Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
boro-unger

Boro v Tottenham (FA Cup) 1-1 (Fletcher)

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

Well I'm not from Smog Town, so I can't be proud about that (did live there for a while though).

But this is probably the best I've felt about being a Boro supporter since our decade-plus stay in the Prem.

 

Really?

 

Better than the playoff season under Karanka? Or the promotion season?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Downsouth said:

Just wanted to say how sorry I am that your brilliant run is over Boro_Unger at least you did not bow out to a defeat.

Foogle you have a tough act to follow buddy!

I know we only drew, but isn't there a case for keeping BU doing league matchday threads, given how unlikely it was we'd win against Spurs?

I know Woody is suddenly a tactical genius, but we all know its really been his matchday threads that have turned our season around. 😁

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Will said:

Really?

 

Better than the playoff season under Karanka? Or the promotion season?

To be honest I've seen Boro yo-yo between the top and 2nd tier so many times that the shine has worn off a bit.

Play-offs? Meh.

Getting promoted under Karanka was great, but the excitement wore off pretty quickly when it became obvious we were on a hiding to nothing and going straight back down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

To be honest I've seen Boro yo-yo between the top and 2nd tier so many times that the shine has worn off a bit.

Play-offs? Meh.

Getting promoted under Karanka was great, but the excitement wore off pretty quickly when it became obvious we were on a hiding to nothing and going straight back down.

So instead you are more excited about 16th in the Championship and a draw against a decent Premier League side? I'm genuinely baffled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AnglianRed said:

I know we only drew, but isn't there a case for keeping BU doing league matchday threads, given how unlikely it was we'd win against Spurs?

I know Woody is suddenly a tactical genius, but we all know its really been his matchday threads that have turned our season around. 😁

 

Believe me I did wrestle with this but others are waiting their turn, however I just might recall BU early if the situation arises:classic_cool:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, AnglianRed said:

How far apart do you live? 😂

She sits on one end of the couch and I sit on the other. The middle is like no man's land. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder what kind of money we will e making from these two games, instead of going out against Newport. A game at Spurs new big stadium must be worth something. Maybe enough to cover a certain loan deal for a certain nephew.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Borodane said:

Wonder what kind of money we will e making from these two games, instead of going out against Newport. A game at Spurs new big stadium must be worth something. Maybe enough to cover a certain loan deal for a certain nephew.

FA cup is like basically 50/50 split on gate receipts (I think it's actually something like 45/45 with FA taking final 10%), and I imagine it will get televised as well. They're averaging about 58-59k at home this season, so it should be a fair old chunk of change.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Brunners said:

FA cup is like basically 50/50 split on gate receipts (I think it's actually something like 45/45 with FA taking final 10%), and I imagine it will get televised as well. They're averaging about 58-59k at home this season, so it should be a fair old chunk of change.

 

Quick math; 50k tickets sold at roughly 25 pounds equals 1.250.000 so roughly 500k for each club plus the TV money. I have no idea what they are selling tickets at for the game, but it can't be expensive. A weeknight third round fixture against a lower league team. Not bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Brunners said:

FA cup is like basically 50/50 split on gate receipts (I think it's actually something like 45/45 with FA taking final 10%), and I imagine it will get televised as well. They're averaging about 58-59k at home this season, so it should be a fair old chunk of change.

 

Don’t think it is on live tv, so no fees there ( £72k, if it is). Replays is 42.5% of gate each. apart from FA 10%,  the other 5% goes to be split between any non league club that got through to first round proper, apparently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ScarBoro said:

Don’t think it is on live tv, so no fees there ( £72k, if it is). Replays is 42.5% of gate each. apart from FA 10%,  the other 5% goes to be split between any non league club that got through to first round proper, apparently. 

Interesting, didn't know about that 5% I knew non league clubs really want to make the 1st round proper but I always thought it was for prestige, but it makes even more sense if they also get a trickle down of gate receipts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Brunners said:

FA cup is like basically 50/50 split on gate receipts (I think it's actually something like 45/45 with FA taking final 10%), and I imagine it will get televised as well. They're averaging about 58-59k at home this season, so it should be a fair old chunk of change.

 

Worth noting is that unlike other 'north' London clubs we announce attendance as bums on seats not tickets sold. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Foogle said:

Saville has really impressed the last couple of games, is it any coincidence that he's looked much better playing in a holding midfield 2 - as he did at Millwall - compared to when he's playing in a formation with 3/4 other centre mids?

Saville could be a beast in a Karanka set up 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, AnglianRed said:

To be honest I've seen Boro yo-yo between the top and 2nd tier so many times that the shine has worn off a bit.

Play-offs? Meh.

Getting promoted under Karanka was great, but the excitement wore off pretty quickly when it became obvious we were on a hiding to nothing and going straight back down.

Total anti climax ...

And then Monk got 50 m £ which Karanka should have had 6 months earlier!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Latest Posts

    • Businesses should be means tested much like people are for social welfare. There is no way bajillionaires like Branson should get away with furloughing staff, neither should businesses with 100's of millions of pounds income per year. 
    • Liverpool have reversed the decision now. Rightly so, in my opinion. 
    • I don’t think it’s down to the working class nature of football, boxers don’t get the same flack, I think it’s because clubs are very often the heart of a community. I remember chatting to a woman I met a few years ago who wouldn’t let her kids watch football because footballers were payed an obscene amount of money. I asked her if she allowed her kids to watch Hollywood movies, of course, she said!  
    • Wherever you stand on it... Footballers do always seem to be fair game when it comes to having a pop at the rich. Is it the working class nature of football? I've always wondered.  Where are the calls for musicians, actors, or even athletes from other well-paid sports to give up their earnings for the less fortunate? Or the bankers and CEOs who squirrel millions away into offshore accounts, taking from society and never giving back? At least footballers bring a bit of joy and entertainment to millions of people a couple of times a week. 
    • Yep, its a real sob story.  But in normal life, imagine if you could live comfortably on 10% of your takehome after buying your house and car. You would only have day to day expenses, holidays, etc. You take the rest of your salary and put it in one of those long term savings accounts (or whatever) that you cannot touch for 2 years. Then your salary is reduced and that 10% is no longer enough to cover your day to day. Regardless of how much actual money that is, when you try to force people to change their living circumstances you will always have push-back.  Now of course nobody earning decent money should be in that situation. It is recommended to split your savings, some in short term (easily retrieved), some in medium term (normally a wait period to retrieve) and some in long term (not normally retrievable) eg Property and pension.  On one hand it does highlight that these are just people, like all of us. On the other hand, they are fabulously wealthy and a target for those less well off who are revered when times are good and reviled when times are bad.  I don't blame the players for earning what they do, you make hay while the sun shines and we would all probably try to earn the same if circumstances were different. The clubs though are a different story and should be looking after the non mega-rich employees. 
×
×
  • Create New...