Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Tom

Boro v Aston Villa - Playoff Semi Final (Second Leg) 0-0 (0-1 agg)

Recommended Posts

Shotton to CD, Fabio RB. Then Paddy in for Britt. If/when we need a goal later in the game then bring on Britt instead of Clayton and go 442/4411.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think britt to start. He's the only player who got any real clear chances and that was because of his movement. He scuffed all three but on another day he could have been on for a hat trick. Would prefer him to start and bamford on at the 60mins mark for a midfielder if we need a goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think britt to start. He's the only player who got any real clear chances and that was because of his movement. He scuffed all three but on another day he could have been on for a hat trick. Would prefer him to start and bamford on at the 60mins mark for a midfielder if we need a goal.

 

Agreed that Britt’s movement was impressive on Saturday. There were a couple of times he’d made space for himself and if our player had got their head up they could’ve played him in (looking at you, Besic). But think I’d prefer Bamford because I think his movement can be better than Britt’s and I’m more confident in his ability as a finisher, I can’t see us making many chances so would rather have our best finisher up top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bamford's movement is far better than Britt's and I think we look a better team with him in it.

 

I'm pretty sure Bamford will be back tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been to most away games this year and Pat has struggled when asked to play upfront alone. The ball always comes-back and when the team is struggling he disappears. Though, at home it's a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a tough one as I think bamford would have buried one of those 3 chances Britt had in the first half, at least. But Britt did well to get into those positions to begin with

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been to most away games this year and Pat has struggled when asked to play upfront alone. The ball always comes-back and when the team is struggling he disappears. Though, at home it's a different story.

 

I've been to a fair few myself and all the home games, there isn't many games this season I haven't watched either live or on a laptop.

 

I think if we are comparing the two strikers, they're both pretty average at holding the ball up and both of them struggle without having a proper number 10 and/or support from midfield.

 

I think Bamford actually holds the ball up better because his touch is better than Britt's.

 

Both are decent finishers but I think Bamford just brings a lot more to the team with his movement off the ball and work rate.

 

All round I just think Bamford is better in virtually every department.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Bamford will be back tomorrow.

 

Based on what? He got subbed on and didn't improve us. Not his fault by any means but I don't really see what there is to say Bamford will be back in the team over Britt based on anything other than his goal at Ipswich. And that surely would have meant he'd have been in at the weekend too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Bamford will be back tomorrow.

 

Based on what? He got subbed on and didn't improve us. Not his fault by any means but I don't really see what there is to say Bamford will be back in the team over Britt based on anything other than his goal at Ipswich. And that surely would have meant he'd have been in at the weekend too.

 

Im not suggesting Bamford played well on Saturday, I think his performance in the first leg is pretty irrelevant in deciding who starts tomorrow for the reasons you've already stated.

 

I think Britt started for one reason on Saturday, I think Pulis wanted to keep faith with the team that was on an unbeaten run. He was loyal to Britt and everyone else had had been playing pretty well.

 

That's out the window now and the strongest team will be picked for Tuesday. In my opinion Bamford is just a better player and contributes more to the team. It's a pretty simple reason really, maybe I'll be wrong we'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Britt does work hard and makes good runs but often snatches at his shots, which is fine if we're playing a poor team and are going to create a ton of chances because eventually he'll stick one in.

 

Cannot see us peppering Villa's goal with shots though whatever happens. Like last time we might get one or two good chances to score in the whole game.. and I know I would much rather those chances fell to Bamford, he is a better finisher and way more composed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Bamford will be back tomorrow.

 

Based on what? He got subbed on and didn't improve us. Not his fault by any means but I don't really see what there is to say Bamford will be back in the team over Britt based on anything other than his goal at Ipswich. And that surely would have meant he'd have been in at the weekend too.

 

Im not suggesting Bamford played well on Saturday, I think his performance in the first leg is pretty irrelevant in deciding who starts tomorrow for the reasons you've already stated.

 

I think Britt started for one reason on Saturday, I think Pulis wanted to keep faith with the team that was on an unbeaten run. He was loyal to Britt and everyone else had had been playing pretty well.

 

That's out the window now and the strongest team will be picked for Tuesday. In my opinion Bamford is just a better player and contributes more to the team. It's a pretty simple reason really, maybe I'll be wrong we'll see.

 

I'm not doubting whether Bamford is a better player, mate, I agree with you on that. But you didn't just say you'd pick him, you think Pulis will. He's has hardly made a reputation so far of making big changes unless it's 100% forced. And I think Britt started because he's been good and scoring recently not because of keeping the same 11 that's been unbeaten.

 

I've no doubt in my mind Pulis will pick the team he thinks is strongest. I also don't think he'd put anything less on the pitch because of faith in an unbeaten team, certainly not in a play-off game and certainly not after a performance like we put on at Ipswich which was rank average to say the least.

 

After that game, I'd have been thinking changes were needed if better players could come in and I think if he was genuinely concerned about the difference in quality between Bamford and Britt, he would have picked Bamford for the first game. He didn't, not even after his goal against Ipswich. And neither Britt nor Bamford have done anything in the first leg to significantly affect their chances of who starts tomorrow so if I was to predict who Pulis would pick, it would be Britt. I could of course be wrong too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Bamford will be back tomorrow.

 

Based on what? He got subbed on and didn't improve us. Not his fault by any means but I don't really see what there is to say Bamford will be back in the team over Britt based on anything other than his goal at Ipswich. And that surely would have meant he'd have been in at the weekend too.

 

Im not suggesting Bamford played well on Saturday, I think his performance in the first leg is pretty irrelevant in deciding who starts tomorrow for the reasons you've already stated.

