Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Denzel Zanzibar

Boro vs Crewe Alexandra (EFL Cup) 2-2 (Fletcher, Bola)Boro lose 4-2 on penalties

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Safety is paramount, of course. The club would be much more liable to abuse if they allowed things to go on and something bad happened. If they fear something will happen, then fair enough, they need to take action. I know the stewards and police will have their say on this.

But communication is dreadful though, if nothing else. They spend ages developing this relationship with these fans who do their utmost to create an amazing atmosphere at the stadium, put together displays and all sorts... and then being throw them under a bus at a moment's notice. It baffles the mind. Imagine the stadium without the Red Faction... Christ.

It just makes no sense to me as to why they originally agreed to let them be based in Block 69 and then changed their minds last minute. Surely they're not allowed to discriminate against people just because they have a season ticket in the South Stand either. I very much doubt they'd have caused any trouble. It's a shame because they seemed to have formed a decent relationship with the club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If, as some people seem to think, we will be trying to replace Britt in January before value starts to plummet, the sensible thing would be to try alternatives in Cup games, so would be surprised to see him tonight....if Friend and Fry fit enough, at least give 45 minutes otherwise probably fringe players and new signings.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand the logic in trying howson in the holding role, but he is one of our older players and gets through a hell of a lot of work in a game so hed be the first I'd rest tonight. I dont want us to run him into the ground like we did with leadbitter  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding to the Red Faction twist .. 

I read it as they are allowed to come in, but it is forbidden to stand up during the game .. And that Stewards will not tolerate standing up and not look the other way as in the south stand. 
This becomes clearer if you read all the comments on the above linked tweet.

The homegame v Swansea last season I was in the middle of the RF group and it was an amazing atmosphere... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SmogDane said:

Regarding to the Red Faction twist .. 

I read it as they are allowed to come in, but it is forbidden to stand up during the game .. And that Stewards will not tolerate standing up and not look the other way as in the south stand. 
This becomes clearer if you read all the comments on the above linked tweet.

The homegame v Swansea last season I was in the middle of the RF group and it was an amazing atmosphere... 

I don't think that's what the red faction are saying though is it? They're claiming they were flat out told they're not allowed in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brunners said:

I don't think that's what the red faction are saying though is it? They're claiming they were flat out told they're not allowed in.

Yeah, but as I read the comments .. Especially the one who copy pastes an email from the club .. That they are allowed in (69) but not has the same freedom as in the south stand. (No standing up) 

If the club discriminated and said that season card holders from the south stand were NOT allowed to buy tickets .. That would be kinda illegal I guess... Would the club really use that kind of fascism? 

SOmeone might have said .. They don't want us there (because of the stricter rules) .. and then the jungle drums made a feather into a chicken farm .. 

I cannot believe that some people are not allowed in the stadium because of their normal season card positioning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the answer from the club to a fan who bought a 69 ticket:

Dear XXX
Many apologies, I am working through my emails and I have all the information that is required. You will be able to gain access in Block 69, however you must remain seated throughout the game during play. Enjoy the match.
Yvonne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Gazette have released an article on the issue now.

As @SmogDane has said seems they are allowed in Block 69 for the game, but aren't allowed to do what they normally do: drums, flags and standing. Which I don't understand why that would be an issue, as stewards turn a blind eye to that normally so why would today be any different (stated in Gazette article)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/fan-group-red-faction-blast-16745678

Quote: 

Boro offered a lower tier alternative area but that has been rejected by Red Faction who instead suggested moving higher up.

“We offered to move towards the back of the stand but were told the club would be unable to complete a health and safety assessment in time,” said the Red Faction statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SmogDane said:

Yeah, but as I read the comments .. Especially the one who copy pastes an email from the club .. That they are allowed in (69) but not has the same freedom as in the south stand. (No standing up) 

If the club discriminated and said that season card holders from the south stand were NOT allowed to buy tickets .. That would be kinda illegal I guess... Would the club really use that kind of fascism? 

SOmeone might have said .. They don't want us there (because of the stricter rules) .. and then the jungle drums made a feather into a chicken farm .. 

I cannot believe that some people are not allowed in the stadium because of their normal season card positioning.

I read the comments too and they are letting south stand season tickets holders in block 69 but under strict instructions not to stand.

Don’t think the club trusts red faction not to stand and are probably right so want them in a lower block.

The club should of know this would be a problem and sorted it out week ago.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

The Gazette have released an article on the issue now.

As @SmogDane has said seems they are allowed in Block 69 for the game, but aren't allowed to do what they normally do: drums, flags and standing. Which I don't understand why that would be an issue, as stewards turn a blind eye to that normally so why would today be any different (stated in Gazette article)?

There’s a higher risk because the west stand has tiers

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Brunners said:

So essentially it is, yet again, a communication issue?

