Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

'Other Boro stuff'


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Uwe said:

I’m as Happy as anyone that it’s been overturned. But if it hadn’t I could kind of seen why it hasn’t even though it would’ve annoyed me. 
 

The fact that Karen Nelson had to spend upwards of 8 hours graft putting together a whole dossier proved that it wasn’t as easy either way to prove/disprove and it could have gone either way. 
 

Also this “I told you so” stuff is childish as hell. We need to be a little bit more respectful of others opinions. But that’s just my opinion 🤷‍♂️

People should be more respectful of my opinions because they are always correct but I bet they won't 😭

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 14.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Great quote from Kevin Blackwell in the Athletic today 🤣🤣🤣

It's my birthday today, meant to be my 30th but I've refused to allow that in current circumstances of not being able to celebrate it. I usually get my age on the back of one of my shirts so I re

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/neil-warnock-obvious-choice-manage-18614026.amp?__twitter_impression=true "Gibson is a hands-on owner and Bausor is a hands-on chief exe

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, Humpty said:

I’m not dying on any hill. It’s just my opinion, in the same way it was the opinion of the ref and linesman that the challenge was a red card. I wouldn’t worry about it.

It wasn't the opinion of the ref though, I keep correcting you on this. It was the opinion of the linesman who was 30 yards away and couldn't see it and the ref deferred to him for some stupid reason.

It's alright to admit you were wrong sometimes mate, no one is right all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair to @Humpty, when I saw it live and also looking at the GIF Wilson posted in the matchday thread, to me it looked like the red was deserving. As from those 2 angles there looked to be a point both McNair's feet were off the ground and it looked like he contacted Bacuna before the ball. Obviously they are the only 2 angles I saw, and I imagine the dossier provided there could be more angles that show otherwise. 

Anyway I'm glad it has been overturned as I think all of us can agree that McNair is quite an important player for us.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Changing Times said:

People should be more respectful of my opinions because they are always correct but I bet they won't 😭

What's odd is from my final sentence of the post above I was going to say no one is right all the time, unless you ask CT, who will tell you he is right 100% of the time 😂, but deleted it.

I refresh and there you are 😂

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

To be fair to @Humpty, when I saw it live and also looking at the GIF Wilson posted in the matchday thread, to me it looked like the red was deserving. As from those 2 angles there looked to be a point both McNair's feet were off the ground and it looked like he contacted Bacuna before the ball. Obviously they are the only 2 angles I saw, and I imagine the dossier provided there could be more angles that show otherwise. 

Anyway I'm glad it has been overturned as I think all of us can agree that McNair is quite an important player for us.

He didn't and it's just clearly obvious to anyone with eyes, honestly.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

Weird hill to die on mate, everyone knowing you're wrong but refusing to admit it...but whatever floats your boat I guess

I've yet to see what Brunners told me to have a look at so I'll check that out at some point and maybe adjust my stance but I still stand by my judgement of what I saw until then. I don't quite understand why that part of this is so important to you. We're all talking about our judgement of what we saw and until what we see changes, why would we change our opinions of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Brunners said:

He didn't and it's just clearly obvious to anyone with eyes, honestly.

So obvious that the Ref gave the red despite being in the best position to see it? Yes the linesman said it was a red but surely if it was that obvious the ref would have overruled him? Or maybe at full speed it wasn't that obvious?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DanFromDownSouth said:

So obvious that the Ref gave the red despite being in the best position to see it? Yes the linesman said it was a red but surely if it was that obvious the ref would have overruled him? Or maybe at full speed it wasn't that obvious?

The ref wasn't even going to give a yellow.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Brunners said:

What's odd is from my final sentence of the post above I was going to say no one is right all the time, unless you ask CT, who will tell you he is right 100% of the time 😂, but deleted it.

I refresh and there you are 😂

I'm watching you

 Arnold Schwarzenegger Reaction GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

I've yet to see what Brunners told me to have a look at so I'll check that out at some point and maybe adjust my stance but I still stand by my judgement of what I saw until then. I don't quite understand why that part of this is so important to you. We're all talking about our judgement of what we saw and until what we see changes, why would we change our opinions of it?

Exactly, it’s no different from the debate that you and I had over the Fry incident a couple of weeks ago. In my opinion, neither incident deserved a red card, I’m glad this one was rescinded, but many others might think otherwise, that’s fair enough, no point making a massive song and dance about someone else’s opinion. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

So obvious that the Ref gave the red despite being in the best position to see it? Yes the linesman said it was a red but surely if it was that obvious the ref would have overruled him? Or maybe at full speed it wasn't that obvious?

The ref got talked into it by a linesman that couldn't see it. Don't ask me why he did that, but that doesn't make it any more correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

The ref wasn't even going to give a yellow.

Is this even true or is this just your opinion? The ref had his hand in his pocket as soon as it happened. He gave the foul as soon as the challenge went in and his hand goes straight to his pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brunners said:

The ref got talked into it by a linesman that couldn't see it. Don't ask me why he did that, but that doesn't make it any more correct.

But surely if it was that incorrect and obvious then the ref would have said no it isn't a red. The fact he was talked out of it kind of makes me think the ref himself wasn't sure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • If Muniz does fall through we really do need to get some players in sharpish We've lost 30 goals from the players who've left, including 6 of our 8 top scorers (assuming Akpom leaves) and so far have brought in 15 goals with Ikpeazu, Crooks and Ameobi  This for a side that's already notoriously low scoring and lacking in creativity What worries me is the absence of links to wingers and attacking midfielders other than Lazaro and a few washed up has beens  11 days till Fulham...    
    • What will happen is; Muniz will go to Athletico We will bid for Lazaro We will agree a deal for Lazaro  Fulham will bid for lazaro We will buy Smith from Rotherham
    • Get begging Muniz to join us Twitter link
    • He will undoubtedly sign for Fulham and play for one of the most inoffensive clubs in English football in one of the least intimidating grounds in England.  He won't have a clue though. 
    • Yeah that is what I meant. Fulham never technically beat us to Bryan. They beat Villa to him. We were technically not in running for Bryan as far as player was concerned. His 3rd and final choice.

×
×
  • Create New...