Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Boro v Sunderland (A) 3-3 (Bamford (2) Leadbitter)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 664
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pessimism has won the day. Get in I'm buzzing for Adama was never a red.

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pessimism has won the day. Get in I'm buzzing for Adama was never a red.

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

 

yes your right adama's one handed shove to the chest was deffo akin to bruce lee's one inch punch totally excessive and brutal, could have killed him  :D :D :D :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pessimism has won the day. Get in I'm buzzing for Adama was never a red.

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

 

Unless they decided he didn't strike him in the head or face, and decided his arms to the chest didn't constitute "excessive force".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pessimism has won the day. Get in I'm buzzing for Adama was never a red.

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

 

Unless they decided he didn't strike him in the head or face, and decided his arms to the chest didn't constitute "excessive force".

 

I think that's what's happened. Looks pretty clearly like a push in the face to me. Hence his head whipping back. That doesn't happen if you get pushed in the chest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

 

Unless they decided he didn't strike him in the head or face, and decided his arms to the chest didn't constitute "excessive force".

 

I think that's what's happened. Looks pretty clearly like a push in the face to me. Hence his head whipping back. That doesn't happen if you get pushed in the chest.

 

Footballers whip there heads back when they receive a fair tackle so I wouldn’t put it against a footballer to make a meal of being pushed in the chest. Especially a bottom of the league club already down to ten men.

 

Christ, Rivaldo flung himself to the ground holding his face when the ball was kicked onto his shin at the World Cup years ago. Professional ootballers are the biggest pansies in sport. Dele Alli spends more time on the floor than on his feet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It was a red all day long.

 

Then why wasn't it upheld?

 

Because the panel haven't applied the rules of the games.

 

VIOLENT CONDUCT

 

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

 

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

 

Unless they decided he didn't strike him in the head or face, and decided his arms to the chest didn't constitute "excessive force".

 

I think that's what's happened. Looks pretty clearly like a push in the face to me. Hence his head whipping back. That doesn't happen if you get pushed in the chest.

 

Unless - and hold on to your head here Humpty cause this could blow your mind - unless he was faking it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a very impressive reaction time if so..

 

How much of a reaction time do you need mate? 

 

Especially if he poked him in the eye, as claimed, then he's almost certainly going in there thinking "if his hands come up anywhere near, down I go" and then you don't even need to think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Latest Posts

    • I was a fan of Warnock. Still am really, but have to admit the recent attitude when there was like 10 games left and all to play for was shocking. It's like he gave up way too early. You fight right to the end, not harp on about playing youth lads to give them a run out. Wound me up a bit that
    • I think it is partly this, but also partly seeing if they could if that makes sense. If the breakaway comes to fruition, great that suits them. If it doesn't, but they force UEFA into more changes that suit those clubs, great. In a horrible way it is a bit win/win for them, the only caveat to that is if all the governing bodies come together and punish them at this stage. Which might potentially drive them to can the idea completely or drive them to push it through anyway.
    • 🔴 "I can't see us beating anyone at the minute, we don't take any of our chances and keep making stupid mistakes. It's been terrible for the past four months."   The master motivator is at it again. Honestly if woodgate or karanka or pulis came out with half the stuff he does they'd be hounded out of the club by the entire fan base. It's incredible what he keeps getting away with. 
    • Sad thing is, if Perez and his buddies have their way, thats probably exactly what will happen. I can't imagine the actual football will improve beyond what we currently see, so in a desperate bid to attract more "future fans", they will likely go the American route and try to fill the match day with other events. Like when Liberty Media bought F1 and they decided to have concerts, funfairs and other stuff to "fill out" race weekends.  
    • I'm still not entirely convinced this isn't just an elaborate attempt to force uefa/fifa into more financial concessions for the big clubs. The ESL just seems so unworkable. They face legal challenges from all angles.

×
×
  • Create New...