules are fairly generous. If you have enough players you play and if you don’t the game is postponed. By all means close the stands for 6 weeks but I see no reasons why they can’t play when they are not sick. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RiseAgainst said:

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

Nah mate you're not being unfair at all, in fact you've pretty much hit the nail on the head.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

When there's loads of games called off in Sunday league we have to play 4 games a week and I have to pay for the pleasure...

You can see it from the other side though, you'll be much more likely to sustain a season or career ending injury, they're not doing it because they're lazy. They shouldn't have put the January break into place though as it's clearly causing fixture congestion.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, RiseAgainst said:

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

No, not being unfair at all!

It boils my *** that PL teams have huge squads and can field a team with 11 changes for a cup match, but when they lose a couple of key players through illness they suddenly cannot fulfil a fixture.  

As for congestion, they need to remember that playing Saturday, Tuesday, Saturday is standard procedure in the championship. If I was on the money that they are, I would drag my balls over broken glass to ensure I got the ground for kick off.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

My son plays at a good level and is only 13.  He trains 3 times per week, did play sat and Sunday and the club felt that 2 days playing was too much for them.  To be honest my son was knackered by Sunday and he is mega fit.

saying that though these clubs have big rosters of players etc.  but at the end of the day it’s about money.  You can’t field a week team as the stakes are so high.  They need to play through this ‘pandemic’.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, RiseAgainst said:

Sky Sports News are reporting that the Premier League players are "at breaking point" (Jordan Henderson) and should "go on strike" (Pep Guardiola) due to looming fixture congestion.

Is it just me, or is that an absolutely disgusting attitude considering the extraordinary liberties given to footballers during the pandemic in terms of being allowed to play while normal people were locked out of local parks and unable to sit on benches, not losing income, not having to be vaccinated, etc?

This story reminds me of Instagram influencers bleating when someone posts something unkind in response to yet another airbrushed vanity post. They come across as spoiled cosseted children who have absolutely no conception how hard life is in the real world for everyone who's not in their hermetically sealed bubble.

Or am I being unfair?

 

Apologies if this has been linked already. But it sums up my feelings

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...