Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

'Other Boro stuff'


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RiseAgainst said:

. Honestly, if it's a straight choice between defrauding the taxpayer out of tens of millions of pounds or seeing the club drop out of the league and re-form as a phoenix, let them drop. 

Surely every club, indeed every business, that goes into administration, costs the taxman  money? It used to be the law that HMRC was a preferred creditor and were entitled to all their money before ordinary creditors got paid. Government changed this as people complained it was unfair to other businesses. So any football club now going into administration will cost HMRC and us as taxpayers money.
It’s only defrauding if they are misstating true assets in order to give taxman less that he is entitled to.  Is this happening? I’m sure they are manoeuvring to minimise the taxman’s take, but every administrator will do that and it doesn’t make it illegal in most cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 18.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Superb article from The Athletic published today... Gives you a real sense that something special is being built. We've been crying out for this for so long.   Michael Walker 2h ago  2 

It is emotional blackmail and the situation has been clearly fabricated, if you look at the handwriting its obvious that Wayne Rooney wrote that letter. 

Great quote from Kevin Blackwell in the Athletic today 🤣🤣🤣

Posted Images

Just now, BillyWoofs_shinpad said:

I’m sure that was a minority of fans, there are idiots all over the internet. 

No it was the majority of the fans at the time, you got to remember their chairman was Robert Maxwell who got his son to buy Oxford and use it against the league rules as a nursery club for Derby, and then buy at a massive discount lots of oxfords best players. 

The justice came when Derby qualified for Europe only to get stopped due to the English ban

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ScarBoro said:

Surely every club, indeed every business, that goes into administration, costs the taxman  money? It used to be the law that HMRC was a preferred creditor and were entitled to all their money before ordinary creditors got paid. Government changed this as people complained it was unfair to other businesses. So any football club now going into administration will cost HMRC and us as taxpayers money.
It’s only defrauding if they are misstating true assets in order to give taxman less that he is entitled to.  Is this happening? I’m sure they are manoeuvring to minimise the taxman’s take, but every administrator will do that and it doesn’t make it illegal in most cases.

theres a difference from going in to administration due to business failure and going into adminsitration after getting caught cheating, and using insolvency rules to wipe out debts, whilst refusing to sell assets to reduce your debts yourself

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ScarBoro said:

Surely every club, indeed every business, that goes into administration, costs the taxman  money? It used to be the law that HMRC was a preferred creditor and were entitled to all their money before ordinary creditors got paid. Government changed this as people complained it was unfair to other businesses. So any football club now going into administration will cost HMRC and us as taxpayers money.
It’s only defrauding if they are misstating true assets in order to give taxman less that he is entitled to.  Is this happening? I’m sure they are manoeuvring to minimise the taxman’s take, but every administrator will do that and it doesn’t make it illegal in most cases.

I think what Quantuma are doing is quite far removed from normal administrator work. Other clubs which have ended up in administration have sold key assets to release funds to pay debts to the best extent they can. Derby's admins are flatly refusing to sell anyone in an active transfer window, presumably because they think they can dodge a bullet and finish the season with a squad as strong as they started it. I'm not an administration expert, but I think that's against both the letter and the spirit of the law when it comes to their responsibilities.

Derby County Football Club is worth far more than the money they owe HMRC, so there is no excuse for HMRC not receiving what they're owed. Personally, I couldn't give a toss whether MFC gets a penny out of them - my sympathies lie with (a) Wycombe Wanderers, (b) all the small businesses who are being shafted out of money DCFC owe them for services provided in good faith, and (c) the taxpayer in general - you and me and anyone else reading this in the UK - for enduring another eight-figure hit to tax takings at a time when this country needs every damn penny of taxpayer revenue it can get its hands on.

As for mis-stating true assets, again I'm not an accountant, but isn't selling a stadium worth £20 million to the club's owner for £80 million a pretty definitive case of this?

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Naisby said:

No it was the majority of the fans at the time, you got to remember their chairman was Robert Maxwell who got his son to buy Oxford and use it against the league rules as a nursery club for Derby, and then buy at a massive discount lots of oxfords best players. 

The justice came when Derby qualified for Europe only to get stopped due to the English ban

Sorry I thought you were talking about the current situation. 
 

