Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

NFL talk 21


Recommended Posts

I have tried repeatedly - and failed miserably - to make any sense whatsoever of American Rugby. Only Americans would invent a game where the ball is controlled primarily with the hands and call it football!

They also like to make fun of soccer and how we can spend 90 minutes watching a game that ends 0-0.

But they can spend 4 hours watching a game that stops every few seconds, while the teams form up for a new set piece, or because one of the coaches calls a time out, or wants to basically swap their team over. It just does my head in! 

I'm just happy that they're equally baffled by cricket and think its some weird Limey version of baseball (another sport that makes no sense to me at all).

 

 

Edited by AnglianRed
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 294
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This just highlights how bad Spence positional play really is 🤷‍♂️

Of Antonio Brown? God damn man, where to start. Here are a number of things that he's done, mostly this off season but a couple date back to prior years. 1. Wants out of Pittsburgh - makes i

This is for those of us who follow the NFL! Join in by telling us which team you support!  I have been supporting Tampa Bay Buccaneers for 18 years, and that has been really bad for the last 15

Posted Images

1 hour ago, wilsoncgp said:

Every time I think about the NFL structure, instead of trying to understand it, I just think of this clip from Baseketball:

 

Still one of my favourite films of all time.

8 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

I have tried repeatedly - and failed miserably - to make any sense whatsoever of American Rugby. Only the Americans would invent a game where the ball is controlled primarily with the hands and call it football!

They also like to make fun of soccer and how we can spend 90 minutes watching a game that ends 0-0.

But they can spend 4 hours watching a game that stops every few seconds, while the teams form up for a new set piece, or because one of the coaches calls a time out, or wants to basically swap their team over. It just does my head in! 

I'm just happy that they're equally baffled by cricket and think its some weird Limey version of baseball (another sport that makes no sense to me at all).

American Football can take a little to get into; but once you do it's fascinating to watch. It's essentially a chess match on the field, with defences trying to work out what offences are doing and vice versa. 

There is a stupidly large amount of ad breaks though, it's very annoying. There's only 60 minutes of actual game time but a game will last usually 3+ hours. 

Baseball though, I don't know how that makes no sense, baseball is very easy to understand! Boring, but easy!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AnglianRed said:

I have tried repeatedly - and failed miserably - to make any sense whatsoever of American Rugby. Only Americans would invent a game where the ball is controlled primarily with the hands and call it football!

They also like to make fun of soccer and how we can spend 90 minutes watching a game that ends 0-0.

But they can spend 4 hours watching a game that stops every few seconds, while the teams form up for a new set piece, or because one of the coaches calls a time out, or wants to basically swap their team over. It just does my head in! 

I'm just happy that they're equally baffled by cricket and think its some weird Limey version of baseball (another sport that makes no sense to me at all).

 

 

Pretty simple tbh, the ball is (roughly) a foot long

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brunners said:

Still one of my favourite films of all time.

American Football can take a little to get into; but once you do it's fascinating to watch. It's essentially a chess match on the field, with defences trying to work out what offences are doing and vice versa. 

There is a stupidly large amount of ad breaks though, it's very annoying. There's only 60 minutes of actual game time but a game will last usually 3+ hours. 

Baseball though, I don't know how that makes no sense, baseball is very easy to understand! Boring, but easy!

You see that makes perfect to read sense. When you are talking about a game you get all Americanised. You use words like garbage and totally and oh my god. Words you never use in real life or when talking about the Boro. I think that’s my biggest gripe about this nfl thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Blanco said:

You see that makes perfect to read sense. When you are talking about a game you get all Americanised. You use words like garbage and totally and oh my god. Words you never use in real life or when talking about the Boro. I think that’s my biggest gripe about this nfl thread

I use the terms garbage, totally and oh my god all the time in real life 🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brunners said:

I use the terms garbage, totally and oh my god all the time in real life 🤣

Fair enough 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Blanco said:

Fair enough 😂

Especially garbage. When talking about something being bad, saying something is rubbish just sounds...I don't know, not as impactful? 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do use those words in real life

e.g.

