Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Weasel

Boro vs Fulham (A) 3-4

Recommended Posts

Tiendalli has been written off far too early after one bad game in a very poor team performance. He should have settled into our team far more with the time he has been here so I wouldn't be surprised if he started on Saturday.

 

If Vossen is unavailable then that could mean that Tomlin will go back to #10 role with someone else coming in at LW. Reach would be the most likely to come in at LW, well unless Karanka is to take Bamford out of strike, and put him RW with Adomah LW with Kike being our striker. Forshaw did do well in #10 role last Friday though so that would mean we wouldn't have to disrupt things too much. Would be a difficult decision

 

Couldn't agree more. Tiendalli did ok for me at Watford - didn't pull up any trees but certainly wasn't terrible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope everyone who is going makes as much noise as possible to make it sound like a home game to spur the boys on! Be The Twelfth Man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no doubt the vocal support from the Boro will be awesome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gazette.. Adomah, Bamford and Vossen could all miss this game... With the playoffs still a likely outcome would you risk any of them?...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gazette.. Adomah, Bamford and Vossen could all miss this game... With the playoffs still a likely outcome would you risk any of them?...

 

If they are not fit they are not fit.

 

A front line of Reach, tomlin, Nsue and Kike still isn't bad. I suspect at least on of the three will play though. And one or more will make the bench. Don't think all three is going to miss out entirely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smoke screen from the EG, at least two if not all three will play.Mind games starting me thinks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully mind games to a degree but if so fully expect to see either Ledesma or Wildscut on the bench

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Bamford was okay to play 60 minutes with the injury when it was fresh, I imagine he'll be okay to play with it after a week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also fully expect all three to play. Good thing about these days is we can slip kike, tomlin, reach, nsue and a few other in without loosing too much quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe Bamford was struggling as much as it looked against Norwich because risking him at this stage of the season would be madness especially when we had Kike on the bench..

I think the only one who might miss the game is Vossen but I hope he and the rest of the players were instructed at half time to play on any potential injury's.

Hopefully all our players are fit and ready to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other good thing about this game is (I think) Watford play early and Bournemouth play on the monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other good thing about this game is (I think) Watford play early and Bournemouth play on the monday.

I agree, It spreads out the excitement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone fancy Adam Clayton getting his first Boro goal on Saturday enough to put a bet on it??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If everyone is fit then play the same lads that did the job against norwich. If not the my team would be

 

Dimi

Fredericks-Ayala-Gibson-Friend

Leadbitter-Clayton

Ledesma-Tomlin-Reach

Kike

 

I can't stand Ledesma but I think he is the type of player that could just pop up with a bit of magic. The other 89 minutes hell be awful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Latest Posts

    • So you're absolutely 100% fine with the topic people are actually discussing in the thread, the same topic people have been discussing over the course of at least 2 years. No problems there at all, we've had numerous different levels of feelings on this as it's quite a broad topic, we discuss the benefits of his tenure as chairman and the mistakes he's made which have taken us from good positions to bad positions. And as with every discussion, you'll get some who are wholeheartedly for one side of the discussion or the other and are beyond reasoning with, that is not something new in any form of discussion on this forum either. Your entire problem with this appears to be with the thread title and the use of the word abolish. So I say we abolish you. Do you care? I suspect you actually don't because I also suspect you recognise that it's a joke. I don't literally want you forcefully removed from the forum. Just as I suspect nobody wants Gibson literally taken to the gallows, to the guillotine, burnt alive, whatever you are taking from this word. You recognise it's something made in jest and still have a problem with it. I suspect even club officials who read this forum are aware it's a bloody joke, mate.
    • 6 or 7 bottles of it and you'll have a banging headache that makes you wish you were abolished! 
    • You won't be the first person to ask for that on here! 
    • We had people on here complaining about not being invited to fans forums and we regularly get people on here looking down their noses at other forums.  Then we have a thread about abolishing the chairman, I'm not sure you can have it both ways.  Why don't one of you go to a fans forum and ask if the chairman should be abolished? Or stand with a placard outside the ground with the same message and see what response you get.  Even though the person posting the title is doing it in jest I don't think its a good look for the forum either.  Gibson's decision making hasn't been great, I've criticised him as much as anyone on here. Its a completely valid discussion to be had. But you can't paint yourselves as being morally superior to other message boards then post a topic about abolishing the chairman. 
×
×
  • Create New...