smogsterking the Inspirati 2,254 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 Awful game so far but there's no way that was a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites
TeaCider24 11,126 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 Slow motion replays need to be scrapped. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Borodane 5,783 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 Incredibly NI have been closest to scoring when they hit the post following a defensive mistake from a long punt. But they are awful. Looks like most of them have never seen a football 🤣 112 passes in the first half with just 54% successful passes and just 22% possession. Fully expect Denmark to just beat them in the second half. Link to post Share on other sites
Borodane 5,783 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 And NI score. The most primitive football team ever🤣 Good goal though bad goalkeeping. Link to post Share on other sites
Borodane 5,783 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 Well this aged well🤣 two good counter attacking goals from NI. Executed their plan to perfection. Link to post Share on other sites
SmogDane 3,958 Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 Schmeichel Junior is over the hill .. Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 4,015 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/ffp-everton-man-city-chelsea-31483038 FFP punishments decided as Man City and Chelsea wait following Everton points deduction, THE BIG DEBATE: Is Financial Pair Play working? After Everton were deducted 10 points for breaching Premier League financial rules, we asked our team what they would do with the current regulations https://www.premierleague.com/news/3788486 offical details on evertons guilty verdict Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 4,015 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 (edited) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67490620 Premier League: Newcastle can sign players on loan from PIF-owned Saudi clubs after vote (or rather clubs can loan players from other clubs with the same owners/share holders) Tougher rules relating to sponsorship deals between 'associated parties' also failed to get the necessary support, with seven clubs voting against the amendment. They were understood to be the same clubs that opposed the ban on loans, with the exception of Burnley. And in a further sign of a split between its clubs, league chiefs were also unable to get them to approve a £900m so-called 'New Deal' financial settlement with the English Football League, despite hopes a package could be announced. Insiders insisted there was "positive momentum" behind talks, but no vote took place after a continuing impasse over new cost control measures. The Premier League has been under mounting pressure to agree improved level of support for the football pyramid. A report by the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Select Committee in June said if no funding plan is reached soon, the government should accelerate setting up an independent football regulator "to impose a deal". Panel that docked Everton points will decide compensation claims The same independent panel that docked Everton 10 points for breaching Premier League financial rules will decide on any financial compensation claims from rival clubs. Leeds and Leicester - who were relegated to the Championship last season - along with Burnley - who were relegated in 2022 before returning - are weighing up whether to press ahead with a claim against the Toffees. Had the 10-point deduction been applied in 2021-22, Burnley would have stayed up, as would Leicester last season if it had counted then. Leeds would have finished a place higher, but would still have gone down. It has been reported Everton could potentially face claims for tens of millions of pounds. The clubs have 28 days from the date of the ruling to decide. If they do, barrister David Phillips KC, High Court judge His Honour Alan Greenwood, and chartered accountant Nick Igoe (former West Ham finance director), would hear their arguments. In last week's ruling, Phillips KC referenced applications for financial compensation from a number of clubs, saying he was "satisfied" that they had "potential claims". Everton have 14 days from the ruling to lodge an appeal. Edited November 22 by Rob Link to post Share on other sites
Hammy legend 309 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Barnsley have thrown out of the FA Cup for fielding an ineligible player. Link to post Share on other sites
Redcar Rioja 5,056 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 3 hours ago, Hammy legend said: Barnsley have thrown out of the FA Cup for fielding an ineligible player. FA flexing their muscles again. Wonder if it had been one of the top 6 Prem Clubs what would have happened? Carpet and sweeping brush comes to mind via a swingeing £50K fine due to a "technicality" of course. Link to post Share on other sites
Blanco 4,529 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Just now, Redcar Rioja said: FA flexing their muscles again. Wonder if it had been one of the top 6 Prem Clubs what would have happened? Carpet and sweeping brush comes to mind via a swingeing £50K fine due to a "technicality" of course. Barnsley admitted that the player was ineligible. An administrative error is how they described it. Delighted for the really small teams like Horsham that they got justice and get to play in the second round. Could be massive for them in terms of income. Genuinely don’t believe that Man City would be allowed play an ineligible player in the FA Cup or any other big team for that matter. Link to post Share on other sites
ABH 449 Posted November 23 Share Posted November 23 6 hours ago, Blanco said: Barnsley admitted that the player was ineligible. An administrative error is how they described it. Delighted for the really small teams like Horsham that they got justice and get to play in the second round. Could be massive for them in terms of income. Genuinely don’t believe that Man City would be allowed play an ineligible player in the FA Cup or any other big team for that matter. https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11669/11825590/liverpool-avoid-carabao-cup-expulsion-but-fined-over-ineligible-player Link to post Share on other sites
Blanco 4,529 Posted November 23 Share Posted November 23 2 hours ago, ABH said: https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11669/11825590/liverpool-avoid-carabao-cup-expulsion-but-fined-over-ineligible-player Well I take it back. Terrible that the bigger teams get away with this kind of stuff 😡 Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 4,015 Posted November 23 Share Posted November 23 https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/in-your-area/renfrewshire/caolan-boyd-munce-ready-wait-31503650 Caolan Boyd-Munce ready to wait for Northern Ireland debut as St Mirren midfielder opens up on Dundee defeat 'shock' The 23-year-old was an unused substitute for his country against Denmark earlier this week. Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 4,015 Posted November 23 Share Posted November 23 (edited) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12779925/Everton-Burnley-Leeds-Leicester.html EXCLUSIVE: Everton are unhappy £300m compensation claim from Burnley, Leeds and Leicester will be heard by the SAME disciplinary panel that docked them 10 points I'm not sure I get the logic that leeds and leicister have a case, surely only one of them got relegated that would have stayed up had they been docked 10 points last season and the other would of went down. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now