Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
SmogDane

January transfer window 19/20 season Post Mortem

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Bristol_Boro said:

It's become more complicated because the player they want to replace Gibson with is Dael Fry. 

Higher offer for Dael is imminent 

Ben won't be heading south

They can have Shotton instead!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Rinse 'em the way Blackburn rinsed us for Rhodes.

Yep for me there's a Leeds tax that adds a few mil onto any fee.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brunners said:

Yep for me there's a Leeds tax that adds a few mil onto any fee.

And make sure they pay us straight away this time, and we don't have to wait a year like we did before we saw any of Bamford's fee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leeds are desperate for a striker. Their fans are turning on Bamford and he is more or less their only senior striker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Rinse 'em the way Blackburn rinsed us for Rhodes.

Tried to rinse us*. Albeit i think we would all accept a fee similar to whar we paid for Rhodes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Borodane said:

Leeds are desperate for a striker. Their fans are turning on Bamford and he is more or less their only senior striker.

Bamford and 5 Mil for Britt 🙂

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Borodane said:

Leeds are desperate for a striker. Their fans are turning on Bamford and he is more or less their only senior striker.

I actually think bamford would excel under a manager like Woodgate but lets move on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, scotty189 said:

Bamford and 5 Mil for Britt 🙂

 

That would just put them in the same spot with one senior striker 🙂 Maybe they'd take Gestede too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's odd that Burnley want a replacement for a player that has played one league game in nearly two years ???. As for Britt to Leeds. Get as much as we can get as soon as possible. Leeds are desperate for a striker as Fulham are right on their tails. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Britt for Bamford swap deal, I'd snap your bloody hands off.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TeaCider24 said:

I'd sooner hang on to Britt than help Leeds.

I'd take 10 mil and reinvest it. Don't care if it helps Leeds as long as it makes us stronger in the long run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • I don't even blame the majority of the people getting on the trains because most of them will be key workers. However, if we can't manage the situation better then the tube would be better off just being closed, doctors and nurses could be put up in hotels close to their place of work or taxis should be laid on.  A packed tube will be like an incubator for the virus and the situation surely can't carry on like this. Another point is that apparently the construction sites are still supposed to be working as normal in London which will also add to the passenger numbers on public transport. Why aren't the government clamping down on the construction industry?  I'm glad to have lived in a society where we have a lot of freedom but in the current situation I think the government needs to exert more control especially in London. 
    • I mean, it was a stupid ass decision to reduce the number of services in the hope it would reduce the number of people per tube. Khan is saying drivers are self-isolating or are ill themselves. Obviously the latter is unavoidable but given the scale of the tube usage, surely tube drivers should be considered key workers too? How many of them will be in self-enforced isolation who could feasibly be working? Though I'm willing to bet it's not just key workers who are using them and perhaps an alternative is to start ensuring valid reasons for travel instead of just letting anyone use them. There's potential problems with all of the solutions but the main problem as ever is the people who use them. I lived there, anyone else who has or does and has dealt with the Central Line for a short period of time, never mind the 3 years I did, will know it feels like 90% of the people going to work in the capital every day felt they were more important and more significant to the world than the people around them, the very peak of the capitalist society we live in where some people would step on their dead grandmother for an extra few bob. It gets in your bones too, it's almost beyond your control to be the same as them because you know as soon as you hold open a metaphorical door for the more vulnerable, those who are perfectly fine will capitalise on your good gesture and will never give you credit for your good deed. This virus has levelled the playing field significantly in that we are reminded about how individually, we are all important and all our individual decisions can impact so many other people. The maths is simple. If you can feasibly do so, staying at home is going to be hugely positive in delaying the spread of this virus. It's important that those of us who can, do so, in order to allow those who can't to be less at risk.
    • It's sounding most likely that the season will be completed in June/July behind closed doors.
    • We would even settle for you up front Alan with Teddy as your support striker 😂
×
×
  • Create New...