Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
FamilyBoro

Boro V Nottingham Forest (A) 1-1 (McNair pen)

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Duvel said:

I didn't notice anyone on here suggesting we should have been attacking for 90 minutes, maybe some people just wanted a bit more balance between attack and defense. 

It was a good point away from home, we looked decent in the last 20 minutes and I thought we actually defended well before that as well. I'm not going to pretend that we looked anything other than a Pulis team last night though.

I'll accept Pulis style football for now because we are lacking players and points are vital, but at some point there needs to be a slight transition in style. 

I don't accept it.  We actually look ok when we don't play like that yet here we are again where people have talked themselves into this idea that we must play like this.  Playing like this has gotten us to where we are now.  Playing attacking football hasn't because we've barely bloody done it all season long yet people are terrified of it because we'll probably get 'trounced'.  It's not based on anything at all but somehow the idea has cemented itself among fans.  We'll be a better team when we aren't sitting back and trying to defend our way through games all of the time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

I don't accept it.  We actually look ok when we don't play like that yet here we are again where people have talked themselves into this idea that we must play like this.  Playing like this has gotten us to where we are now.  Playing attacking football hasn't because we've barely bloody done it all season long yet people are terrified of it because we'll probably get 'trounced'.  It's not based on anything at all but somehow the idea has cemented itself among fans.  We'll be a better team when we aren't sitting back and trying to defend our way through games all of the time.

We havent played attacking football since we were relegated (not that we did before) and we have only gone backwards to the point where we are in a relegation battle and supposedly in dire straits financially with only a few sellable assets. So no, I'm not going to accept it either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Changing Times said:

I don't accept it.  We actually look ok when we don't play like that yet here we are again where people have talked themselves into this idea that we must play like this.  Playing like this has gotten us to where we are now.  Playing attacking football hasn't because we've barely bloody done it all season long yet people are terrified of it because we'll probably get 'trounced'.  It's not based on anything at all but somehow the idea has cemented itself among fans.  We'll be a better team when we aren't sitting back and trying to defend our way through games all of the time.

I've got no faith in Woodgate having the coaching ability or tactical nouse to be able to find a balance between attack and defence.

I'm basically resigned to the fact that the best he's capable off is parking the bus (away from home anyway). 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well damn, that was a point I wasn't expecting.

Didn't see or listen to the game, but reading the BBC's match report, sounds like it was a pretty dour affair.

According to the stats, Forest had way more possession & corners, but both sides had exactly the same number of shots at goal & on target.

In any case, that could end up being a valuable point and given I was expecting us to be soundly spanked, I can only say "well done lads".

 

With that result, our last 6 games read: W2 D3 L1

 

Is it too early to say we've turned the corner...or a corner, at least?

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only managed to listen until just before they scored and up until that point at least it did sound dreadful.

We didn’t seem to be doing much of anything and forest fans were booing their players for ‘sideways and backwards’ passing.

That said it is a good point away at forest coming from behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given how poor our outcome usually is at Forest, then a point with this team is a wonderful thing! 

Imagine supporting Forest and watch that game .. You would feel robbed, but still think it was deserved, cause Forest let Boro attack, when they got the 1-0 lead ...  Does this sound familiar? 😄 

Good point! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My two pence worth

that was a game that proves you get what you deserve if you try to sit back, contain (or whatever you want to call it) when you don’t have the speed or flair to break effectively when one of your limited chances arises. We did it for a hour (by the skin of our teeth) and ultimately conceded. Forest tried it for half a hour and got what they deserved. Horrible to watch if it’s your team that’s defending and it paints a incorrect picture if it’s your team that’s attacking, as you look much better than you actually are. I hope JW takes this into account for Saturday 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We sat back, conceded chances not goals but frustrated Forest and got their fans annoyed,luckily didnt concede then came out and salvaged an unlikely draw....sounds like how lots of teams have come to the Riverside over the years. 

We started praying for points no matter how we played, now people are complaing that we got a point but didnt set up and play very well....

Just look at our team:

 

Gk - inexperienced

Lwb - inexperienced

Cb - solid champ defender

Cb - solid champ CM

Cb - promising, couple of seasons deep

Rwb - 2nd first team game?

Cm - solid champ cm

Cm - solid champ cm, argueably losing his legs

Cm - 'future captain'😶

Cm - inexperienced

St - couple of seasons around champ

 

Bench - Marv, Mejias and a couple of competition winners from Kings Manor

 

We are chopping and changing style and personel on a weekly basis so inconsistent performances should be expected. Woody put out what he though was the best team, and to be fair he changed shaped (maybe not tactic) at HT so to say he accepted the first half is harsh. Everyone can see we cant defend, but I do kinda understand just trying to shut Forest out. 

I wasnt born in 86, but when people go on about it you hear of the team of local lads everyone got behind. Our mash up squad just got a point away to Forest...fine by me.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • Hold on a second, just stop right there please. Rather than pull out the argument crap or the tin foil crap or whatever, why not take the point of view that perhaps people just disagree with you and they aren't doing it to be arsey.  It's getting a bit tedious now mate as you seem to think it's your right to say whatever you like unchallenged. I didn't say his changes recently are up for discussion because they are of his choice.  I never said anything about recent decisions at all. I said the decisions he has chosen to make, those not forced upon him, whenever he made them, are up for discussion and that those changes haven't lead to any improvement.  We can focus on the latest ones if you like but I'd say that's a season long thing, it's not like we weren't making changes earlier in the season because let's face it, we changed dramatically right at the start of the season, before any injuries occurred.  I mean we moved away from what appeared to be his preferred way of playing after about a 135 mins of football - it had bugger all to do with injuries and it had nothing to with results as we hadn't really played any games!   A draw at Luton and 45 mins against Brentford?  He panicked and made changes because he wanted to not because his hand was forced.  So, he can win in this discussion by winning on the pitch, now, then, whenever.  We aren't winning on the pitch, his changes haven't tended to work and that's the issue.  You're trying to turn it into a 'he can't win' scenario because you're trying to defend him.  That's your prerogative just as it's mine to point out that it's ***.  Ok?
    • Thats just par for the course and goes for any sports team. They're happy to talk about anything when things are going well, but stick rigidly to the script when the *** hits the fan (and if they do try to be honest they end up contradicting themselves, as you saw). I wouldn't expect to get any sense out of anyone at the club, until the after the other shoe has dropped and we either get relegated, get a new manager, or both. The truth tends to only come out long after the dust has settled.  
    • Take what you saw and multiply it for the whole 90 minutes. It was just him getting caught out of position time after time after time. I personally thought of the two wingbacks Johnson had the better game.
    • The changing of formation isn't the problem with Woody. I can understand why he has played both 4-3-3 and 3-5-2 for various circumstances. However the players constantly look totally lost and there is zero cohesion in what we are seemingly trying to do on the pitch. There is just no improvement at all like the players don't know what is expected of them. It looks like he's just sending them out to play 10 individual games. And it's everything from pressing, marking and attacking play. It's just completely random and it's very evident that he hasn't got the tools to put his points across - or simply doesn't have a clue at all. I'm leaning towards the latter.
×
×
  • Create New...