Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Neverbefore

Non-Boro Football

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, BoroJake said:

Gibson about to have a party 😂

I imagine there are some legal peeps quite happy as well as this one could go the distance 🤑

They must have reached the conclusion that the valuation of the stadium has been inflated I'm guessing 🤥

Shame Derby are crap this season mind 🤭

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BoroJake said:

I doubt Gibson would be hammering the EFL about FFP if we had breached it

I think this is why he is *** because we are doing all we can to stay in limits and noone else gives a ***.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right why has it taken them so long this breach has cost Boro a place in last season's playoffs and you never know Boro could of won promotion. Gibson needs to file for compensation!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DurhamRed said:

Right why has it taken them so long this breach has cost Boro a place in last season's playoffs and you never know Boro could of won promotion. Gibson needs to file for compensation!

Table may well change quite a bit this season..  Wednesday Brum Derby all dancing penalties and that's only a small number apparently . If Villa come down there in trouble and If Fulham dont go up there struggling as well

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DurhamRed said:

Right why has it taken them so long this breach has cost Boro a place in last season's playoffs and you never know Boro could of won promotion. Gibson needs to file for compensation!

That's why I think it has to be based on the valuation otherwise it should have been dealt with sooner.   Unless the EFL have been going over the regs with a fine tooth comb and trying to see if there's a way of showing that a stadium sale like this is actually against the rules.  Derby made a £21m loss in the previous two seasons and a £14m profit in the final season (after selling the stadium for £80m).  So if the stadium sale is discounted completely then they are screwed in terms of FFP but even if the valuation is just not accepted by about £20m then they'll be screwed as well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Derby’s £10 million Defender was ruled out for the rest of the season earlier today. What a day they are having

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BoroJake said:

Derby’s £10 million Defender was ruled out for the rest of the season earlier today. What a day they are having

Derby have £10m defenders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BoroJake said:

Derby’s £10 million Defender was ruled out for the rest of the season earlier today. What a day they are having

9 monther that one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything's gonna be okey dokey Keogh 🤦‍♂️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the have employed a player on a 100k a weekend shows a massive disregard to FFP. I know the increased their sponsorship deal accordingly with red32 but it still shows a player on 5 million a year while you could argue that the increase in sponsorship deals should be used to reduce the deficit and not increase wages. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Derby have £10m defenders?

They paid £10m for Krystian Bielik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Brunners said:

They paid £10m for Krystian Bielik

Did they? Transfermarkt says 8.2 mil euros. But they are not always correct. Still it’s absurd for a club in their position. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Borodane said:

Did they? Transfermarkt says 8.2 mil euros. But they are not always correct. Still it’s absurd for a club in their position. 

The telegraph says £9.5 million

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob Dorsett from Sky reckons that the sale and lease back isn't an issue, it's that the EFL value the stadium lower than Derby's valuation.  If that's the case then this could run a while.  I assume that the EFL had it valued themselves and presumably asked if £80m was even close to realistic.  Once they've been told no it isn't they've decided to hold them in breach of the FFP rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news that Derby has finally been charged - It will definately make the rest of the league is yours stand up take notice especially as Mel Morris has close connections with the FA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...