RonBoro 44 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Wait what, what the actual living *** was that whole thing then?! Wing wins the ball, breaks away, gets the free kick given for him for some reason, then what, gets booked for dissent? Yeah sitting here thinking the same thing....Guess the Refs taken a liking to us. Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Pulis can see what we can that Besic isn't great today, he comes off early for Howson. Link to post Share on other sites
SmogDane 4,052 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Shotton booked for not giving the ball back at a free kick. Link to post Share on other sites
Tom 2,492 Posted February 2, 2019 Author Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? I didn't want to quote it, but it's fairly obvious which one. Link to post Share on other sites
thomas 501 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Get up Hugill Link to post Share on other sites
MMC 987 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? I didn't want to quote it, but it's fairly obvious which one. Pornhub? Link to post Share on other sites
Duvel 2,446 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Pulis Link to post Share on other sites
Changing Times 12,212 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Somebody was having an unnecessary dig at Brunners, which is weird as there's all kinds of valid reasons to give him pelters :) Link to post Share on other sites
Tom 2,492 Posted February 2, 2019 Author Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? I didn't want to quote it, but it's fairly obvious which one. Pornhub? OneBoro mate, but I can see why you'd get confused. Link to post Share on other sites
AdamBoro 5 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Here for anyone that hasn't seen it Looks like a dive to me Actually look at the movement of the West Brom player before Hugill goes down, he jolts, as if there's been contact between the two. You’re they type of retard who defends that cheating. He garbage and needs to cheat. Go back to west ham, donkey. Thanks for the insult. I'm not defending anything, I haven't said one way or the other whether I think it was a foul, I'm merely saying that replay actually suggests there may have been some contact of some description. Enough to make him go down? Probably not, watching it, but I'm just saying what I can see. Thanks for clarification, still think you’re a retard though, sorry but that movement of the west brom player was 10 minutes before he dove. Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Somebody was having an unnecessary dig at Brunners, which is weird as there's all kinds of valid reasons to give him pelters :) Appreciate the support CT Link to post Share on other sites
RonBoro 44 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Who = Tony Pulis, and what word? = $*** Football :P Link to post Share on other sites
Changing Times 12,212 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Please don't use that word on here. You won't get another warning. Who, Tom and what word? Somebody was having an unnecessary dig at Brunners, which is weird as there's all kinds of valid reasons to give him pelters :) Appreciate the support CT :heart: Link to post Share on other sites
Brunners 7,952 Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Here for anyone that hasn't seen it Looks like a dive to me Actually look at the movement of the West Brom player before Hugill goes down, he jolts, as if there's been contact between the two. You’re they type of retard who defends that cheating. He garbage and needs to cheat. Go back to west ham, donkey. Thanks for the insult. I'm not defending anything, I haven't said one way or the other whether I think it was a foul, I'm merely saying that replay actually suggests there may have been some contact of some description. Enough to make him go down? Probably not, watching it, but I'm just saying what I can see. Thanks for clarification, still think you’re a retard though, sorry but that movement of the west brom player was 10 minutes before he dove. Lol someones gonna get in trouble now. For the record, when you're going full speed it can look like ages between contact and a fall. I think it is probably a dive, what I think has happened is they've collided arms or maybe a tiny heel clip in incidental contact and Hugill has just instinctively gone down. I don't condone it, but I don't think he's dived completely sans contact. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts