wilsoncgp 9,230 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Bloody hell, another peach of a strike by Reach. Too much ball watching though. Link to post Share on other sites
Neverbefore 10,699 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 God I wish reach still played for us As much as a die hard karanka fan as I am... god damn you for selling him ak!! Link to post Share on other sites
Andyboro 73 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 all comes from ayala mashing slide tackle all game from behind... Link to post Share on other sites
unclesmog 53 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Reach is just playing goal of the month/season by himself I think Link to post Share on other sites
Downsouth 6,176 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Hugill if you are going to offer anything then today is the day Link to post Share on other sites
unclesmog 53 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 I think Friend must have a head shaped like a 20p piece. Every single header goes in a random direction even Ian Malcolm couldn't predict. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Downsouth 6,176 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 The most nervous 5 mins to come damn we need a break away goal get into their half Link to post Share on other sites
Nics 8 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Sky saying Ayala should have had a red for an elbow on Fletcher Can they look at that again retrospectively? If the ref missed it then yes it will depend on his match report I'm pretty sure he'll struggle to get retrospective action for it. The ref didn't miss the call, he still called it a foul and judged it to be no booking. Not entirely 100% with the laws of the game on this but I think retrospective action is only for things the referee didn't see or make a decision on at all. "Firstly, it’s important to state that the principal objective behind retrospective action is to punish players who have clearly committed a red card offence ‘off the ball’. It is not designed to ‘re-referee’ tackles but can be applied if an act of violent conduct or serious foul play occurred secondary to the challenge or if the match officials’ view of the specific misconduct was unclear. In order for The FA to take retrospective action it must first establish from the match officials whether the incident was ‘not seen’. If they confirm they did see it then in almost all cases no further action is taken" https://help.thefa.com/support/solutions/articles/7000039299-how-does-the-fa-decide-whether-to-retrospectively-charge-a-player-for-an-incident-not-seen-by-the-m For me, it boils down to whether the ref saw the elbow or not. If he called the foul for pushing or whatever, then retroactive action could be taken for the elbow as it may be interpreted as secondary to the challenge. But I doubt anything will come from this anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
unclesmog 53 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 LMAO did you see Clayts there, he thought he was in a scrum Link to post Share on other sites
Andyboro 73 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 haha all pile on :) Link to post Share on other sites
ballyclover 210 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Utb...get in Link to post Share on other sites
northern boro 447 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Full time Boro win 2-1 Link to post Share on other sites
Nics 8 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Uh, looked like rugby in the end there. Link to post Share on other sites
Foogle 2,078 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Hearts in mouths stuff there, great goal from Reach, glad it was just a consolation! Link to post Share on other sites
wilsoncgp 9,230 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Look at Clayton there, pushing the players back over the line to make sure the ball doesn't cross. Incredible, haha. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts