Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
LukeR

'Other Boro stuff'

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Borodane said:

Again why would he? It's a completely irrelevant point as he wouldn't have anything to do with the EFL if we were in the Premier League.

Spending money you have is allowed while spending money you don't have is not allowed which is the crux of FFP so I have no problem with relegated clubs on parachute payments spending huge. It usually means that Championship clubs get decent value for players they sell. It doesn't really work out anyway in a lot of cases.

Because if he had such strong principles about FFP and abiding by the rules then I think he'd still care about clubs flouting the rules regardless of whether it was the PL or EFL. I didn't hear him complain about other clubs when we were trying to buy promotion under Garry Monk.

You either see this sort of thing as black and white or different shades of grey. Clubs have been using clever accounting to get around FFP for a few years now. None of our fans complained when we bought Jordan Rhodes in 2016 with money basically borrowed from future Premier league revenue.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's too hypocritical. Spending big and then cost cutting when it doesn't work isn't the same as spending big and then cheating when it doesn't work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"If you’ve got a player who’s worth £50m you can use that. We didn’t use a loophole, let’s be very clear on this. The rules are extremely specific – the sale of a fixed asset is allowable.”

 

This is mel morris comments on the situation. I think it's a bit disingenuous because if you had a player worth 50m you're unlikely to sell him to your own shell company and then rent him back for half the price.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ThisIzLeon said:

Not too sure if this is allowed here so feel free to delete/move this post. Has anyone got any experience using ExpressVPN or NordVPN? If so which is the best for streaming through the Boro website? My apologies if this isn't allowed here.

I use nord VPN. Think either would work fine for the Boro website though. Just remember to get use topcashback or similar - I got 3 years worth for about £40 after cashback.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brunners said:

"If you’ve got a player who’s worth £50m you can use that. We didn’t use a loophole, let’s be very clear on this. The rules are extremely specific – the sale of a fixed asset is allowable.”

 

This is mel morris comments on the situation. I think it's a bit disingenuous because if you had a player worth 50m you're unlikely to sell him to your own shell company and then rent him back for half the price.

In fact, more than unlikely, selling a player to a private non-football club company is illegal under English football's laws. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, boro-unger said:

I use nord VPN. Think either would work fine for the Boro website though. Just remember to get use topcashback or similar - I got 3 years worth for about £40 after cashback.

Nice one man, I will check that out! How reliable is NordVPN when streaming from the boro website?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say he's making much sense comparing a stadium to a football player when talking about 'fixed assets' either. Surely players are temporary assets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, ThisIzLeon said:

Nice one man, I will check that out! How reliable is NordVPN when streaming from the boro website?

I use Chrome extension of Windscribe which has always worked fine for games can't make gives 10GB free every month which is fine if just want to stream the odd Boro away game 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DurhamRed said:

I use Chrome extension of Windscribe which has always worked fine for games can't make gives 10GB free every month which is fine if just want to stream the odd Boro away game 

Nice one mate, i will look into this as well. I live at the bottom of the map so getting to home games is borderline impossible without planning and a good bit of cash. I always try to get to the away games within 3 hours from here though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ThisIzLeon said:

Nice one man, I will check that out! How reliable is NordVPN when streaming from the boro website?

Fine. I think the other factors such as your Internet speed and your computer/tablet will have more of an impact on the reliability than which VPN you use though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Will said:

The legality of it surely depends on the validity of the 'independent' valuation they got on the stadium. If it can be proven that the stadium's true value was £40m then they have potentially broken the law, not just FFP.

This is exactly what they are checking this time around. In terms of the EFL's Profit and Sustainability Rules (FFP) Derby have done nothing wrong and in business it is not unusual to have intercompany transactions. But if they have unfairly valued the stadium, this is where they may find themselves in hot water. 

I think when this first broke, in terms of it being public knowledge that they had sold their stadium to themselves, I mentioned then about the new value of the stadium. I'm amazed it has taken the EFL this long to even look into the valuation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, its because the EFL are a bunch of lazy duds who’d rather sit on their hands than take action against a club. Isn’t it also a problem that Mel Morris is on the EFL board? Surely they should have some sort of independent division to investigate member clubs. Like the internal affairs in the police. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simon Jordan was talking about this on Talk Sport with Jim White and he spoke a lot of sense. Felt as he understood Gibson's reasons but seemingly that Gibson would probably lose out eventually

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Borodane said:

Dan, its because the EFL are a bunch of lazy duds who’d rather sit on their hands than take action against a club. Isn’t it also a problem that Mel Morris is on the EFL board? Surely they should have some sort of independent division to investigate member clubs. Like the internal affairs in the police. 

This is the same EFL that stood by and watched as Bury slipped out of existence, so I really shouldn't be surprised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • Assombalonga wasn't a mythical striker who scored goals for fun at this level though.  He scored 15 goals and then 14 goals before he joined us.  He then scored 15 goals and 14 goals for us.  We got exactly what we paid for, it's just that we paid far too much for him in the first place.  I'm not sure what it is about this that people don't get, unless they convinced themselves he was a 20+ striker somehow? Hugill is a beast of a striker.  The best season Hugill has had at this level was last season when he scored 13 goals.  He's only ever hit double figures twice at this level.  When they played in the same team, Hugill got 6 goals, Assombalonga got 14, albeit Assombalonga played more minutes, but he didn't play double the minutes.  Ah, but Hugill is the better all round player.  Hugill has 7 assists in his career at this level, Assombalonga has 6.  Hugill is a beast, Assombalonga is rubbish 🤷‍♂️ I think the bigger problem we have is the expectations that we place on some of these players.  The likes of Boyd and McDonald were players who had done ok at a relatively weak level of competition only.  Rhodes did well at this level but in a different set up to the one he joined when he came here, and we made no attempt to replicate that - that's one reason why an owner shouldn't decide to buy players. I'd say that we have three strikers who appear to be much of a muchness.  I doubt any of them would hit 20 a season at this level, they'd all top out at around 15 I reckon.  All you can do, as you mention, is attempt to play to their strengths as much as possible, or accept that if you don't then you will get inconsistent performances.  15 goals a season from a striker is fine, unless you spent £15m on that striker, in which case that's your own fault for not understanding what you are purchasing.
    • Similar thoughts to Changing Times. I don't have that much interest in returning until the crowds are back properly.
    • I cannot believe some are still trying to defend Britt! Must be to save face. As a player, he has gone backwards. 2 goals in 2 games can easily be misconstrued. His first, everyone’s granny could have bscored that. The penalty? Good penalty. This fails to cover up his deficiencies. The guy should be working on his game - maybe he is. Frankly, if this is the case it isn’t working. He is one of the weakest links we have.
    • Thanks for that. Seen a few reports about the test games but they only tell you about the seating arrangements 
    • Hey Erimus, fancy missing out Mel Nurse. A Boro Captain too. A bit before your time 😳
×
×
  • Create New...