Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Recommended Posts

I think the question will be less Carayol vs Kamara and more Carayol vs Ledesma when Tomlin comes into the team and Adomah is fully fit. Who offers more? Myself, I prefer Ledesma to start and Carayol to come on. If ledesma has a poor couple of games in a row, switch out for Carayol to start and vice versa. How great is it to actually have options in the wide positions, must be the first time for a very very long time (since we've never had a great right winger in recent years)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 380
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Carayol has been brilliant lately, whereas Ledesma has faded so Carayol must start ahead of him. I seem to remember Peterborough's chairman saying that Tomlin works very well with pace around him so he could thrive with Carayol and Adomah down the wings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just what Emnes needs, the opportunity for a reality check. He will realise with Swansea that he is not the great footballer that he thinks he is and that he is not good enough for the PL. Experts on here have defended him in the past "confidence player that lacks confidence" Not true IMO, He is the epitome of the football mercenary, no loyalty, lazy, petulant and has an over inflated ego. Good riddance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carayol has been brilliant lately, whereas Ledesma has faded so Carayol must start ahead of him. I seem to remember Peterborough's chairman saying that Tomlin works very well with pace around him so he could thrive with Carayol and Adomah down the wings.

 

Fair point on Carayol, but I also think that in general, Carayol has more bad games than Ledesma does. When Ledesma is not in the game he is at least still decent at picking out a pass and can always score from distance. When Carayols having an off day all he does is run into the first man over and over and is an almost cert to lose the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Latest Posts

    • We finished exactly where I expected us to, in all honesty. Always found the talk of play offs baffling when we just about stayed up last year and didn't improve the squad in any meaningful way.  You can get promoted with average players and a great manager (likes of Leeds, Sheff Utd, Burnley) or you can just have a bigger squad with much better players than everyone else (Bournemouth, Watford, WBA, Fulham etc). Then you get Wolves, Norwich, Newcastle that have both and walk the league.  We had the money to make a bigger, better squad than everyone else and blew it... We've also had about 5 opportunities to get the manager right. Now we have neither and that won't be changing over the summer, so I think people need to be realistic. Is Gibson working behind the scenes to bring in an ambitious, upcoming Bundesliga manager to take over Warnock's steady mid-table ship? Find it hard to believe personally.  Foreign billionaire fancies an investment in the north east? Again, highly doubt it... and careful what you wish for anyway and all that. We're a mid-table Championship side until a big catalyst comes in. 
    • I just can't see where the money is going to come from judging from the club accounts and Bulkhauls horrendous year. Unless sales are happening
    • As mentioned above I do feel the lack of depth and quality in the first half of the season had an impact with us unable to rotate and rest players in our squad meaning we struggled in the 2nd half of the season. The likes of Mcnair were playing 4 games in 8-9 days with the international breaks but we didn't have any option to rest him given injuries and lack of quality to cover him. I think we were only a point off Watford when we got to January. Unfortunately our 3 loanees came with a lack of match sharpness requiring time to settle and then we lost the likes of Tav Dijksteel and Fry at important parts of the season. I agree with the second part I do worry with giving Warnock significant money considering he has probably got no more than 12 months left with us. It would be a huge gamble and if it goes wrong it sets us back another few years. However we need a fair few signings to even get on par regarding the standard of our squad for this season.   
    • We were certainly worse after January but the 3 players we brought in hardly kicked a ball in the first half of the season and required several weeks if not months to get up to standard. I feel if they had all joined in the summer it would have eased the burden on the squad by giving us more depth and quality after a few weeks of the season. It would have eased the pressure and overplaying the likes of Taverner who ended up getting injured with nobody to come in to effectively replace him. I think our poor form in the 2nd half of the season would have been impacted by 'burnout' when you think about the amount of games several players were having to play. Howson and Mcnair examples of players who struggled towards the end of season. I do worry for next season though as we are going to need at least 6-7 new signings to replace what we have lost and probably a couple more on top of that to be seen as a strengthened team unless our academy players are able to make the step up. Im not sure I have faith in us completing so many signings this summer.  
    • The point being none settled in and we just got worse as the season rolled on and finally give up. A centre back is not what we needed but a new manager. How the hell SG can put faith and money in NW is simply financial suicide.  

×
×
  • Create New...