BorofaninCanada 12 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 So are we getting Rashford on loan then? Wishful thinking? I'd take a rapid striker if Rhodes is going? I would still like Rhodes to get a crack at the Prem. Maybe that's being sentimental! Link to post Share on other sites
MacLeanBunn 0 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 If we need to make space in the squad I'd rather loan Nugent than sell Rhodes. Bringing in someone new just before the deadline doesn't seem well planned. I'm hoping it's just a rumour. Link to post Share on other sites
Duckand 18 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think Rhodes is going to start against Fulham, and thats why he wasnt included today. Othervice, it could be that Nugent has just trained better. -remember the constant changing of reserve goalies last season. And nugent is more suited for an away match then Rhodes cause og his workrate. All these reasons are all as plausible or more then a potential fall out with Karanka, which we really have no evidence of. If he is not included against Fulham, then I am more surprised. Link to post Share on other sites
boromutt 0 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think Rhodes is going to start against Fulham, and thats why he wasnt included today. Othervice, it could be that Nugent has just trained better. -remember the constant changing of reserve goalies last season. And nugent is more suited for an away match then Rhodes cause og his workrate. All these reasons are all as plausible or more then a potential fall out with Karanka, which we really have no evidence of. If he is not included against Fulham, then I am more surprised. Rhodes grandfather passed away beginning of the week so club have given him some time off there's no conspiracy. Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,982 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think Rhodes is going to start against Fulham, and thats why he wasnt included today. Othervice, it could be that Nugent has just trained better. -remember the constant changing of reserve goalies last season. And nugent is more suited for an away match then Rhodes cause og his workrate. All these reasons are all as plausible or more then a potential fall out with Karanka, which we really have no evidence of. If he is not included against Fulham, then I am more surprised. Rhodes grandfather passed away beginning of the week so club have given him some time off there's no conspiracy. I thought that was last week? Link to post Share on other sites
Neverbefore 10,942 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think Rhodes is going to start against Fulham, and thats why he wasnt included today. Othervice, it could be that Nugent has just trained better. -remember the constant changing of reserve goalies last season. And nugent is more suited for an away match then Rhodes cause og his workrate. All these reasons are all as plausible or more then a potential fall out with Karanka, which we really have no evidence of. If he is not included against Fulham, then I am more surprised. Rhodes grandfather passed away beginning of the week so club have given him some time off there's no conspiracy. I thought that was last week? He's got two grandads like Link to post Share on other sites
Rioch's Braves 711 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think its madness if we get rid of Rhodes before he has a chance in the PL, every one who talks about him and has played with him says he's a finisher, so I'm hoping its BS and not one of another Karanka's fall outs. Link to post Share on other sites
Tony 54 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 Karanka's comments in the Gazette say the journalist is wrong but he doesn't seem very convincing in what he said. Maybe he mistakenly used the wrong words but he said "I hope" when asked if he would still be here when the window shuts. Gazette also says that he wasn't selected for tactical reasons. His grandad died on the Saturday before the Stoke game but Karanka didn't say anything about him being on compassionate leave. If it was as simple as that you'd think he would have said that to squash the rumour. It is also possible that Rhodes might be the one who wants out. He might want to play every week and sometimes an important persons death in your life can make you evaluate things. Might also be why Nixon who is suppose to be close to his camp has released the article to try and drum up interest. Link to post Share on other sites
Arskite 75 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I agree that Karanka's comments were a bit weird. I don't really believe he was left out for "tactical reasons", so I don't know what's up. It'll come out this week I suppose (if there is anything to come out). We'll need to get moving in the transfer market as well, whether he stays or goes. Link to post Share on other sites
boksicdink 1,942 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 Maybe Rhodes just wants some privacy during the loss a family member and AK is being respectful of that. Most people don't want their private lives sharing with the world Link to post Share on other sites
richmfc 41 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I agree that Karanka's comments were a bit weird. I don't really believe he was left out for "tactical reasons", so I don't know what's up. It'll come out this week I suppose (if there is anything to come out). We'll need to get moving in the transfer market as well, whether he stays or goes. You could be right but also I doubt we need two forwards on the bench away from home Link to post Share on other sites
Smoggydownsouth 1,621 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 I think his comments said it all. I think he will be gone by sept! Think Ross Mc was AK's player choice and Rhodes was SG Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,982 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 He did also sa he's not going and to tell the journalist the story is wrong. Sounds pretty definite to me. Link to post Share on other sites
Prowler 197 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 Villa are trying to sign a No. 9 apparently... Link to post Share on other sites
"KM" 1,656 Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 He did also sa he's not going and to tell the journalist the story is wrong. Sounds pretty definite to me. He was definite about Tomlin's stomach bug as well. ;) Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts