Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
boro-unger

Boro v Bristol City (A) 2-2 (Moore (og) Assombalonga)

Recommended Posts

On 8/31/2019 at 2:29 PM, BillinghamBoro said:

*board pessimist coming through* 

Enjoyed that game really did. Good goal for Britt and still felt sorry for the Bristol centre half for slicing through his own net. 

Played well going forward but goodness me we are horrendous at the back, needs sorting out asap. 

Dijksteel looks uncomfortable still, but he might grow in to the team after time. 

Remember that Dijksteel has just 29 league appearances at RB, and just 43 in total. He has only been a pro for 2 seasons and only really a regular starter for half a season. He is very, very raw. More so than Bola who at least went through the Arsenal academy, Dijksteel came through non-league AFC Amsterdam and then via Nike Academy before entering the pro game.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/31/2019 at 2:31 PM, BoroSmoggie said:

Ayala is a huge player for us, I doubt we’d have conceded either of them goals if he was playing. 

The question is do we drop Shotton who’s played well last two games, or Fry who was at fault for both goals today? I presume Shotton, but it would almost be a bit harsh now. 

Long term Fry and Ayala is a promotion partnership at the back.

Bola.....Fry.......Ayala.......Shotton

 

job done

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From memory I thought Britt was offside though. Yes the last touch came off their defender but wasnt he in an offside position when the first pass was played? It would be different if Britt was in an 'offside' position and snuck onto a dodgy backpass as thats come from an opposition player but surely he was active from Claytons (?) ball over. Id be furious if it was a goal againsy us. About time we got lucky.

I gotta watch it again now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ChipBarrington said:

From memory I thought Britt was offside though. Yes the last touch came off their defender but wasnt he in an offside position when the first pass was played? It would be different if Britt was in an 'offside' position and snuck onto a dodgy backpass as thats come from an opposition player but surely he was active from Claytons (?) ball over. Id be furious if it was a goal againsy us. About time we got lucky.

I gotta watch it again now!

As long as Moore deliberate heads the ball .. Assombalonga could be standing next to the goalkeeper without ever being offside! ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, ChipBarrington said:

From memory I thought Britt was offside though. Yes the last touch came off their defender but wasnt he in an offside position when the first pass was played? It would be different if Britt was in an 'offside' position and snuck onto a dodgy backpass as thats come from an opposition player but surely he was active from Claytons (?) ball over. Id be furious if it was a goal againsy us. About time we got lucky.

I gotta watch it again now!

Doesn't matter. If the defender makes a deliberate attempt to play the ball, it negates the offside. You're not considered active at the point the pass is made.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Brunners said:

Doesn't matter. If the defender makes a deliberate attempt to play the ball, it negates the offside. You're not considered active at the point the pass is made.

The argument could be made that Britt being in an offside position forces Moore to have to try and make a play on the ball (given that at the time he doesn't know if Britt is offside or not) therefore Britt was active and influencing play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Will said:

The argument could be made that Britt being in an offside position forces Moore to have to try and make a play on the ball (given that at the time he doesn't know if Britt is offside or not) therefore Britt was active and influencing play.

Given Moore was a fair bit away from Britt, and wasn't actually facing him, I'm not sure he really knew he was there, let alone in an offside position. I doubt he'd have headed in his path if he did, though it doesn't look like he had too much control on the direction of it.

I think it's a rule that's always going to be controversial though, as you're almost always going to gain a slight advantage by being offside even if you're not active.

Edited by TeaCider24

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Will said:

The argument could be made that Britt being in an offside position forces Moore to have to try and make a play on the ball (given that at the time he doesn't know if Britt is offside or not) therefore Britt was active and influencing play.

Thats my view. How is a striker not active when he is running free towards goal with the ball coming over the top to him with 2 defenders trying to prevent that and by trying, idadventantly played him onside by nature of the law. Such a stupid murky sey of rules.

 

Maybe soon we will have defenders on the other side of the pitch not classed as active

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to echo what others have said really.

I was happily surprised with the performance overall against a team who may well be up challenging at the top this year. I agree with the comments about the weakness at the back and I think more confidence and more clinical finishing is needed in attack too but overall I was happy to see a game and performance from Boro that excited me.

Here's hoping Boro can improve on that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Will said:

The argument could be made that Britt being in an offside position forces Moore to have to try and make a play on the ball (given that at the time he doesn't know if Britt is offside or not) therefore Britt was active and influencing play.

The counter-argument is that he's not concerned with Britt as he doesn't know where he is, he just wants to head the ball back in the direction of the attacking players. In that situation, Britt's position holds no weight at all as he's not challenging for the ball. It certainly looked either way like the player tried to play the ball forward, got underneath it and got it wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/style-over-substance-only-last-16850509.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Interesting comments here from Andy Hinchcliffe regarding our new style. He's saying pretty much what I was thinking on Saturday. 

Although its refreshing to see us playing positively we still need to get points on the board, its early days so there's no need to panic but our current point haul isn't good despite an easy set of fixtures. Against better teams I wonder whether we might need to be less open or be more controlled in the way we play. 

