Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
BearSmog

Boro v Sunderland (A) 3-3 (Bamford (2) Leadbitter)

Recommended Posts

 

As i said it's semantics. Every team cuts their cloth accordingly when they're relegated. We reduced spending after the largest outlay in our history....who'd have thought it? We continued spending under Southgate and Strachan. We stopped spending anything of note and started cutting our cloth accordingly under Mowbray. Mowbray balanced the books not Strachan or Southgate.

 

It's really not semantics.  You're talking about something that didn't happen and I'm talking about something that did.  Mowbray didn't balance the books any point.  Do you even know what that means?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Mr Slaven made the point that by not bringing in another forward should we have an injury we would be woefully short up front, and that has now come home to roost, lets hope we can keep Paddy and Britt fit for the rest of the season, poor again from us not replacing Braithwaite.

 

TBF, we did try to sign a striker and were very close to. Fulham nicked him off us. Maybe in the grand scheme of things there wasn't a great deal of chance of it happening with us, the only chance we had is if Fulham had wrapped up a deal earlier than finding out the Anderlecht deal had fallen through. But I doubt there will have been many available who we could bring in for negligible fees/loans.

You right we did, but we nearly always seem to put all our eggs in one basket, Cardiff managed to sign a striker Wolves brought Afobe in on loan, little bit  like the January transfer window 2017, same old same old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way Pulis will play two strikers when we only have two strikers available TO play.

 

Well that's a problem in itself now.  You'd assume we'll see an extra central midfielder unless Harrison comes in with Downing or maybe even Traore playing off the striker?  The alternative is playing Britt with Bamford off him maybe but as you say would he even do it.  Is Baker still here?  He was supposed to be a number 10 wasn't he?  It'd be odd to see him come out of nowhere to being a key player all of a sudden though.

 

Over on FMTTM people have mentioned Anichebe...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Front four now that Gestede is ruled out.

 

Traore - Downing - Harrison

————Bamford

 

Please TP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way Pulis will play two strikers when we only have two strikers available TO play.

 

Well that's a problem in itself now.  You'd assume we'll see an extra central midfielder unless Harrison comes in with Downing or maybe even Traore playing off the striker?  The alternative is playing Britt with Bamford off him maybe but as you say would he even do it.  Is Baker still here?  He was supposed to be a number 10 wasn't he?  It'd be odd to see him come out of nowhere to being a key player all of a sudden though.

 

Over on FMTTM people have mentioned Anichebe...

 

FMTTM also have a thread going about 'what are your favourite crisps'....

 

I don't see why there would be a central midfielder coming in, I reckon he'll do a straight swap for Britt and the team will look much the same. Pulis has actually started Britt in a few games in this system and always brings him on at some point... the guy is hardly frozen out. We just won't be able to hit it long as much or as effectively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to call it now, Bamford to finally get his chance up top and he'll fire us into the play-offs and on into the Premier League

 

-------------------- Randolph ------------------

-- Shotton --- Ayala -- Gibson --- Friend --

------------- Besic ---------- Howson ----------- 

-- Traore ------- Downing ------ Harrison --

-------------------- Bamford ----------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As i said it's semantics. Every team cuts their cloth accordingly when they're relegated. We reduced spending after the largest outlay in our history....who'd have thought it? We continued spending under Southgate and Strachan. We stopped spending anything of note and started cutting our cloth accordingly under Mowbray. Mowbray balanced the books not Strachan or Southgate.

 

It's really not semantics.  You're talking about something that didn't happen and I'm talking about something that did.  Mowbray didn't balance the books any point.  Do you even know what that means?

 

If you'd like to spend your friday afternoon explaining what "balancing the books" means to a stranger, please feel free to go ahead.

 

As an aside though, do you often take a literal meaning of blaise posts in an 'off the cuff' environment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be the team that starts

 

Randolph

 

Shotton

Friend

Ayala

Gibson

 

Leadbitter

Howson

Besic

 

Traore

Downing

 

Bamford

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kettle crisps cracked black pepper and sea salt.

 

Close..

 

Kettle Chips sweet chilli and sour cream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kettle crisps cracked black pepper and sea salt.

 

Close..

 

Kettle Chips sweet chilli and sour cream

 

I'm with Billy....sometimes partial to a massive bag of cheesy puffs as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kettle crisps cracked black pepper and sea salt.

 

Close..

 

Kettle Chips sweet chilli and sour cream

 

I'm with Billy....sometimes partial to a massive bag of cheesy puffs as well.