 

I think Britt started for one reason on Saturday, I think Pulis wanted to keep faith with the team that was on an unbeaten run. He was loyal to Britt and everyone else had had been playing pretty well.

 

That's out the window now and the strongest team will be picked for Tuesday. In my opinion Bamford is just a better player and contributes more to the team. It's a pretty simple reason really, maybe I'll be wrong we'll see.

 

I'm not doubting whether Bamford is a better player, mate, I agree with you on that. But you didn't just say you'd pick him, you think Pulis will. He's has hardly made a reputation so far of making big changes unless it's 100% forced. And I think Britt started because he's been good and scoring recently not because of keeping the same 11 that's been unbeaten.

 

I've no doubt in my mind Pulis will pick the team he thinks is strongest. I also don't think he'd put anything less on the pitch because of faith in an unbeaten team, certainly not in a play-off game and certainly not after a performance like we put on at Ipswich which was rank average to say the least.

 

After that game, I'd have been thinking changes were needed if better players could come in and I think if he was genuinely concerned about the difference in quality between Bamford and Britt, he would have picked Bamford for the first game. He didn't, not even after his goal against Ipswich. And neither Britt nor Bamford have done anything in the first leg to significantly affect their chances of who starts tomorrow so if I was to predict who Pulis would pick, it would be Britt. I could of course be wrong too.

 

I dont think we're really disagreeing on anything. We're both just second guessing Pulis I suppose, my theory is that Britt had 75 minutes to impress on Saturday and he didn't really do that. He also missed a couple of half chances.

 

Bamford didn't really get the same chance to impress so I think Pulis will just try something different without really changing the dynamic of the team.

 

I'm totally second guessing Pulis here and I might be talking rubbish but I think he rates Bamford ahead of Britt as well. I just think he picked Britt because he hadn't really done anything wrong and wanted to show a bit of loyalty to the players that had got us to the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will see howson replaced by Bamford and go out wide on the left with Downing drop more centrally and just ahead of Besic and Clayton.

Thought Clayton was once again fantastic so I can't see why people suggest dropping him for the useless Leadboots.

Move Shotton into CB if Ayala is injured so we still have him for his throw ins etc and put Fabio at right back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will see howson replaced by Bamford and go out wide on the left with Downing drop more centrally and just ahead of Besic and Clayton.

Thought Clayton was once again fantastic so I can't see why people suggest dropping him for the useless Leadboots.

Move Shotton into CB if Ayala is injured so we still have him for his throw ins etc and put Fabio at right back.

 

Yeah I'd agree with most of that, I thought Clayton was probably our best player on Saturday but some people obviously see different things when they watch him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think we’ll be unchanged, except for Fabio for Ayala. We didn’t really do a massive amount wrong, and apart from Shotton I don’t think anyone really had a shocker.

I’d be happy with either Bamford or Britt starting tomoz, but think he’ll choose Britt again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Latest Posts

    • If we can afford Hughton we can afford Karanka. I don't care about the dangers of nostalgia, just give me that beautiful man back. 
    • Bola and Dijksteel are very raw but certainly have potential. Sorry for repeating this point for about the third time on here, but them two would massively benefit from a top quality coach who will drill them defensively - someone akin to Karanka. If the plan is to buying young talent and improve them, like we are led to believe, with good coaching and game time then having Woodgate as our manager completely undermines it.
    • 2-0 to us. Bounce back from the Leeds result (I hope).
    • Either way he was cack. Relegation season if I remember right (09)?
    • Sorry to leave you waiting, work has been a bit hectic. I've broken your points into 3 areas.  1. The point I'm trying (and failing) to make is that from Woodgate's original press conference it seems he has a preferred style that he would like to play. This style is his ultimate end goal, how he would like us to play. This is obviously not going to happen overnight, hence why we have spent the pre-season and first few games playing "his style". It is my opinon that this is laying the foundations for us to play this way. At the present moment in time I do not feel the squad can competently play this style and as such we have reverted back to a style that the players have a familiarity with, that they can play. When Jokanovic took over Fulham, I'd argue that the free flowing style they went up with was certainly not how they started playing under Jokanovic in his first 6 months in charge. But I'd almost guarantee that he was training the group of players he had certain elements of his preferred style.  2. I'm one of the first to acknowledge that we weren't going to be signing 10 players due to our financial constraints. But to answer your question I do feel that if we had got another couple of wide players in, we may have seen Woodgate persist with "his style". I do also feel however that to get to this end point in style it would take more than just the summer window and the upcoming window. By saying this about signings I'm not admitting that we would be a swash buckling side that would sweep all before them, but it would be seen as another piece of the puzzle to help us towards Woodgate's style. Again adding to the foundations that are slowly been knitted together, like the fact we played a certain way during pre-season and the first couple of games.  Basically what I'm trying to get across is that I feel we are aiming for a certain style of play and that we are adding bit by bit certain elements of this style. Whether it is the pressing element, like we saw in the Luton, Brentford, Hull and Bristol City games (in my opinion), interestingly we played a 4-3-3 in 3/4 of those games. Or whether it is by the need of having more squad depth to allow us to try and play a 4-3-3 on a more frequent basis. 3. I've kind of half answered this in the bit above. It is of my opinion that we would see a 4-3-3 a lot more often this season if we had signed another winger (or 2) in the summer. The fact that we didn't for me is a key reason in us playing a back 5 often. I also feel a big problem is our total lack of creativity in the team. I also do not feel that we are a player or 2 away from implementing Woodgate's system. Jokanovic signed 11 permanent players in his first full season at Fulham, I don't think we need quite as many but certainly there are key positions we need filling. A striker who will press, wingers/inside forwards, a play maker in the middle, a defensive midfielder and for me a centre half that is comfortable with the ball at their feet.
×
×
  • Create New...