Hang on, you're saying Bamford isn't worth as much as Britt? Based on what? If you only go off what Leeds paid for Bamford and what we paid for Britt then yeah, you're gonna come to that conclusion. But who were the winners in that scenario?
I don't think Britt is worth £10m, Bamford probably isn't either but if it's an argument about who is worth more, who is the better player, who would be more difficult for a club to sign, Bamford wins that hands down.
Any transfer fee or wage related comments can you please refrain from using them in this thread.
Can I please direct you to the thread, entitled "The Best Thread In The World!", specifically created by CT, for him and his "Nerds".
Thank you for your continued co-operation.
I just don't get these ambiguous valuations picked out of the air, so they're £15mill plus but Bamford isn't £6m?
Not that it matters anyway, valuation and worth are subjective to the buyers and sellers I.e. the clubs so fan valuations are irrelevant.
You'd have to be a top scorer in the league to be in that bracket, and that might not even be enough. I'd say Bamford was about a 10 mil. player when he broke through with us all those years ago, but it's gone downhill since. He's not a player a Prem team would look at anymore and that puts him further down regarding a fee.