Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Non-Boro Football


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Neverbefore

    1324

  • Borodane

    1242

  • Brunners

    1140

  • wilsoncgp

    952

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Their is a fascinating article about the Boro in today’s Athletic... Nine championship games in 29 days.  Following a team in their maddest run ever.    Neil Warnock was on the pit

Centuries ago Villages had ducking stools whereby if the person drowned they were innocent and if they lived they were guilty and sentenced to death. Nowadays not much has changed sadly. Idiots postin

Thanks for all your thoughts and prayers. I probably shouldn’t have made things public, but I was at as very low ebb. It’s been a difficult year, not made better by COVID. Lockdown bucket lists aren’t

Posted Images

11 minutes ago, Old Codger said:

I suppose it is, though I still think anything that gives the minnows a chance of a bit of the cash has to be good, especially in the current situation...  the lads from Skibbereen did well too  

They sure did. We don‚Äôt get too many gold medals at the Olympic Games so nice when we do ūüĎć

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Blanco said:

They sure did. We don‚Äôt get too many gold medals at the Olympic Games so nice when we do ūüĎć

Especially when they are from Cork!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Leesider said:

Especially when they are from Cork!!

Claiming the medals for the People‚Äôs Republic ūüôĄ

ūü§£ūü§£ūü§£

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

League football starts again tomorrowūüĎź

Scottish Premiership kicks off at 1:30pm with Rangers v Livingston.

The League Cup fixtures start with Bournemouth v Milton Keynes at 3pm too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently at Ashton Gate. Watching Brizzel v Villa. First impressions is all the players look massive compared to ours ūüė≥

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know they’re playing better opposition but Bristol look as disjointed and scrappy as us. 
 