Betty-Nelly was totally garbage for that cross. Oh my God he dropped it again

Easy

🤣

The thing about NFL is what Brunners said about the chess match. I've been a fan since the early 80's and figure I know about most of it but I think there is another level of understanding that you only get from playing the game, which is something I haven't done. Some of the calls puzzle me and the commentators though..

One of the reasons that Football/Soccer is getting more popular in the US is that they are finally realising that it doesn't take a whole lot of expense to play the game - the US will eventually get really good at it due to physical attributes and fitness levels.

I quite like Baseball but Basketball is well hmmmm...

The game breaks are used to go and top up your beer and snacks BTW.

Great if you are at a game live but also in the house!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, AnglianRed said:

I have tried repeatedly - and failed miserably - to make any sense whatsoever of American Rugby. Only Americans would invent a game where the ball is controlled primarily with the hands and call it football!

They also like to make fun of soccer and how we can spend 90 minutes watching a game that ends 0-0.

But they can spend 4 hours watching a game that stops every few seconds, while the teams form up for a new set piece, or because one of the coaches calls a time out, or wants to basically swap their team over. It just does my head in! 

I'm just happy that they're equally baffled by cricket and think its some weird Limey version of baseball (another sport that makes no sense to me at all).

 

 

Cheers for that. Just wasted almost an hour watching NFL fans react to rugby. 😂😂😂

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Will said:

Pretty simple tbh, the ball is (roughly) a foot long

Ah, I see.

Yeah - American ft-ball just looks wrong, doesn't it? 

Or even worse - American '-ball...

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Uwe said:

Cheers for that. Just wasted almost an hour watching NFL fans react to rugby. 😂😂😂

Lmao!

I can just imagine the gasps of horror...

"Where are the helmets and padding?"

"Why don't they have time-outs?"

"Why aren't the end zones all brightly painted in the team colours?"

"Where are the cheerleaders and half time show?"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Rugby players occasionally try and become NFL players. I can't remember if one has ever become a starter though? I know the Bills have a former Rugby Union player called Christian Wade on their practice squad atm.

Lots of Australia Rules Football players going over to be punters and kickers as well.

1 hour ago, Snake said:

I do use those words in real life

e.g.

Betty-Nelly was totally garbage for that cross. Oh my God he dropped it again

Easy

🤣

The thing about NFL is what Brunners said about the chess match. I've been a fan since the early 80's and figure I know about most of it but I think there is another level of understanding that you only get from playing the game, which is something I haven't done. Some of the calls puzzle me and the commentators though..

One of the reasons that Football/Soccer is getting more popular in the US is that they are finally realising that it doesn't take a whole lot of expense to play the game - the US will eventually get really good at it due to physical attributes and fitness levels.

I quite like Baseball but Basketball is well hmmmm...

The game breaks are used to go and top up your beer and snacks BTW.

Great if you are at a game live but also in the house!

Yeah I've "only" been a fan since about 2008, and I learn new stuff every single week. Especially with how terrible the officiating is; I learn new rules that they've got wrong literally every game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Brunners said:

For what it's worth, Rugby players occasionally try and become NFL players. I can't remember if one has ever become a starter though?

I know Jarryd Hayne (Rugby League) gave it ago a few years ago and I think he actually played a few NFL games. Not 100% if he did actually play in the NFL or if it was like the Wade situation.

Problem is, both games are so different, Rugby players are conditioned to perform over 80 minutes. NFL is near enough maximum effort in short 15/20 second bursts. It's incredibly hard to go from one to the other, as one requires aerobic fitness the other quite often anaerobic.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

I know Jarryd Hayne (Rugby League) gave it ago a few years ago and I think he actually played a few NFL games. Not 100% if he did actually play in the NFL or if it was like the Wade situation.

Problem is, both games are so different, Rugby players are conditioned to perform over 80 minutes. NFL is near enough maximum effort in short 15/20 second bursts. It's incredibly hard to go from one to the other, as one requires aerobic fitness the other quite often anaerobic.

