-
Latest Posts
-
Do they? He had 15 clean sheets and only conceded 33 goals. The only stat that says he had a bad season is the one you want to believe means something in volume of saves made, which is a dreadful measure of how good a goalkeeper is. I'll give you an example to try and illustrate my point: If goalkeeper X faces 200 shots and saves 50% of them he'd have 100 saves for the season. If goalkeeper Y only faces 100 shots and saves 80% of them he'd have 80 saves for the season. By your logic goalkeeper X has had the better season, despite letting in significantly more of the shots he's faced. -
I think it's amazing people still call them IversOn and SteffAn - When it's painfully clear that it is Iversen and Steffen 🙃 -
By Dynamo Kev · Posted
johnson probably is to. but hes gone to the prem on a bosman so must be good. i'd say if he was good then someone would have bought him. it doesnt really matter to us either way. Not saying your wrong will but the sats do tell a story. so i wouldnt write them off as being pointless. -
-
By Dynamo Kev · Posted
just picked this off a palace forum. Reading wba forums, it's hard to see him coming in as our No. 1. In fact, he gets worse references than I would give Butland. Kicking and command of his area seem the main criticisms. And being a mistake maker. sooooo the stats say he had a bad season and the fans say he had a bad season. does that make him as bad as lumley? NO thats surely not possible. lol
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now