Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Investment Rumours. Reality or Red Bull S***?


Recommended Posts

On fmttm recently

 

One poster said he seen bausor and Bevington on a flight to schipol.

 

Followed by a couple of days later a regular poster saying bausor is away working on something pretty big, turns out he was in France.

 

Followed by today someone saying his mate heard something about the PSG owners buying a championship club and apparently it’s us and we’ve had ‘representatives’ over in Paris.

 

Nothing reliable at all but interesting how it’s all fitted together from different people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On fmttm recently

 

One poster said he seen bausor and Bevington on a flight to schipol.

 

Followed by a couple of days later a regular poster saying bausor is away working on something pretty big, turns out he was in France.

 

Followed by today someone saying his mate heard something about the PSG owners buying a championship club and apparently it’s us and we’ve had ‘representatives’ over in Paris.

 

Nothing reliable at all but interesting how it’s all fitted together from different people.

 

I wonder how Neymar would fit into a Pulis system:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some change for the better would suit me. I watched the villa and Leeds game yesterday and man the villa ground was bouncing, loads of investment in getting an atmosphere, they look classy at the moment. No mega stand out players besides a few, same with the Leeds game. No household name bit man did they play some good football. I just hope we change, how i don't know but just change so it's better ha ha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On fmttm recently

 

One poster said he seen bausor and Bevington on a flight to schipol.

 

Followed by a couple of days later a regular poster saying bausor is away working on something pretty big, turns out he was in France.

 

Followed by today someone saying his mate heard something about the PSG owners buying a championship club and apparently it’s us and we’ve had ‘representatives’ over in Paris.

 

Nothing reliable at all but interesting how it’s all fitted together from different people.

 

I wonder how Neymar would fit into a Pulis system:)

 

He'd be a cracking full back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t know if it’s been mentioned before on here, but:-

The Gibson O’Neill Company Ltd. is the company SG has that controls his interests. It owns three main companies - Bulkhaul Ltd.the trading company that makes his money, Rockliffe Hall ltd. (that owns Rockliffe) and Middlesbrough Football and Athletic (1986) Ltd.

Until last year the shares in Gibson o’Neill were owned 75% by SG and 25% by David O’Neill.

 Last August, they did a complete share reorganisation. It used to be the case all the shares were Ordinary shares, but after August they had Ordinary shares, A Ordinary, B Ordinary, C Ordinary and D Ordinary - 5 classes of shares each with different values and rights. They then created two new companies - called Crossco(1437) and Crossco (1438) to which the B and D shares were transferred. (SG owns one company and DON the other). 

You don’t do all that work and pay lawyers unless you have a reason. Often, it means you want to sell part of the company and dividing the shares up into different classes can be part of the process. Of course it could just be that O’Neill wants out or SG wants to make it easier to pass some of the company to his daughter, but if you want you can use it to add to the speculation about new investment.

 

Separately, The Sunday Times Rich List came out today. it has SG as being worth £210m, up by £15m from last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Michael O'Neill.  The voting rights are still the same, 75%/25% and the Crossco companies don't have shares with voting rights.

 

Yes, your right. It is Michael O’Neill, not David. Apologies.  And yes voting rights are same - but I never said they had changed. That’s not the point. The point is you don’t go to that trouble for no reason, and preparing part of company (I.e. the football club ownership) for sale would be one logical reason

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Michael O'Neill.  The voting rights are still the same, 75%/25% and the Crossco companies don't have shares with voting rights.

 

Yes, your right. It is Michael O’Neill, not David. Apologies.  And yes voting rights are same - but I never said they had changed. That’s not the point. The point is you don’t go to that trouble for no reason, and preparing part of company (I.e. the football club ownership) for sale would be one logical reason

 

It's not really trouble.  It's just some paperwork and that.  Selling MFC wouldn't be the only logical reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Michael O'Neill.  The voting rights are still the same, 75%/25% and the Crossco companies don't have shares with voting rights.

 

Yes, your right. It is Michael O’Neill, not David. Apologies.  And yes voting rights are same - but I never said they had changed. That’s not the point. The point is you don’t go to that trouble for no reason, and preparing part of company (I.e. the football club ownership) for sale would be one logical reason

 

It's not really trouble.  It's just some paperwork and that.  Selling MFC wouldn't be the only logical reason.

 

Selling bulkhaul and going all in on MFC?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Selling bulkhaul and going all in on MFC?!?

