Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Boro v Hull City 3-1 (Gestede (2) Bamford)


Recommended Posts

I predict we will start with four defensive midfielders due to us playing mighty Hull and both sides will be warned by the referee at half time for 'non aggresion', just like in boxing. Seriously, apathy has set in, we will probably win this one nil, but in the greater scheme of things it will not matter, and we will end up around tenth in the table, which is exactly where this team deserves to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I might be in the minority but I wouldn't mind trying the 3 man midfield again, I think it could be a positive system if we actually want to show some attacking intent.

 

It could allow Howson to play the sort of role Lampard played at Chelsea where he had freedom to arrive late into the box. There's no role for Downing in that shape though because I think we need two attack minded wide players in Adama and Harrison.

 

Systems and formations are irrelevant though really, any shape can be attacking minded if you want it to be. Unfortunately with us at the moment you expect us to be cautious to the extreme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be in the minority but I wouldn't mind trying the 3 man midfield again, I think it could be a positive system if we actually want to show some attacking intent.

 

It could allow Howson to play the sort of role Lampard played at Chelsea where he had freedom to arrive late into the box. There's no role for Downing in that shape though because I think we need two attack minded wide players in Adama and Harrison.

 

Systems and formations are irrelevant though really, any shape can be attacking minded if you want it to be. Unfortunately with us at the moment you expect us to be cautious to the extreme.

 

I don't want to see a three man midfield with the players we have but if I HAD to it would be with Downing in there instead of Leadbitter. He offers a lot more going forward alongside Howson. Harrison and Adama either side of Britt. But with the personel we have I want 4-4-2

 

Randolph

Shotton-Ayala-Gibbo-Friend

Traore-Howson-Besic-Downing

Britt-Bamford

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone expecting a change in style or tactical set up are dreamers . Pulis is not suddenly going to change his philosophies ,maybe a small tweak in the centre of the park but thats about it . 

the best i can hope for is  dropping constant poor performers and  pedestrian players  but at present  all our forwards  are poor or off form  so its a bit depressing .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be in the minority but I wouldn't mind trying the 3 man midfield again, I think it could be a positive system if we actually want to show some attacking intent.

 

It could allow Howson to play the sort of role Lampard played at Chelsea where he had freedom to arrive late into the box. There's no role for Downing in that shape though because I think we need two attack minded wide players in Adama and Harrison.

 

Systems and formations are irrelevant though really, any shape can be attacking minded if you want it to be. Unfortunately with us at the moment you expect us to be cautious to the extreme.

 

I don't want to see a three man midfield with the players we have but if I HAD to it would be with Downing in there instead of Leadbitter. He offers a lot more going forward alongside Howson. Harrison and Adama either side of Britt. But with the personel we have I want 4-4-2

 

Randolph

Shotton-Ayala-Gibbo-Friend

Traore-Howson-Besic-Downing

Britt-Bamford

 

Yeah I'd be happy playing Downing in a midfield 3 just not in the attacking positions. I actually think that might be his best position now, I don't think he's got the legs to play wide left anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone expecting a change in style or tactical set up are dreamers . Pulis is not suddenly going to change his philosophies ,maybe a small tweak in the centre of the park but thats about it . 

the best i can hope for is  dropping constant poor performers and  pedestrian players  but at present  all our forwards  are poor or off form  so its a bit depressing .

 

Well he did change to three in the middle for the first time for the last game. So we can hope that he magically changes for something that has goals included. But regardless of formation it's most likely going to be depressing anyway :crying:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at all the successful implementations of 4-3-3, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid and closer to our level in Fulham. The midfield 3 is made up of at least two play makers, anchored by more of a disciplined midfielder who is still a capable passer. I think the key to a midfield 3 is having that threat, a midfield 3 of Besic, Leadbitter and Howson doesn't scream "danger!" to me...

 

I'd be happy to play 4-3-3 if the Midfield consisted more along the lines of Downing-Howson-Baker with Harrison, Assombalonga/Gestede and Adama infront. Especially with the Defensive back 4 we have we might actually start to threaten teams whilst staying relatively solid, alas I think this would be too proactive for a Pulis team...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the promotion push over for this season? (Obviously not mathematically but realistically)

I think so - our record against the top teams is dire so even making the playoffs won't help

 

What changes do we make for this?

I'd love us to play 4-4-2 with Britt and Bamford up top.

Traore and Harrison on the wings.

 

Besic and Harrison to start?

Yes for me, besic and howson in the middle.

 

Score prediction.

Easy 2-0, Hull are terrible, even more terrible than us!

 

#UTB

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at all the successful implementations of  4-3-3, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid and closer to our level in Fulham. The midfield 3 is made up of at least two play makers, anchored by more of a disciplined midfielder who is still a capable passer. I think the key to a midfield 3 is having that threat, a midfield 3 of Besic, Leadbitter and Howson doesn't scream "danger!" to me...

 

I'd be happy to play 4-3-3 if the Midfield consisted more along the lines of Downing-Howson-Baker with Harrison, Assombalonga/Gestede and Adama infront. Especially with the Defensive back 4 we have we might actually start to threaten teams whilst staying relatively solid, alas I think this would be too proactive for a Pulis team...

 

I can see the midfield three working with

 

Howson - Clayton - Downing

 

With Clayton holding and the other two with licence to be more adventurous.  

 

Won't happen though, as he likes midfield destroyers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at all the successful implementations of  4-3-3, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid and closer to our level in Fulham. The midfield 3 is made up of at least two play makers, anchored by more of a disciplined midfielder who is still a capable passer. I think the key to a midfield 3 is having that threat, a midfield 3 of Besic, Leadbitter and Howson doesn't scream "danger!" to me...

 

I'd be happy to play 4-3-3 if the Midfield consisted more along the lines of Downing-Howson-Baker with Harrison, Assombalonga/Gestede and Adama infront. Especially with the Defensive back 4 we have we might actually start to threaten teams whilst staying relatively solid, alas I think this would be too proactive for a Pulis team...

 

I can see the midfield three working with

 

Howson - Clayton - Downing

 

With Clayton holding and the other two with licence to be more adventurous.  

 

Won't happen though, as he likes midfield destroyers.

 

I don't think this is too far from what's happening at the moment, when Downing is playing through the centre he plays quite deep and it feels like more of a midfield 3 than a midfield 2. Going forward I think Besic and Howson will be the pairing, Besic seems to be able to spray long passes and make runs from deep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Latest Posts

    • He was probably our top target because he was free and experienced at this level. It's disconcerting when we need three in and we've missed out on a free transfer. Going to be a long summer.
    • Well football is cyclical. They were at the top of theirs back then...as were we. I guess we can count ourselves lucky we didn't bottom out as low as they did.     In one sense they were horrible days. With hindsight we were clearly spending beyond our means...even with Sky's millions. Not saying Southgate would have kept us up without the budget cutting but he'd have had a better chance. We didn't plan long-term to make sure we could sustain our place in the PL...or mount a strong comeback once we got relegated. Just been a series of kneejerk reactions and short-term thinking. On the flip side it was fun while it lasted. I would love to know though if Gibson & the board actually thought the gravy train would ride on indefinitely, or if they were actually aware of the precarious state the club would be in, if the money stopped rolling in...   Ah yes, the days when we were Middlesburgh Celtic. 😁  
    • This is scarily familiar, right down to the team signing our top option!
    • If he was our top target and he has chosen to go play second fiddle to last seasons ‘obviously not top target’ that’s disconcerting.
    • That is the only thing that would surprise me. The scale of the rebuild needed is huge. I don’t see us getting quality and quantity.

×
×
  • Create New...