Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Non-Boro Football


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Borodane said:

It still doesn't change the fact that Arsenal got lucky, because if the ref had seen De Gea was down he would have blown the whistle immediatley.

Did the ref say he should have blown earlier or is this just an opinion? Because it sounds like, at least in the English interpretation, that play should carry on until that period of play is over like all other things like this in the Prem.

If it was in the Championship or any other division without VAR, yeah probably because the ref has to make decisions with his team relatively quickly with no external support. But especially around the topic of goals in the Prem, VAR checks them after the fact to see if they should have been ruled out to allow the game to play on and had it been an Arsenal player standing on De Gea's foot then surely, the goal would have been ruled out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 30.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Neverbefore

    1397

  • Borodane

    1350

  • Brunners

    1271

  • wilsoncgp

    1095

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Their is a fascinating article about the Boro in today’s Athletic... Nine championship games in 29 days.  Following a team in their maddest run ever.    Neil Warnock was on the pit

Centuries ago Villages had ducking stools whereby if the person drowned they were innocent and if they lived they were guilty and sentenced to death. Nowadays not much has changed sadly. Idiots postin

Thanks for all your thoughts and prayers. I probably shouldn’t have made things public, but I was at as very low ebb. It’s been a difficult year, not made better by COVID. Lockdown bucket lists aren’t

Posted Images

1 hour ago, wilsoncgp said:

Did the ref say he should have blown earlier or is this just an opinion? Because it sounds like, at least in the English interpretation, that play should carry on until that period of play is over like all other things like this in the Prem.

If it was in the Championship or any other division without VAR, yeah probably because the ref has to make decisions with his team relatively quickly with no external support. But especially around the topic of goals in the Prem, VAR checks them after the fact to see if they should have been ruled out to allow the game to play on and had it been an Arsenal player standing on De Gea's foot then surely, the goal would have been ruled out.

He put the whistle in his mouth as soon as he realized De Gea was down so yeah I think he would. Refs always do when the keeper is hurt. Can you ever remember a game that has continued when the keeper is down injured? Refs instantly stops play. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Borodane said:

He put the whistle in his mouth as soon as he realized De Gea was down so yeah I think he would. Refs always do when the keeper is hurt. Can you ever remember a game that has continued when the keeper is down injured? Refs instantly stops play. 

He looks in De Gea's direction before Elneny even heads the ball down and doesn't indicate anything. He hesitates the first time he moves towards putting it in his mouth and this is presumptuous on my part but I reckon it's because he wants the ball out of play before making a decision. He knows there's going to be a decision to be made but I don't think he's all too clear which way it will go based on the scuffle. Ball hits the net, whistle to mouth, lets have a look and let VAR help make the call.

I don't have stats or significant memories to back this up or anything but I'd say most situations where a keeper is down injured occur when they're fouled from a set-piece situation or when the play is nowhere near them and nothing is on. They won't prevent the attacking team from going forward if its their keeper down injured, I doubt, the danger is they're a significant man down in defensive situations so that wouldn't be a necessary call for attention unless the attacking team wanted it to happen. There's probably situations where a keeper may get injured from making a save and can't recover quickly to make a second. Would play stop then? If the next effort comes in too quickly, probably not.

And with the situation with attacking teams being allowed the benefit of the doubt in genuine goal-scoring situations, I don't think it'd be right to take that opportunity away from the attacking team if they aren't the ones that do the damage and in those situations, we can see it's really difficult to make out who did what in a penalty area. Same goes for marginal offsides, benefit goes to the attacking team and the decision of goal is determined after the VAR check. In most situations, the keeper will have been fouled by an attacking player so goal is ruled out, here that wasn't the case so the goal, in my opinion, rightly stands. I don't see why this should be any different to offsides, personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Old Codger said:

Daft question time. ..   does anybody know if any other football club has had three managers or more in a row whose surnames began with the same letter  

Smogsterking is right,  I just googled Celtic managers and before Jock Stein they had the trio of Willie Maley, Jimmy McStay and Jimmy McGrory

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BearSmog said:
1 hour ago, Old Codger said:

Daft question time. ..   does anybody know if any other football club has had three managers or more in a row whose surnames began with the same letter  

Smogsterking is right,  I just googled Celtic managers and before Jock Stein they had the trio of Willie Maley, Jimmy McStay and Jimmy McGrory

It's also happened twice in Rangers history (McCoist, McDowell and McCall/White, Waddell and Wallace)

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Old Codger said:

Daft question time. ..   does anybody know if any other football club has had three managers or more in a row whose surnames began with the same letter  

Both of our two previous managers have the same initials: Chris Wilder and Colin W******

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the construction of Scottish (and Irish) names, Mc and O feels a little like Bulgarian names ending in V or Croatian with C, but good shout with White, Waddell and Wallace. Weird that they are W's too 🙂 , but that is more what I was wondering.      Many thanks, so at least one other    up to now. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • I honestly believe a full season under Wilder in the LCM role would show everyone just how good he is. I think if you took him out of our midfield you'd see how bad and unbalanced it is. McGree and Crooks won't work because neither of them cover enough ground or do the defensive side of the game.  Howson I love but let's be honest he's not a traditional out and out CDM. He losses the ball too often in bad positions and his positioning for CDM can be quite poor. He brings commitment, energy and workrate though.  For me in midfield we need a LWB, CDM and an RCM. I would drop Crooks to the bench or move him on. I know that he's scored ten goals this season but I believe we can sign players that more suit Wilders system with energy, pressing and intensity. I would keep him for the bench but personally would look to replace him in the starting team. Tavernier was in the Top 10 for both Key Passes and Tackles Won. He was ranked 3rd for passes in the final third. He's expected goals and assists combined for this season was 15. I could see him getting 15-20 goal contributions in a full season under Wilder. He had 10 this season and has shown real signs of improvement. He does a lot more than what people realise for the team.  Tavernier was given corners because he was the only real left-footed option in the team. I do agree though that most of his deliveries were relatively poor considering he's our designated corner kick tacker they didn't look practiced.
    • Wouldn't call it interesting personally (i.e. not sure what there is to draw from it), think it just reinforces the club are happy they moved on from him. I can't remember the last time they did a season long goals montage so I could be wrong but it feels like this alone is a little out of the ordinary and perhaps only put together because Wilder is at the helm. I think the club is just continuing to want to push Wilder and positivity around him, that's how they approached the Season Card campaign too. It's not necessarily wanting to reflect on the season just gone as a whole but more to give an idea of what's to come.
    • I don't think corner taking ability is really something that pushes someone over that £10m threshold. He can be both one of our better corner takers, and still not be a particularly good corner taker, but that really feels like grasping at straws for something to still criticise him with. 
    • For what it’s worth with Tav, I genuinely think he would flourish as a left wing back, and simplified his game.  Tav travels well with the ball, is energetic and I can’t fault his work ethic at all. He always puts a shift in. But I just think he could use it so much better than he is currently doing from watching him this season. I still think he has some work to do in the final third, which ironically was where we struggled most to break teams down. I just don’t think he’s there yet and I don’t think he does a job which an additional player in midfielder couldn’t do (he’s replaceable).   For a player who takes corners, you’d expect better delivery on a more consistent basis for him to be worth 10m + which some are quoting on various platforms.    I realise that Tav is very polarised on the opinion poll. Like I say, I don’t hate him and think he’s ‘bad’, he’s just not consistent enough yet to be deemed as integral to how we play in midfield in my view  
    • Maybe if he was Slovenian and not from our academy he'd be the best thing since sliced bread 🤷 

×
×
  • Create New...