 

A classic combination, Humpty, a bag of each and you can’t go wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As i said it's semantics. Every team cuts their cloth accordingly when they're relegated. We reduced spending after the largest outlay in our history....who'd have thought it? We continued spending under Southgate and Strachan. We stopped spending anything of note and started cutting our cloth accordingly under Mowbray. Mowbray balanced the books not Strachan or Southgate.

 

It's really not semantics.  You're talking about something that didn't happen and I'm talking about something that did.  Mowbray didn't balance the books any point.  Do you even know what that means?

 

If you'd like to spend your friday afternoon explaining what "balancing the books" means to a stranger, please feel free to go ahead.

 

As an aside though, do you often take a literal meaning of blaise posts in an 'off the cuff' environment?

 

Why would I want to do that when you're clearly an expert on the subject?

 

Literal meaning or any other meaning, Mowbray didn't balance the books as I've explained previously and we only spent money we'd brought in under the other two managers.  Once we stopped bringing money in we stopped spending it until Gibson was ready to go again at which point our wage bill increased by a sizeable amount as did our transfer spending.  At no point before that time were we not making substantial losses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FMTTM also have a thread going about 'what are your favourite crisps'....

 

I don't see why there would be a central midfielder coming in, I reckon he'll do a straight swap for Britt and the team will look much the same. Pulis has actually started Britt in a few games in this system and always brings him on at some point... the guy is hardly frozen out. We just won't be able to hit it long as much or as effectively.

 

I'm not sure the favourite crisps thread is as relevant to our striker situation as a thread about a player Pulis has worked with before who is out of contract and plays the same position as a player we have just lost to injury for the rest of the season.

 

An extra central midfielder coming in was because he has seemed less than convinced about Britt and only last weekend we switched to three central midfielders albeit this was at Cardiff but it shows the idea is already in his head.  It's entirely possible that you're correct and Britt simply comes in to replace Gestede but I wouldn't say it was nailed on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting back to the game itself winning is massively important because if Hull can get a win or draw tonight we will get into the top 6 due to us having a better g/d than Bristol City who play Cardiff on Sunday at Cardiff's gaff.

 

I mentioned about Boro teasing the fans well that time has come so hopefully we will do what needs to be done, after all we still play both Sheffield United and Bristol City so from this point onwards our top 6 fate is in our own hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Latest Posts

    • Steve Gibson's primary concern is to have total control and likes to see the club as his vehicle to give his mates jobs, which vicariously gives him power. Gibson, akin to his Tory leaning ways, is obsessed with power and controls the media by keeping the Evening Gazette and BBC Tees toting the party lines. I don't blame the Evening Gazette sports team, it's just Gibson and the Club using their power to remove any meaningful scrutiny that the club have. The Club have got Neil Maddison on the payroll with his job within the club. Slaven got sacked in that role after becoming too outspoken. Gibson is doing everything in his power to avoid scrutiny. If he bothered to put the same robust practices that he puts into avoiding scrutiny, into organising the club into being successful on the pitch then we wouldn't be in this mess. There are many parallels between how the Club control the media and how the Tories get an easy ride from the right wing press. The only time when we've been successful in the past decade is when Karanka and Orta took control away from Gibson. Either side of Karanka being here we've wasted money on garbage signings and knee jerked between unsuccessful managers who were either unproven and unprepared to be a manager or dinosaur managers. I also don't like how when Karanka and Orta left Gibson got the Evening Gazette to launch a smear campaign on them. It was very dirty by Gibson. The way I think Gibson views the club is that as he puts loads of millions into MFC then he can do whatever he wants. The mantra is basically that the fans are meaningless and that Gibson is infallible like a medieval King or Pope. I think the Club would be by far better off if there was more scrutiny of decisions, both within itself about appointments to senior positions, such as could anyone have warned Gibson about appointing Woodgate and Bevington into such influential positions?, and externally through the media; There were eyebrows raised on here about both those appointments, yet the club saw no issue and the Evening Gazette and BBC Tees didn't scrutinise the decisions. It has just endlessly produced propaganda on behalf of Woodgate and the club. We're teetering on the brink of relegation to League One, and its abundantly clear that Gibson is completely mismanaging the club. We desperately need a Director of Football in the Summer to take away the power from Gibson's incompetent hands. Hopefully we can somehow salvage this season so that we're not walking out as a League One side in August. It's incredibly worrying times.
    • Yeah I probably agree with you there.  Wouldn’t be surprised if he went back to 5 at the back and had Coulson as wing back. That way we could still get his threat going forward. 
    • Breaking... We have a New manager!! 
×
×
  • Create New...