 

Not unless he's certifiable :)

 

Maybe after the sterling work that Pulis has done 'balancing the books' with MFC they've decided to hand over the rest of the business to him.  Imagine all of the cost cutting miracles he could work within Gibson O'Neill and by God those trucks wouldn't break down as much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On fmttm recently

 

One poster said he seen bausor and Bevington on a flight to schipol.

 

Followed by a couple of days later a regular poster saying bausor is away working on something pretty big, turns out he was in France.

 

Followed by today someone saying his mate heard something about the PSG owners buying a championship club and apparently it’s us and we’ve had ‘representatives’ over in Paris.

 

Nothing reliable at all but interesting how it’s all fitted together from different people.

 

Towards the end of last season, I think it was Nixon that said the PSG folk were looking at the championship. 2 Clubs were mentioned.. 1 was Sheff Wed and the other I've forgot the name of, but it wasn't Boro.

 

They're going to want a club with a big catchment and opportunities for growth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Michael O'Neill.  The voting rights are still the same, 75%/25% and the Crossco companies don't have shares with voting rights.

 

Yes, your right. It is Michael O’Neill, not David. Apologies.  And yes voting rights are same - but I never said they had changed. That’s not the point. The point is you don’t go to that trouble for no reason, and preparing part of company (I.e. the football club ownership) for sale would be one logical reason

 

It's not really trouble.  It's just some paperwork and that.  Selling MFC wouldn't be the only logical reason.

I never said it was the only reason - in fact i gave two other possible reasons. Fact remains that however little trouble/paperwork you think it is, you don't wake up one morning and think"lets change the structure of the company". You only go to a professional adviser if you have a goal in mind. You tell them what you want to achieve and they tell you how to go about it. That's what will have happened here. i've seen this a number of times at work and creating new classes of shares are often about something being sold or transferred. Another reason is to restructure the group for tax reasons, which is a possible alternative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Michael O'Neill.  The voting rights are still the same, 75%/25% and the Crossco companies don't have shares with voting rights.

 

Yes, your right. It is Michael O’Neill, not David. Apologies.  And yes voting rights are same - but I never said they had changed. That’s not the point. The point is you don’t go to that trouble for no reason, and preparing part of company (I.e. the football club ownership) for sale would be one logical reason

 

It's not really trouble.  It's just some paperwork and that.  Selling MFC wouldn't be the only logical reason.

I never said it was the only reason - in fact i gave two other possible reasons. Fact remains that however little trouble/paperwork you think it is, you don't wake up one morning and think"lets change the structure of the company". You only go to a professional adviser if you have a goal in mind. You tell them what you want to achieve and they tell you how to go about it. That's what will have happened here. i've seen this a number of times at work and creating new classes of shares are often about something being sold or transferred. Another reason is to restructure the group for tax reasons, which is a possible alternative.

 

I'm pretty sure the goal in mind is to give them and their families as much money as possible one way or another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • That would be very typical Boro. Personally I can't even make any predictions - beyond just making stuff up off the top of my head. I need to see us play a few more times before I can start predicting with any kind of reasoning. For now I'm just gonna...  
    • “We could have done ten deals by now, but we’d have overpaid," he said blunty. "Some clubs do overpay, and then they have to deal with the consequences down the line. We could be sat here where there wouldn’t have to be questions about recruitment because it would have all been done." "But what would have been done would have been overpaying and putting ourselves in a poor financial position and gambling massively our long-term future for immediate gain. We could quite easily do that, break rules and then do this and do that to work your way around it. Dodge bullets here and cut corners there. "You can’t do it, or you shouldn’t do it. We could have easily done it and the manager would be sat here saying, ‘brilliant, I’m alright. I’ve got what I want’. But, as we know, what happens - the consequences and the knock-on effect of the big gamble - has to be picked up by an owner, and at this club the owner doesn’t want to do it that way. Alternatively, somebody else picks it up or deals with the slack down the line, and I don’t think that’s how a football club should be run."   “I’ve felt it before. People lose their jobs - people who have been working at the football club for 30-35 years. Local contractors don’t get paid and go out of business. People get shafted. The football club then loses points, slides, relegation… Bang! Bang! Bang! "I understand it. Supporters are happy at the time, and it’s maybe a slight criticism of how certain supporters sometimes think. They’re quite happy for everybody to spend and live in the moment." "I remember the Portsmouth situation where they lived in that moment of winning the FA Cup and being in the UEFA Cup and having about 15 guys on £100 grand a week, in a ground that holds about 14-15,000 fans. That’s 14-15,000 really passionate supporters. But all of a sudden a bomb goes off beneath it and all of a sudden they’re in League Two trying to get out of it.”   from the Gazette article on Wilders latest press conference.

×
×
  • Create New...