Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Neverbefore

Non-Boro Football

Recommended Posts

Think our deal with 32 red runs out at the end of this season so hopefully we move away from a gambling sponsor regardless of legislation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Smogzilla said:

Think our deal with 32 red runs out at the end of this season so hopefully we move away from a gambling sponsor regardless of legislation.

If they're not banned, I doubt it. There's a reason we all have them, they offer the most money and we need money now more than ever.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news overall, bad news for us. Well never find a sponsor to match what we would get from a gambling company at this level.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be the same for every club though, so football finances should adjust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always refused to wear a Boro shirt with a gambling sponsor's logo on it, because I hate what gambling does to people (including a good friend of mine) and I refuse to advertise it on my clothing. It might be to the detriment of MFC's finances if either gambling sponsorship is banned or 32Red GTF next season, but it'll be to the benefit of society as a whole and fans in particular not to be walking adverts for casinos and bookies.

Are there any Teesside-based businesses big enough to be potential shirt sponsors? (other than Bulkhaul, obvs).

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RiseAgainst said:

I've always refused to wear a Boro shirt with a gambling sponsor's logo on it, because I hate what gambling does to people (including a good friend of mine) and I refuse to advertise it on my clothing. It might be to the detriment of MFC's finances if either gambling sponsorship is banned or 32Red GTF next season, but it'll be to the benefit of society as a whole and fans in particular not to be walking adverts for casinos and bookies.

Are there any Teesside-based businesses big enough to be potential shirt sponsors? (other than Bulkhaul, obvs).

 

Ramsdens 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TeaCider24 said:

It'll be the same for every club though, so football finances should adjust.

Not every club. Most clubs in the championship yes but premier League clubs can attract huge sponsorship deals from non gambling companies due to their exposure.

The gap just gets bigger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RiseAgainst said:

I've always refused to wear a Boro shirt with a gambling sponsor's logo on it, because I hate what gambling does to people (including a good friend of mine) and I refuse to advertise it on my clothing. It might be to the detriment of MFC's finances if either gambling sponsorship is banned or 32Red GTF next season, but it'll be to the benefit of society as a whole and fans in particular not to be walking adverts for casinos and bookies.

Are there any Teesside-based businesses big enough to be potential shirt sponsors? (other than Bulkhaul, obvs).

 

Stainton Steel, but I'd imagine if they were interested they'd have sponsored us a while ago.

 

Wasn't there a rumour Jaguar were going to sponsor us previously? Gibson has some links with them I seem to remember.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MMC said:

Ramsdens 😂

God, not them again. That'd mean our shirt sponsors went from gambling to pawnbrokers to gambling to pawnbrokers. All we'd be missing is a local abbatoir or a knocking shop.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, although you just know clubs will get round it by having gambling companies sponsor the stadium or the team instead.

Why can't Bulkhaul sponsor us? If Derby can play fast and loose with sponsorship rules why shouldn't we?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

Good news, although you just know clubs will get round it by having gambling companies sponsor the stadium or the team instead.

Why can't Bulkhaul sponsor us? If Derby can play fast and loose with sponsorship rules why shouldn't we?

Perhaps because they're not a consumer facing business, and commercial contracts are (a) limited in number and (b) not chosen based on advertising. People watching Boro play are unlikely to think "ooh, I really fancy sending some freight to China", whereas if we were sponsored by Three Brothers Brewing Co, people would subconsciously start to fancy a pint. I want a pint now, actually. Mmm...beer...

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

 

Why can't Bulkhaul sponsor us? If Derby can play fast and loose with sponsorship rules why shouldn't we?

Doesn’t really add up though does it? Gibson puts in what ever money he wants to (up to FFP limits of course). Let’s say it’s £5m a year. If you find an external sponsor that adds another amount into clubs income, say £1m a year. So we get £6m in total. . If .Bulkhaul sponsors the club, it’s Gibsons money, so part of the £5m total that he’s willing to put in. 
Add to that the fact that he only owns 75[?]% of Bulkhaul, so would need to get partner to agree, plus league would likely crawl over Bulkhaul sponsorship as it is not a company selling to consumers, so the advertising would not really help its business.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a vision of Derby running out in Granny Whiplash shirts. In an ideal world, there would be enough cash floating around for people to have options.. but in times like this I would rather see no sponsor than a dodgy one..  wonder if we will ever get to the stage where we will see a sponsor of the month , though that is probably a shirt collectors nightmare  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Neverbefore said:

Not every club. Most clubs in the championship yes but premier League clubs can attract huge sponsorship deals from non gambling companies due to their exposure.

The gap just gets bigger. 