so there‚Äôs that I suppose ūüėä

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • While we have a regressive Manager playing regressive football which as you say is the complete opposite to us except that when I actually type it it looks real scary. A regressive Manager playing regressive football. How bad can it get and where is it going to take us? ¬†
    • Our fixtures become¬†interesting after Sheffield United. Away to Hull next Saturday then we have a run of Home games to Peterborough and Barnsley then Away to Cardiff,¬†Warnock's old Club who are struggling (although not quite as bad as ourselves), Home to Birmingham, Away to Luton before we go to the Hawthorns to face the Baggies on the 6th Nov. We then have two consecutive Home games against Millwall and Preston before a trip to Huddersfield on the 27th November. On paper there are some very "winnable" games amongst that lot so would it be fair to let Warnock have that run to save himself and get things back on track or is it too risky to let the performances continue and see¬†those potential points frittered away like we have all year? It could be argued that it would be¬†reasonable¬†to give him those games but the reality is that we are seeing nothing that gives us any reason whatsoever that Warnock has a grip and is going to tun it around. There has been little logic,¬†shape or reason as to how he sets his sides up. Our defence is as poor as I have seen from¬†a Boro side in¬†a long time. If we were solid at the back, keeping¬†clean sheets while boring us to death there would at least be some merit in his thinking but porous doesn't begin to describe us. Our Midfield¬†is a disjointed mess, they cant cover and shield the defence and they can't set up attacking passages of play. They seem to run around chasing back (or more likely chasing their man to mark) after we lose possession or running up chasing long punts, then running back again, then running up again meanwhile¬†adding little of merit or quality. It's clear that it is due to tactics rather than them all being useless (including Howson in fairness). Their passing and ball retention is painful to watch rendering them a weak and ineffective unit regardless of personnel. The fact that we are lamenting the loss of a fairly basic clogger in Morsy illustrates just how desperate we have sunk and how low our expectations now are. Attack? I can only chuckle at the thought of us actually looking like we can attack and record efforts be they on or off target. With just about zero threat or opportunities, bereft of any quality of service we look¬†hopeless. ¬†Ikpeazu can be a real¬†handful and Sporar has class yet neither seem to be effective in a Warnock side.¬† We have played many¬†teams already with far fewer resources than Warnock has at his disposal and have been found wanting on each and every occasion with the exception of bottom of the table Forest who immediately sacked their Manager. Derby are a basket case and a collection of journeymen players and Rooney's¬†nous (Rooney and nous in the same sentence is something I thought I would never be typing) but they comfortably nullified Warnock. Mark Robbins and¬†Coventry (with their own set of off field issues for years) and limited budget of a side bettered us with ease.¬†Reading with an inexperienced Keeper (not that it mattered as his Kit won't need to have been washed by the end of all that added time), and a defence consisting of midfielders square pegged into a makeshift defence kept us at bay with such ease it was demoralising. Then there was Blackpool and copy and paste. A terrible disorganised Defence, a Midfield that seemingly has a confused purpose and an Attack that rarely if ever threatens leaves me with little reason for optimism. I'm not even sure where to begin in terms of sorting it all out as it is so far off the ideal in every single department that it is scary as to how bad we have become and how likely it is to continue unabated because there are absolutely no signs of something clicking or even just misfiring. It's the dampest of damp squibs. Its like the end of Strachan and Mogga all over, all the signs are glaringly obvious and I suspect the players must¬†think the same despite them being "a¬†smashing bunch of lads really". If SG made a change now it could get worse but by how much? If he doesn't it could get better but again by how much? Weighing everything up I can't see anything to suggest anything but more of the same for the last quarter of the year and by that time we could be lamenting more lost points against mediocre to poor sides and seriously deep in relegation territory. Hull and Peterborough will be looking at their fixtures against us and seeing them as winnable six pointers, this against a side that had the Play Offs as the target only a few weeks back. ¬† ¬†
    • Warnock shouldn't abuse referees. But I don't think boro fans should be calling our manager expletives online. It makes us all look silly. I imagine if we beat Sheffield United 3-0 then nobody will be calling him a p**** then. He won't be here much longer.
    • Our performances have been so bad this season¬†that I now think¬†Warnock leaving is the best thing all round. Our midfield hasn't been fit for purpose for most of this season as Warnock doesn't know how to get the best out of the players at his disposal. If the going gets tough then I doubt Warnock will¬†dig his heels in to stick around for a mid-table¬†at best kind of season, so I'm sure there's a good chance that he'll leave if there isn't an upturn in results soon. There's two more games against Sheffield United (home) and Hull City (away) before the next international break - which would be a good time to make a managerial change - so our results before then could decide whether Warnock leaves or not. Whilst Crooks has¬†probably been our best performing central midfielder this season, I think him him being part of any three man midfield, especially¬†with Warnock's¬†direct tactics,¬†massively reduces our fluidity in possession and just leads to our midfield three not functioning to anywhere near an acceptable standard. Last season we were far more fluid in possession without a unique "Warnock style" midfielder like Crooks. Something has dramatically changed in midfield from last season as we've got¬†so much worse. I don't think the goals he has provided has been worth the negatives.¬†Any three from Howson, Morsy, Saville and Tavernier last season performed to a far higher and consistent standard than any three this season so far. I can¬†see the positives that Crooks¬†adds to the team in a midfield role such as him pushing forward from midfield to be¬†a targetman for flick-ons from Lumley's long kicks, and a very good aerial presence in¬†both boxes in open play and set-pieces. However, aside from them, I think he really limits us as a team as the ball doesn't flow well with him in there. With three central midfielders we should be far more patient on the ball and allow our shape to open up far more with fullbacks overlapping, wide midfielder having¬†a more¬†infield position and midfielders playing through the thirds with quality. Instead everything in midfield is disjointed, messy and scrappy for us - with minimal quality as a unit. We've played our best football¬†this season in the home¬†game against Blackburn¬†with¬†Howson, Morsy and Tavernier in a midfield three - with Crooks playing as a targetman in strike. Kieran Scott must be tearing his hair out after watching how smoothly Norwich's midfield in their two promotion seasons move the ball around and progress it into the forward areas. Siliki and Payero both still adapting to the Championship won't help matters either. Whatever the cause is, the problem of the midfield is abundantly clear so it needs to be resolved as soon as possible.
    • No, I'm saying that there's a great deal of hypocrisy to try and stand up for the right of a person not to receive abuse when the person you're talking about is Neil Warnock. The man hands out dog's abuse every game. It's not whether he can take it or whether he deserves it, it's that if he can't then be shouldn't be throwing stones himself.

×
×
  • Create New...