I agree that at the time I thought Kevin Maxwell’s appointment at Oxford was very fishy, again though I wouldn’t have wanted Derby to be liquidated over it. What are your thoughts on the Falklands war?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RiseAgainst said:

I think what Quantuma are doing is quite far removed from normal administrator work. Other clubs which have ended up in administration have sold key assets to release funds to pay debts to the best extent they can. Derby's admins are flatly refusing to sell anyone in an active transfer window, presumably because they think they can dodge a bullet and finish the season with a squad as strong as they started it. I'm not an administration expert, but I think that's against both the letter and the spirit of the law when it comes to their responsibilities.

Derby County Football Club is worth far more than the money they owe HMRC, so there is no excuse for HMRC not receiving what they're owed. Personally, I couldn't give a toss whether MFC gets a penny out of them - my sympathies lie with (a) Wycombe Wanderers, (b) all the small businesses who are being shafted out of money DCFC owe them for services provided in good faith, and (c) the taxpayer in general - you and me and anyone else reading this in the UK - for enduring another eight-figure hit to tax takings at a time when this country needs every damn penny of taxpayer revenue it can get its hands on.

As for mis-stating true assets, again I'm not an accountant, but isn't selling a stadium worth £20 million to the club's owner for £80 million a pretty definitive case of this?

And terribly fishy if the buyer knows it’s only worth £20m and still pays £84m. Add to this both the buyer and the seller are the same person.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, BillyWoofs_shinpad said:

Many third persons will suffer though won’t they…their fans. 

I can't believe you are willing to let the public pay for the clubs use of money they don't have, just so the fans can have a football team. We're talking money that is owed to the public. That's healthcare, schools etc. Is ok for Derby to spend that money and not repay it?

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone interested in this saga should listen to Simon Jordan from 53 minutes. Explains unequivocally that MFC is NOT the reason for the hold up of the sale. Whatever you think of SJ, he knows Gibson, Morris, the admin and one of the buyers personally. This is tier 1 info, not some Nixon-esque guff.

  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BillyWoofs_shinpad said:

Sorry I thought you were talking about the current situation. 
 

I agree that at the time I thought Kevin Maxwell’s appointment at Oxford was very fishy, again though I wouldn’t have wanted Derby to be liquidated over it. What are your thoughts on the Falklands war?

My points about their fans back in 86 and how they viewed our plight and helped us were pertinent to the topic. I fail to see how the Falklands is. I’m happy to discuss that war especially as it’s going to be the 40th anniversary this year. But if you do it’s best to do it in a different thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Borodane said:

I can't believe you are willing to let the public pay for the clubs use of money they don't have, just so the fans can have a football team. We're talking money that is owed to the public. That's healthcare, schools etc. Is ok for Derby to spend that money and not repay it?

I’m not arguing anything of the sort, I just don’t want Derby to be liquidated, because I care about football and supporters in this country.

I was upset for Bury fans when they were put out of business and for Wimbledon fans when their club was moved to Milton Keynes. 

I totally agree that Derby have done wrong, I totally agree that they had to be punished but I don’t agree with the calls to liquidate them and for generations of supporters to lose their club 

it’s pretty simple really. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SouthernSmoggie said:

Anyone interested in this saga should listen to Simon Jordan from 53 minutes. Explains unequivocally that MFC is NOT the reason for the hold up of the sale. Whatever you think of SJ, he knows Gibson, Morris, the admin and one of the buyers personally. This is tier 1 info, not some Nixon-esque guff.

  

That was a great watch, thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BillyWoofs_shinpad said:

I’m not arguing anything of the sort, I just don’t want Derby to be liquidated, because I care about football and supporters in this country.

I was upset for Bury fans when they were put out of business and for Wimbledon fans when their club was moved to Milton Keynes. 

I totally agree that Derby have done wrong, I totally agree that they had to be punished but I don’t agree with the calls to liquidate them and for generations of supporters to lose their club 

it’s pretty simple really. 

I agree with a lot of what you've said, I just can't appreciate their fans standing up for one side of the debate that is not really working in their best interests either.

These situations are challenging and the fans shouldn't have to be put through them but the administrators are making this worse for them too and they're holding onto them as a vessel of truth within all the noise.

They're just as bad as anyone on this situation but our club is being dragged through the mud by them in public and the same fans who seem to have opened their eyes to Morris' misdeeds are happy to allow Quantuma take the club to the edge of liquidation before coming to the table.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Football fans shouldn’t loose their club because of the nefarious actions of owners, rules and laws govern football in order to try and stop this, sadly there are always folk who are happy to break them in order to get an advantage.

