CFPri25 12 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Link to post Share on other sites
Tudders80 674 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Just wait for the Gazette to come up with a random figure that they think is either massively inflated or stupidly low and the club will come out and correct It!! Link to post Share on other sites
Dan1234 1,048 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Can't believe we actually got money for him. Some good business this window. Link to post Share on other sites
Borodane 6,246 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Was about to write that. Makes a mockery of their own statement from a few days ago hence making themselves look like a joke. Their media handling leaves ALOT to be desired. Everyone knew this was going to be a standard phrase with future deals. Link to post Share on other sites
LinoJo3 3,098 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Do people actually care that much about this stuff? Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Do people actually care that much about this stuff? It's just pathetic tbh. Link to post Share on other sites
Will 2,958 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Well at least our supremes overlords at the club can now decide when and when not to disclose the fee to us. Of course we'll soon be told that transparency isn't always what we want, and sometimes it better for us that we aren't told. Link to post Share on other sites
BoroDave4 974 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Was about to write that. Makes a mockery of their own statement from a few days ago hence making themselves look like a joke. Their media handling leaves ALOT to be desired. Everyone knew this was going to be a standard phrase with future deals. It could be that Girona have poor in the privacy clause. Let's say they've offered £4m but insist on a privacy clause, take the money all day Link to post Share on other sites
Nauser 35 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Was about to write that. Makes a mockery of their own statement from a few days ago hence making themselves look like a joke. Their media handling leaves ALOT to be desired. Everyone knew this was going to be a standard phrase with future deals. It could be from Girona's side. They might not want others to know how much they're spending. Bernardo's move was also undisclosed, so there is a trend coming out of their side. All conjecture on my part, though. Link to post Share on other sites
Snowblind 1,711 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Well, after 2 years the Pro-Stuani Clique looks set to disband. It's a sad day for us members - all, I think, 2 of us - that this day has eventually darkened our members suite door step. The much revered 'Dark 'n' Stuani' cocktail recipe will have to be set aside, never to be sipped again. @BWS - A sad day, my friend. :( Link to post Share on other sites
richmfc 41 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Friday really is THE day isn't it Link to post Share on other sites
I_Shot_JR 1 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Was about to write that. Makes a mockery of their own statement from a few days ago hence making themselves look like a joke. Their media handling leaves ALOT to be desired. Everyone knew this was going to be a standard phrase with future deals. Come on... If Girona don't want the fee to be known and insert a privacy clause then what are the club going to do? Say no thanks and cancel the deal? It happens all the time. Link to post Share on other sites
Tudders80 674 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Do people actually care that much about this stuff? When it makes the club look I support look stupid....and a little dodgy...then yes. And yes, I know it isn't strictly dodgy but when we are asking for transparency in football....with the likes of pogbas deal going to fifa then why can't they all just be disclosed. Everyone is then in the same boat and rifts don't need to be created between the clubs and the institutions that support them Link to post Share on other sites
JMC91 280 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Sad to see Stuani go, given us a few real stand-out memories that will last a long time. Though I feel he's gone without us ever having seen the best of him and I don't think I could bare watching him play wide again as he just looked completely lost at times (usually just before popping up at the far post with an important goal). His record and strengths suggest he could have had a much greater impact if played as a striker, maybe there is something that the football layman doesn't see in him that managers do. Don't think he fits the bill for the system of fast wide-men that Monk apparently prefers so probably best for all that he moves on. Link to post Share on other sites
wilsoncgp 9,230 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 The fee will remain private "Due to a privacy clause within the transfer deal we are unable to make the fee public." I've stayed out of the argument so far but that is really pathetic. You can't have it both ways. Was about to write that. Makes a mockery of their own statement from a few days ago hence making themselves look like a joke. Their media handling leaves ALOT to be desired. Everyone knew this was going to be a standard phrase with future deals. Come on... If Girona don't want the fee to be known and insert a privacy clause then what are the club going to do? Say no thanks and cancel the deal? It happens all the time. This. Girona offer the most money then probably suggest we don't tell the public what it is as part of that deal. The buying club surely has the upper hand there. If they request it be a private fee then fee remains private. Don't really see what the club can do there. Do they turn down the better offer because other deals would have publicly shown fees? Give over you lot. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts