Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
BearSmog

Boro v Sunderland (A) 3-3 (Bamford (2) Leadbitter)

Recommended Posts

It's not as bad as under Strachan. The quality of player is much higher with bad tactics.. Whereas Strachan was bad players with bad tactics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not as bad as under Strachan. The quality of player is much higher with bad tactics.. Whereas Strachan was bad players with bad tactics.

 

So then, does that actually make it better or worse, if you see what I mean?

 

Under Strachan we had no real reason to be good whereas now it can be argued that we do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not as bad as under Strachan. The quality of player is much higher with bad tactics.. Whereas Strachan was bad players with bad tactics.

 

So then, does that actually make it better or worse, if you see what I mean?

 

Under Strachan we had no real reason to be good whereas now it can be argued that we do.

 

The Strachan days did start off with high expectations too... perhaps hard to remember it now, but in the beginning there was a real buzz and genuine expectation that he was building a team with an identity that would challenge for promotion. Signing all these Celtic & Rangers players who had scored a combined 3,528 goals in the SPL and had played in the Champions League etc... then we realised half of them were crap while the rest couldn't be bothered, and it was all downhill from there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now. The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period. I'm not sure you can say that now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now.  The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period.  I'm not sure you can say that now.

 

Probably not but now we sign players who only last less then half a season or get nowhere near the match day squad.

 

What a strange recruitment policy we seem to have :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now.  The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period.  I'm not sure you can say that now.

 

The cost cutting period started after Strachan with Mowbray though.

 

And ofc the aim with this season was not to end 8th, but it still doesent mean we are garbage as most of you seem to think.

 

Maybe som of the players we have now also his not as good as we think, just with the players that we bought under Strachan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cost cutting period started after Strachan with Mowbray though.

 

Not really. When we went down, we signed Leroy Lita and Danny Coyne on a free, Mark Yeates for about £500k despite selling Downing for £12m early in the window, followed by another £17m from Huth, Tuncay and Alves later on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now.  The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period.  I'm not sure you can say that now.

 

The cost cutting period started after Strachan with Mowbray though.

 

And ofc the aim with this season was not to end 8th, but it still doesent mean we are garbage as most of you seem to think.

 

Maybe som of the players we have now also his not as good as we think, just with the players that we bought under Strachan?

 

Where was this positivity when Monk was here ;)

In all seriousness though we obviously aren’t garbage but it’s still thoroughly disappointing we are where we are considering our outlay on players and high expectations before the season. Hurts even more that the likes of Cardiff, Bristol are doing better than us despite (on paper) having inferior squads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now.  The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period.  I'm not sure you can say that now.

 

The cost cutting period started after Strachan with Mowbray though.

 

And ofc the aim with this season was not to end 8th, but it still doesent mean we are garbage as most of you seem to think.

 

Maybe som of the players we have now also his not as good as we think, just with the players that we bought under Strachan?

 

The cost cutting started before Strachan while we had Southgate as manager.  It continued on through Strachan and Mowbray until Karanka.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cost cutting started after Eindhoven, I think Gibson knew that model was unsustainable.

 

We still spent big on transfers from time to time but the cloth cutting started back then especially with the wage bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They started off with high expectations because we'd just been relegated, you could say the same for us now.  The difference is that didn't have a particularly good squad back then and signed some awful players on top of that unfortunately but we were in a cost cutting period.  I'm not sure you can say that now.

 

The cost cutting period started after Strachan with Mowbray though.

 

And ofc the aim with this season was not to end 8th, but it still doesent mean we are garbage as most of you seem to think.

 

Maybe som of the players we have now also his not as good as we think, just with the players that we bought under Strachan?

 

Where was this positivity when Monk was here ;)

In all seriousness though we obviously aren’t garbage but it’s still thoroughly disappointing we are where we are considering our outlay on players and high expectations before the season. Hurts even more that the likes of Cardiff, Bristol are doing better than us despite (on paper) having inferior squads.

 

I was positive at start with Monk, and I realy thought that he got the away games right, think it was a bad time for the sacking, but if its true that he flirted with Swansea then I can understand it better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd think we'd see this:

 

-------------------- Randolph ------------------

-- Shotton --- Ayala -- Gibson --- Friend --

------------- Besic -------- Howson ------------ 

-- Traore ------- Downing ------ Bamford --

-------------------- Gestede ---------------------

 

But Tony might stroke his chin and go "hmmm it's a local deerrrrrby so I better make sure we really strangle the game" with leggy Leadboots in the team:

 

-------------------- Randolph ------------------

-- Shotton --- Ayala -- Gibson --- Friend --

------------- Besic -------- Leadbitter --------- 

-- Traore ------- Downing ------ Bamford --

-------------------- Gestede ---------------------

 

Whereas if it were up to me, I'd say "right, the mackems are absolute pants, let's go there and torture them 4-0":

 

-------------------- Randolph ------------------

-- Shotton --- Ayala -- Gibson --- Friend --

---------------------- Besic ------------------------ 

-- Traore ------- Downing ------ Harrison --

------------ Gestede --- Bamford -------------

 

Whatever team he puts out, I'm predicting goals from the entire backline from set pieces and we win 4-0.

 

UTB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Downing is starting to look a bit fatigued I'd like to see Baker given an opportunity, even if it's just off the bench. A midfield 3 of Besic, Howson and Baker would be a far cry from the trio of Forshaw, Clayton and De Roon of last year...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What has gone so horribly wrong for the Mackems? I don't care.

Do we care? No.

Any changes? Yes.

Or stick with the winning formula? Sort of. Not many changes.

Formation? See below.

 

------------------Randolph.

Shotton - Ayala - Fry/Gibson - Friend

---------------Howson - Besic

Traore ----- Bamford - Downing/Harrison

----------------Gestede

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really looking forward to this game. Doesn't matter that we're not playing great. Fact of the matter is that if we beat a woeful Sunderland we're right in the mix for the top 6. In fact, we're already right in the mix.

 

Personally would opt for Bamford up front in this one. He's not a winger. And as much as I understand Gestede really suits TPs setup, in a game we SHOULD dominate Bamford might better fit the mould. That said, lots of arguments against dropping the striker that just scored 2 in the previous game, so I wouldn't bemoan a carbon copy of the last lineup.

 

Would be interesting to see Harrison get a run out; lack of alternatives there and otherwise why did we bother bringing him in in the first place - would like to think he's a bit sharper now after several weeks training.

 

Maybe...

Randolph, Shotton, Ayala, Gibson, Friend, Howson, Besic, Traore, Downing, Harrison, Bamford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like he really, genuinely is at a loss, rather than just being stubborn. Seems like he's saying what he'd like to do, versus what he's actually able to do with the squad he has, then getting confused between the two. He's having to play high stakes poker with a pretty average hand (while also being a novice player) and no matter what he tries, he keeps getting taken to the cleaners. Also, experienced isn't necessarily the same as good. Unless, as rumours suggest, he has lost the dressing room and they just aren't trying anymore. Feeling the tiniest twinge of sympathy for him, but really this is 90% on him (at this stage - 100% on Gibson for hiring him in the first place). If he had any decency he'd have handed in his resignation weeks ago and forced Gibson to find someone who actually knows how to manage.   Quite honestly, at this stage, I think its irrelevant what team he puts out. The youngsters will maybe lack the experience to deal with what Leeds throw at us and the senior players won't put in the effort. Either way, the end result will be the same. (Now I've said this, watch us scrape a flukey draw)  
    • These are just stats.  I don't claim the give they answers to everything or even anything.  It's just information that can be used to look at things.  It's entirely possible that Coulson and Spence both just happened to be in the side when it became better defensively and started gaining more points.  So it would be no more than a coincidence and over time the stats would revert to the teams average.  But it's also possible that them being in the side made us better and that this is reflected in the stats above.   In the past I've spoken about the mind playing tricks on people because of received/conventional wisdom.  So in this example, received wisdom would be that younger, inexperienced players make you weaker defensively because they make more mistakes.  I'm sure most would say that's fair enough, at least to some extent.  And because this thought is already in people's minds then that's what they 'see' or 'look' for in games and therefore it becomes true and reinforces the received wisdom.  I do wonder if that could be the case here?  Our worst defensive efforts this season came in games where neither of the youngsters played (Sheff Wed at home, Leeds away, that shambles of a game at Birmingham come to mind) and yet I read on here (and now from Woodgate) that they are to blame for us conceding goals with the reason that's often give that it's because teams are attacking those areas.  They've been attacking those areas all season long and every other area.  But that's not the problem anyway.  Because our defensive record this season is the 12th best in the league.  The issue is that our goal scoring record is the joint worst in the league and that's why we are in trouble.
    • You'd have to assume he's blaming Coulson and Spence, since those are the two he dropped after Luton.  Fry is injured rather than dropped and Tavernier hasn't started the last couple, although he started the two before that against Brentford and Blackburn.  As Spence didn't make his debut until the beginning of December, it would be harsh to blame him for our ills, unless Woodgate thinks we were doing ok beforehand! Here's a few stats to consider (league games only): Spence has started 11 games.  We've conceded 8 goals in those games at an average of 0.73 per game Spence hasn't started 23 games.  We've conceded 36 goals in those games at an average of 1.57 per game. Coulson has started 15 games.  We've conceded 18 goals in those games at an average of 1.2 per game. Coulson hasn't started 19 games.  We've conceded 26 goals in those games at an average of 1.37 per game. Spence and Coulson have started 8 games together.  We've conceded 6 goals in those games at an average of 0.75 per game. Spence and Coulson haven't started 26 games together.  We've conceded 38 goals in those games at an average of 1.46 per game.   In the games Spence has started we've gained 19 points at an average of 1.73 per game.  The games he hasn't started we've gained 18 points at an average of 0.78 per game.   In the games Coulson has started we've gained 20 points at an average of 1.33 per game.  The games he hasn't started we've gained 17 points at an average of 0.9 per game. The games they've started together we've gained 14 points at an average of 1.75 per game.  The games they haven't started together we've gained 23 points at an average of 0.89.  
    • I’ve got us surviving but that’s with a couple of wins that could most definitely be losses. Too hard To predict though - form for a lot of teams is crazy this season. The bottom 3 are having a mini revival but could easily return to pre Feb results. 
    • Perhaps I was wrong but I just interpreted it as it would be a freak result for us to beat them. Your explanation makes sense.
×
×
  • Create New...