Sort off 

The club won't allow any standing and jumping in 69 cause of the tier...  The club have offered a lower section where safety is better .. But RF declined that and wanted to move further back instead... 

Then I GUESS that rumours and gossip and adding to the story made way for a tiny over reaction

This should be sorted weeks ago not few days/hours before the match though.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ABH said:

There’s a higher risk because the west stand has tiers

Just had a double check. For some weird reason I was thinking block 69 was their usual spot! Can see why they are being restricted now as Block 69 is in the West Stand. 

Still think a lack of communication is to blame for this issue. The club would have know weeks ago that they wanted to only open the West Stand. This coupled with the ticket debacle on Saturday is really not doing any favours with the already strained relationship between fans and the club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

Just had a double check. For some weird reason I was thinking block 69 was their usual spot! Can see why they are being restricted now as Block 69 is in the West Stand. 

Still think a lack of communication is to blame for this issue. The club would have know weeks ago that they wanted to only open the West Stand. This coupled with the ticket debacle on Saturday is really not doing any favours with the already strained relationship between fans and the club.

It comes down to poor planning from the club. I would of thought this would have been highlighted for the friendly game too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • You mean that the stuff I posted was correct?  Woo hoo! 🤸‍♂️🤸‍♂️🤸‍♂️
    • I was going to make fun of you and call you a nerd for producing your stats but I'm actually going to do the opposite. You've probably spent more time collecting that information than Woodgate has preparing for a game all season. Well done 👍🏻 I probably haven't watched as many games as you this season but what I've seen and read I think we've maybe looked a bit vulnerable in those positions when the two young players have had to defend. That doesnt mean to say they should be dropped from the team though, Coulson reminds me a bit of a young Alexander Arnold in the fact that he's great going forward which obviously leaves him a bit exposed. The obvious thing to do would be to have a holding midfielder in the team who can drop into that position when we are being countered but a good tactician should be able to do a number of things to counteract against that.  Rather than focus on what the young full backs don't do well I think the manager should focus on what they can do. Both give us energy and an attacking outlet. The easy thing to do in this situation is bring all the older players back, having a confirmation bias about young players not being ready for a relegation fight is something I'd level at the manager more than the fans though. 
    • I don't think walking away from a mess you've helped to create is a decent thing to do, to be honest. I don't personally get that point of view, I know you're not the only one who has said it and I know it was said plenty last season under Pulis too but if he isn't doing his job properly, it's not on him to judge himself so badly to walk away in my opinion. It's on the club to remove him. I think it shows a lack of character to walk away and take yourself away from the responsibility of it.
    • Sounds like he really, genuinely is at a loss, rather than just being stubborn. Seems like he's saying what he'd like to do, versus what he's actually able to do with the squad he has, then getting confused between the two. He's having to play high stakes poker with a pretty average hand (while also being a novice player) and no matter what he tries, he keeps getting taken to the cleaners. Also, experienced isn't necessarily the same as good. Unless, as rumours suggest, he has lost the dressing room and they just aren't trying anymore. Feeling the tiniest twinge of sympathy for him, but really this is 90% on him (at this stage - 100% on Gibson for hiring him in the first place). If he had any decency he'd have handed in his resignation weeks ago and forced Gibson to find someone who actually knows how to manage.   Quite honestly, at this stage, I think its irrelevant what team he puts out. The youngsters will maybe lack the experience to deal with what Leeds throw at us and the senior players won't put in the effort. Either way, the end result will be the same. (Now I've said this, watch us scrape a flukey draw)  
    • These are just stats.  I don't claim the give they answers to everything or even anything.  It's just information that can be used to look at things.  It's entirely possible that Coulson and Spence both just happened to be in the side when it became better defensively and started gaining more points.  So it would be no more than a coincidence and over time the stats would revert to the teams average.  But it's also possible that them being in the side made us better and that this is reflected in the stats above.   In the past I've spoken about the mind playing tricks on people because of received/conventional wisdom.  So in this example, received wisdom would be that younger, inexperienced players make you weaker defensively because they make more mistakes.  I'm sure most would say that's fair enough, at least to some extent.  And because this thought is already in people's minds then that's what they 'see' or 'look' for in games and therefore it becomes true and reinforces the received wisdom.  I do wonder if that could be the case here?  Our worst defensive efforts this season came in games where neither of the youngsters played (Sheff Wed at home, Leeds away, that shambles of a game at Birmingham come to mind) and yet I read on here (and now from Woodgate) that they are to blame for us conceding goals with the reason that's often give that it's because teams are attacking those areas.  They've been attacking those areas all season long and every other area.  But that's not the problem anyway.  Because our defensive record this season is the 12th best in the league.  The issue is that our goal scoring record is the joint worst in the league and that's why we are in trouble.
×
×
  • Create New...