Think there's a fine line at the moment between us being an entertaining mid table team or a cavalier bottom 6 side. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well we did better than I thought. Lots of positives, and now we have time to improve on the training pitch. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Duvel said:

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/style-over-substance-only-last-16850509.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Interesting comments here from Andy Hinchcliffe regarding our new style. He's saying pretty much what I was thinking on Saturday. 

Although its refreshing to see us playing positively we still need to get points on the board, its early days so there's no need to panic but our current point haul isn't good despite an easy set of fixtures. Against better teams I wonder whether we might need to be less open or be more controlled in the way we play. 

Think there's a fine line at the moment between us being an entertaining mid table team or a cavalier bottom 6 side. 

I'm not worried yet. As you say, it's early days. I mentioned that we'll play better sides than Bristol City away from home so it'll be interesting to see how we approach those games. Will we go for it Fulham away in January? We probably will Leeds away regardless but it's by the time you'd hope our team will have settled a bit more at the end of November. West Brom away the last game before the new year is another worth thinking about in that regard. Will that attitude earn us anything? We shall see.

As for less open teams, I also said we still need to figure out how to unlock them and just as importantly, defend against their direct threats.

Still, I've very little fear of anything bad happening this season right now. Still January to come and good players will be targeted and may have their heads turned by teams challenging at the top so we'll see how we deal with that but I think we should be comfortably mid-table at least by January.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • How bad do people think it would need to get for Woodgate's job to be called into question? I can easily see us losing away to Barnsley then losing two more on the bounce to Leeds and Forest. We would be teetering on the edge of the bottom 3, if not in it.  Would then be the time to roll the dice on a Warnock type keeping us up? Or will Gibson trudge on no matter how bad things get? I have a really nasty feeling we will ditch Woody once we're cut adrift from safety and it'll be too late for anyone else to change anything. 
    • I'm not ITK in any way, but I think the aim is to ensure MFC can survive long-term without reliance on Sky money. I guess we took that for granted in the PL days, and the last decade has shown how thin the gruel really is when your highlights appear on Quest rather than the BBC. Steve Gibson's antipathy towards agents has been documented in the past, so he probably hated pouring millions into empty vessels like Guzan and Barragan while we were in the PL. I'd imagine his current vision is for us to become a Southampton-style club, keeping afloat by selling the cream of its home-grown talent to bigger clubs, and building on the Teesside sense of us-vs-the-world to forge a strong connection between players, management, club and fans. There's only so many times you can bet the family silver on incompetents like Monk and Strachan and their here-today-gone-tomorrow mercenaries. Unfortunately, Gibson has lost touch with modern football, and what it takes to be competitive. He lucked out with Karanka, but appointing Woodgate was the latest in a string of fundamentally bad decisions he's made post-Aitor, including (but not limited to) thinking Steve Agnew was the answer to staying in the PL. Woodgate isn't up to the job, but who among us would say "no thanks, Mr Gibson, I'm not sufficiently qualified for this position at present?" We'd bite his bloody arm off to do what Woody is attempting to do. I think there was a masterplan before this season started - more than we've seen since Aitor arrived. But it's failed. Gibson either isn't ready to admit that, or still believes a relegation dogfight is the bitter medicine we have to swallow to become the club I described two paragraphs earlier. Tragically, if we'd appointed a DoF five years ago, we'd probably already be there. It would be interesting to see Gibson's level of interest in MFC if we end up down with the dead men in League One. Let's hope he pulls a Venables-style rabbit out of the hat before we get to that point.
    • I’m sure that it was a club decision, that makes it seem even dafter. There are factions in dressing rooms at every club, that’s just human nature, you get on with the people that you have most in common with.    Anyway, it really didn’t work did it?
    • I honestly think the main goal is too become self sufficient... of course promotion but I think the days of Gibson spending exuberant amounts of ££ are long gone.. short term aim is to ensure we are in this league next season whilst continuing to reduce the wage bill. Medium Term Aim is to create an team of youngsters with a spine of experience and hope we can improve as a team. Do I think SG has lost interest... No is my honest opinion... have we made awful decisions... yes without doubt.. allowing Bevington to take control of transfers in the summer was by far our worse move... set us back more than  just Woody. Was woody on a hiding to nothing... Yes he is a local lad being hung out to dry , I know we all criticise him etc but how many of you would of taken the job of managing your home town club.. no brainer for him , only a tenth of what Jokanovic plus his staff wanted. Really wish we got a DoF in place and was told that's what Woody wanted as well. With regards to the PR the club are spouting that's just Natural. Season ticket sales etc are the main aim now. We dont sell many then the club can say we didnt have the funds to sign anyone in summer.  Am I confident in Woody... not really , would I love to see him succeed? Without a doubt. He needs to find a settled 11 for the remainder of the season and stick with it though. Only way we grind it out in my opinion.
    • A Barnsley v Boro (Fletcher) H Birmingham v Sheff Wed A Bristol City v WBA  H Charlton v Luton D Leeds v Reading H Forest v QPR H PNE v Hull D Stoke v Cardiff H Swansea v Huddersfield H Wigan v Millwall
×
×
  • Create New...