Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

'Other Boro stuff'


Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Brunners said:

infogol has our xg for at 3.8 & xg against at 3.0

Tied 5th in the Champ for worst xGA

Second best for xGF behind only WBA

Urgh, massive improvement required there. Guess we can't complain about only having 1 point then, although you could also argue that xGF should have us on more points. But thats the price you pay for starting the season with below par strikers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 22.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  •  

    1179

  •  

    1111

  •  

    998

  •  

    814

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A great Athletic article on our youth recruitment in London (copied from the other site): Saturday afternoon in the north London postcode of N22: on White Hart Lane a steady stream of fans make t

Superb article from The Athletic published today... Gives you a real sense that something special is being built. We've been crying out for this for so long.   Michael Walker 2h ago  2 

The Times interview today with Chuba. I’ve missed all the pics out as I don’t know how to get the whole article across and it’s behind a firewall, but you get a good feeling of what he thinks.  

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Borodane said:

Urgh, massive improvement required there. Guess we can't complain about only having 1 point then, although you could also argue that xGF should have us on more points. But thats the price you pay for starting the season with below par strikers.

Yeah it's not ideal, fingers crossed we tighten up as everyone gets used to playing together.

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Brunners said:

We're now up to the highest xG in the league through 3 games. Wednesdays opponents are 2nd & Saturdays are 9th

So we've just about managed to convert our expected goals. Is that good or does it say that our defence is crap. I can't quite figure that out. To me it says we are where we deserve to be unlike Stoke and WBA who are both underperforming goals wise as they should have had more goal and thus more points.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Borodane said:

So we've just about managed to convert our expected goals. Is that good or does it say that our defence is crap. I can't quite figure that out. To me it says we are where we deserve to be unlike Stoke and WBA who are both underperforming goals wise as they should have had more goal and thus more points.

it basically says our defence is crap, yes. To have 2 points from 3 games with the best xG in the league (and an actual goals total that is relatively close) means you're conceding too many.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Borodane said:

So we've just about managed to convert our expected goals. Is that good or does it say that our defence is crap. I can't quite figure that out. To me it says we are where we deserve to be unlike Stoke and WBA who are both underperforming goals wise as they should have had more goal and thus more points.

I don't bother about stats. I just make my opinions based on what I see.

You can tell if a team has problems or not with good old fashioned Mk I eyeballs. 🤷‍♂️ Don't need none of that fancy stats malarkey. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/13/2022 at 3:21 PM, Changing Times said:

Poor Lumley 🤦‍♂️

Royals' boss insisted post match that Lumley should not be singled out for his performance, instead preferring to stress the players win and lose together and that the goalkeeper has already proven what a 'top class' goalkeeper he can be for Reading.

hahahahaha, im assuming the class he was top of was at clown school

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

I don't bother about stats. I just make my opinions based on what I see.

You can tell if a team has problems or not with good old fashioned Mk I eyeballs. 🤷‍♂️ Don't need none of that fancy stats malarkey. 

 

Going by all stats available: You're wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...