Aye, unfortunately true. I still fundamentally agree with taking gambling companies off shirts but you have to wonder what comes next if we don't get promoted.

I notice somebody had said in the comments of the tweet that may or may not come to anything. Clubs putting betting sponsors on their adult shirts kind of opens the door a bit more for charities to be placed on the child shirts, something we did last season at least. I'd say that they could probably still afford to do that but if the biggest offers after 32Red for us is a company that demands to be placed as the main sponsor on a kids shirt too, will we turn that down? I can't imagine we would.

Though we haven't got any sponsor on the kid's shirt this season so who knows if that even remotely makes a different for us. For some, it might though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love a sponsor-less shirt mind i liked the one a few seasons ago that didn't have a sponsor on it. I think if it did come into fruition no betting sites on shirts. My prediction is they will try the monthly sponsors again and Manjaros will at some point be one of the sponsors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • (H) Barnsley v Birmingham (H) Brentford v Rotherham (A) Bristol City v QPR (H) Coventry v Derby (D) Millwall v Blackburn (H) Norwich v Luton (H) Preston v Bournemouth (D) Reading v Sheffield Wed (H) Stoke v Wycombe (A) Swansea v Middlesbrough
    • This to me feels very much like the Mowbray era of the type of job he asked to do, get rid of the big wages in players like  Britt for example bring in players who can do the same or better job for less and get competent coaching staff in who know what they are doing. I think personally Gibson trying to replicate the way he got promotion last time by getting someone in to balance the books and then have one big push towards promotion with the next manager.    If i am right, will that work? time will tell. 
    • Yeah,it still goes on,massive money changing hands there, Best of luck trying to drive past one on a narrow road,its like they own the rd & you have no business on it whatsoever, I tried it once and i threw it over a ditch!! Harder than it looks to follow to contours & falls on the rd.
    • As far as planning goes the Golden Thread was going to be how Boro would do things going forwards but the thought, logic and implementation of it was farcical. Gibson may (or may not) have wanted Pulis to stay on but it was impossible for Pulis to stay, there was already a Pulis out banner, social media meltdowns, inflatable dinosaurs and our season card sales were going down faster than Sunderland. That MFC are not very good at planning and that their Woodgate strategy (like Southgate) was flawed and amateurish beyond belief I think is a given. With a distinct lack of personnel changes in senior roles since at the club since (indeed one less) I doubt a new plan would have much more success. It is possibly better to have a wily astute manager who can source his own players via his own contacts etc. and set up a team to do what he believes will garner a promotion bid rather than try again to implement a new dawning under those given constraints and maybe to his credit SG has accepted that. The "personal circumstances" I think was pretty clear, people talk about Steve Gibson's lack of it yet you eloquently proved why he has far more of it than anyone on here. If it was that easy we would all be doing it and so would every Club in the country, I struggle why you failed to grasp that but then I have to admit that I struggle generally with a lot of your thought processes. I guess we are just wired differently. The "future" with any Championship Manager is around twelve months at best (I think the average is actually less) because the demand for instant success doesn't permit for longer. Fans inevitably get restless and want a new one and they want it now, or worse they didn't want him in the first place (Woodgate, Pulis, Monk etc. etc. just with ourselves). A plan with a particular style of football and type of playing personnel etc. is a great ideal and I'm not against it but that brings us back as to who implements the plan and for that and Boro see Woodgate and the Golden Thread. Steve Gibson has made many mistakes, some absolute howlers and his seemingly narcissistic style of control hasn't ingratiated himself very well with those under 45 years old (let alone those of us older) but if you think he is bad then I guess you didn't live through the Charlie Amer era. As Mogga would likely say "it is what it is". As fans we have two choices, get behind the team and make the best of it or walk away and watch Champions League on the telly instead of Championship at the Riverside on a cold wet Tuesday which is a typical Boro trait when times get tough. That's not a dig at anyone, I refused to renew my season card after Pulis and the Club hoped that myself and others would renew just on the basis that Pulis had gone, it worked for some but others held their nerve waiting to see who was the successor. When it was Woodgate I walked away for a multitude of reasons and that as much as anything was another reason why the announcement of his appointment was delayed for fear of losing even more Season card renewals. I have no doubt that some may decide to walk away now and if successful many will come back in time.
    • The Irish Tourist Board have a lot to answer for! Ive never seen a leprechaun, never wore an arran sweater, never said' Top of the morning' & i dont have a pig in the parlour,Then again if the Americans swollow up that rubbish,all the better.To be fair when i was about 8,i got my mam to cut up a bedsheet and sew it on to a Cork Gaa jersey.Hey Presto- The  White Boro Band- The only Boro shirt in Ireland!!  
×
×
  • Create New...