The fans of clubs and the wider communities of football towns and cities are always the collateral victims when these things happen, if equal justice for all could be found in these cases I would happily support it.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wilsoncgp said:

I agree with a lot of what you've said, I just can't appreciate their fans standing up for one side of the debate that is not really working in their best interests either.

These situations are challenging and the fans shouldn't have to be put through them but the administrators are making this worse for them too and they're holding onto them as a vessel of truth within all the noise.

They're just as bad as anyone on this situation but our club is being dragged through the mud by them in public and the same fans who seem to have opened their eyes to Morris' misdeeds are happy to allow Quantuma take the club to the edge of liquidation before coming to the table.

The fans have no say in anything at the end of the day. It’s just internet noise and clickbait articles. 
 

I’m sure many Derby fans are appalled by Morris’ actions, they just don’t go on line to vent their anger. There is a whole world away from forums and social media. It’s good to take a break from time to time, I have and it puts things into perspective.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, SouthernSmoggie said:

Anyone interested in this saga should listen to Simon Jordan from 53 minutes. Explains unequivocally that MFC is NOT the reason for the hold up of the sale. Whatever you think of SJ, he knows Gibson, Morris, the admin and one of the buyers personally. This is tier 1 info, not some Nixon-esque guff.

  

Interesting. Simon Jordan says that Gibson has agreements to deal with the case with 2 of 3 interested parties. I think it's safe to speculate that one of them is Ashley. I wonder if the one he doesn't have an agreement with is the one made up of current and former Derby directors, who you may speculate would continue acting with Morris' best interests in mind...

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • imo, anyone who criticises Marcus T either doesn't see us playing very often or doesn't have a particularly good understanding of the game. Not meaning to sound harsh, but his contribution to the team is very clear to see. He's not perfect by any means, but then not many players are, especially at this level. If you're just simply looking for players to criticise then there are usually about 8 or 9 players you should start with before Mr T each game  
    • I honestly believe a full season under Wilder in the LCM role would show everyone just how good he is. I think if you took him out of our midfield you'd see how bad and unbalanced it is. McGree and Crooks won't work because neither of them cover enough ground or do the defensive side of the game.  Howson I love but let's be honest he's not a traditional out and out CDM. He losses the ball too often in bad positions and his positioning for CDM can be quite poor. He brings commitment, energy and workrate though.  For me in midfield we need a LWB, CDM and an RCM. I would drop Crooks to the bench or move him on. I know that he's scored ten goals this season but I believe we can sign players that more suit Wilders system with energy, pressing and intensity. I would keep him for the bench but personally would look to replace him in the starting team. Tavernier was in the Top 10 for both Key Passes and Tackles Won. He was ranked 3rd for passes in the final third. He's expected goals and assists combined for this season was 15. I could see him getting 15-20 goal contributions in a full season under Wilder. He had 10 this season and has shown real signs of improvement. He does a lot more than what people realise for the team.  Tavernier was given corners because he was the only real left-footed option in the team. I do agree though that most of his deliveries were relatively poor considering he's our designated corner kick tacker they didn't look practiced.
    • Wouldn't call it interesting personally (i.e. not sure what there is to draw from it), think it just reinforces the club are happy they moved on from him. I can't remember the last time they did a season long goals montage so I could be wrong but it feels like this alone is a little out of the ordinary and perhaps only put together because Wilder is at the helm. I think the club is just continuing to want to push Wilder and positivity around him, that's how they approached the Season Card campaign too. It's not necessarily wanting to reflect on the season just gone as a whole but more to give an idea of what's to come.
    • I don't think corner taking ability is really something that pushes someone over that £10m threshold. He can be both one of our better corner takers, and still not be a particularly good corner taker, but that really feels like grasping at straws for something to still criticise him with. 
    • For what it’s worth with Tav, I genuinely think he would flourish as a left wing back, and simplified his game.  Tav travels well with the ball, is energetic and I can’t fault his work ethic at all. He always puts a shift in. But I just think he could use it so much better than he is currently doing from watching him this season. I still think he has some work to do in the final third, which ironically was where we struggled most to break teams down. I just don’t think he’s there yet and I don’t think he does a job which an additional player in midfielder couldn’t do (he’s replaceable).   For a player who takes corners, you’d expect better delivery on a more consistent basis for him to be worth 10m + which some are quoting on various platforms.    I realise that Tav is very polarised on the opinion poll. Like I say, I don’t hate him and think he’s ‘bad’, he’s just not consistent enough yet to be deemed as integral to how we play in midfield in my view  

×
×
  • Create New...