I always thought that Adama Traore would have made a great rushing back or punt return specialist

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

I know Jarryd Hayne (Rugby League) gave it ago a few years ago and I think he actually played a few NFL games. Not 100% if he did actually play in the NFL or if it was like the Wade situation.

Problem is, both games are so different, Rugby players are conditioned to perform over 80 minutes. NFL is near enough maximum effort in short 15/20 second bursts. It's incredibly hard to go from one to the other, as one requires aerobic fitness the other quite often anaerobic.

Looks like he played in 8 games but mostly special teams.

They also have the issue of learning a game from scratch at 27-30 that everyone else has been learning since childhood, so they're way behind the curve.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • Forget fancy Dan formations this squad is crying out for 442 two fast wingers ,Crooks and Tav in the middle ,a solid stay at home defenders ,find a goalie were all set.
    • Judging by the melt down on here, FMTTM, plus comments in the Gazette, Warnock is walking a tightrope. Anything less than a sterling display v Reading will seal his fate. A live match to ponder the teams short comings with NW's histrionics on the sideline will leave a lot of unhappy campers. Hopefully the team and Warnock are up to the challenge. UTB.
    • It’s not like they’d make a secret plan to get warnock to quit. The guy meant Scott will get on with the job he’s tasked to do, he will want to make an impression and get things going ASAP. His interference will probably annoy warnock who will most likely walk if results carry on as they are.  If gibson didn’t want Scott to throw his weight about and make certain decisions then he wouldn’t have employed him. Equally if gibson hadn’t given/promised Scott certain responsibilities then he probably wouldn’t have took the job. He isn’t just here to be a scout.
    • I think you are reading and interpreting what you want to get angry about rather than what i actually said. I expect every manager to have his approval on all signings even Warnock, even though he wont be here in a years time. Peltier was signed as cover for Fisher who we knew was out for a long while, we absolutely needed him. He clearly can plug a gap, not ideal, but he did ok at LB. we absolutely needed another CB. McNair is useless in a back 4 but ok in a back 3. Like I say, I expect every manager to plan for their team and have their approval over the choice of an owner. As for Scott, we have no way of knowing how successful he will be, what his Job description is or how much autonomy he will have, you are peeing in the wind if you hazard an answer. Gibson has always been hands on,, i don’t see that changing sadly. Since 2006 the owners vision has been wrong more than right, as have his appointments. Don’t take that to mean I am ungrateful for his efforts, without him, we’d not have a club, but goodness me he is due a right decision. I know he is trying his utmost but is having to do so with an imbalanced squad. He does not sign players, that isn’t his job it is Gibson and Bausor that do a deal or walk away. They have tried hard to fix the final third with more pace, flair and finishing, unfortunately the defence has been holed as a result.    I am not suggesting Spence and Coulson were great players, but they are better than nothing. Are you suggesting Warnock prefers Jones as a LB to Coulson? He doesn’t, he is having to make do and mend.  We have no holding midfielder. Howson is doing a job but it is not his best position. He is not refusing to sign foreign left backs at all, you are spinning his comments. He said they haven’t found anyone that fits the bill after being unable to fund UK based LB’s. Why you interpret it as a refusal is odd when he had no say over Morsy and some other signings is beyond silly. Getting a player to agree to come knowing they are going to be mere cover, from abroad especially, in a pandemic too, when you have no money, will not be a doddle, it isn’t like a pic and mix at the cinema.    Get off his back and support his efforts for now, he is not trying to set us up to fail, he has the best record of any manager in the league, but that was with his mix of players, blame the players for their part in the poor performances too and the goals we concede. Warnock deserves some criticism but it needs to be for his failures, not those of others. You can rejoice his departure come May which isn’t long for you to wait. 
    • Then it's not all about Scott. It'll never be all about anyone else with Gibson around. Scott undoubtedly doesn't want Warnock as manager to begin with, it doesn't fit with anything he's been involved in previously. Regardless though, Gibson isn't going to *** off his mate Warnock, he's not going to let someone dictate to Warnock how to do his job, and the idea that they'd try and annoy Warnock into quitting is ridiculous.

×
×
  • Create New...