Jump to content
oneBoro Forum
Sign in to follow this  
OldManGravz

Boro v Birmingham 1-1 (Fletcher)

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Smogzilla said:

Aye he was drafted in last minute. Clearly a bit out of his comfort zone bless him! ūü§£

once and never again hopefully! the man had the personality of damp cardboard

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brunners said:

A few points from anyone who can't / hasn't watched the post match press conference.

- Wants/expects 1 or 2 more players in by end of windows

- Fry/Roberts more precautionary, hopefully not out too long

- Fletcher has really stepped up the last couple months, works hard in training

- Coulson is sick; has been since Fulham and is on antibiotics

- Thinks had Roberts stayed on the pitch we'd have won the game. Says he shouldn't put too much pressure on Roberts but sometimes can't help it because he's just that good.

- Thinks the reds were a little harsh, just a fracas, they'll all make up and have a beer afterwards.

- Was running down the line at the linesman yelling it's a head injury - points out they were offside for the actual goal anyway, so it would have been flagged off.

Thanks @Brunners. Just listened to it and just to add to your points.

- asked about Gibson and said lets wait and see. It seems clear we want him.

- asked if the 2 signings he expects are both defenders he said lets wait and see.

- said fry not for sale unless someone offering £30m

- britt back for blackburn. Shots and Friends to play in 2 reserves game. I elieve there are 2 games on Sun 2nd Feb and Fr 7th Feb.

- was confident about fry and roberts. These 11 days should do both them world of good in terms of rexovery.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Us bringing Tav back on doesn't change the course of events, mate. I don't think it was the right decision either but what actually happened has very little to do with our decision to bring him back on when we're talking about people calling it a knee injury vs. what it actually was.

I'm sure if we had a sub available, we'd have taken him off but clearly in the heat of the moment, he felt okay, we wanted to be at 11 players and so he went back on. On another day, it could have gone completely wrong and no, we shouldn't have done it. But I think that's a separate thing.

I wasn't at the game so I can only go by what I heard on Tees, they said Tav was 'out' after a head collision. 

If that's the case then the heat of the moment shouldn't have anything to do with the physios decision, neither should our lack of available subs. A physio has to make a decision based on the players health and after a head injury the situation of the game shouldn't be a factor. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 million pound public pricetag is about as firm as it gets as a stance from Woody on Fry and it's nice to hear him be that firm and bold on it to be honest big show of faith in Fry at the same time to set a Championship record price on his head publicly.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Duvel said:

I wasn't at the game so I can only go by what I heard on Tees, they said Tav was 'out' after a head collision. 

If that's the case then the heat of the moment shouldn't have anything to do with the physios decision, neither should our lack of available subs. A physio has to make a decision based on the players health and after a head injury the situation of the game shouldn't be a factor. 

 

Again, not disagreeing. More pointing out that you seem to be countering the point of Brum fans complaining about the head injury with our physios shouldn't be sending him back on. He was out, completely out, 3 or 4 Boro players and Lee Camp were all screaming for the game to stop and for physios to come on and the ref and his assistants completely ignored it, so much so that the physios ran on anyway.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad we don't have a game this weekend as we are absolutely desperate for a break.  Not a great game but we looked knackered and the injuries just added to it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Brunners said:

Was running down the line at the linesman yelling it's a head injury - points out they were offside for the actual goal anyway, so it would have been flagged off.

Haha, the linesman had actually flagged offside? Or was going to? If true, that's great. All this faff on and the goal wasn't even gonna get given anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

I'm glad we don't have a game this weekend as we are absolutely desperate for a break.  Not a great game but we looked knackered and the injuries just added to it.

Aye, we looked so void of energy. Could have really done with McNair putting that penalty away, like, might have been able to handle the game much better if we were the ones controlling the tempo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Again, not disagreeing. More pointing out that you seem to be countering the point of Brum fans complaining about the head injury with our physios shouldn't be sending him back on. He was out, completely out, 3 or 4 Boro players and Lee Camp were all screaming for the game to stop and for physios to come on and the ref and his assistants completely ignored it, so much so that the physios ran on anyway.

The Birmingham fans see our players and bench going hysterical because we wanted the game stopped. The goal gets disallowed then they see Tav running round a few minutes later. In their biased opinion they probably think he's feigning injury and we've robbed them off 2 points. 

To be honest if the roles were reversed I think our fans would be reacting the same. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pleased that Wood managed to aquit himself well when he came on. People forget just how young he is, ESPECIALLY for a centre back.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Duvel said:

The Birmingham fans see our players and bench going hysterical because we wanted the game stopped. The goal gets disallowed then they see Tav running round a few minutes later. In their biased opinion they probably think he's feigning injury and we've robbed them off 2 points. 

To be honest if the roles were reversed I think our fans would be reacting the same. 

They also think the league has a vendetta against them because of the referee's display tonight.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just watched the Tav incident on replay, I'm absolutely baffled that the ref didn't deem that a foul.

Even if he hadn't been knocked out by the second Birmingham player's elbow, he was completely wiped out by the first.

Pathetic.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smogzilla said:

Pleased that Wood managed to aquit himself well when he came on. People forget just how young he is, ESPECIALLY for a centre back.

Yeah, he looked a bit shook coming on in the first half but second half, he had a few really good moments for a very young lad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

Haha, the linesman had actually flagged offside? Or was going to? If true, that's great. All this faff on and the goal wasn't even gonna get given anyway.

I don't know if he had actually flagged, or if Woodgate was just sounding confident in his posturing, but he seemed pretty convinced it was going to be disallowed regardless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

They also think the league has a vendetta against them because of the referee's display tonight.

I'm sure not every Birmingham fan is that thick just like every Boro isn't completely stupid either. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  


  • Latest Posts

    • Hold on a second, just stop right there please.¬†Rather than pull out the argument crap or the tin foil crap or whatever, why not take the point of view that perhaps people just disagree with you and they aren't doing it to be arsey.¬† It's getting a bit tedious now¬†mate as you seem to think it's your right to say whatever you like unchallenged. I didn't say his changes recently are up for discussion because they are of his choice.¬† I never said anything about recent decisions at all.¬†I said the decisions he has chosen¬†to make, those not forced upon him, whenever he made them, are up for discussion and that those changes haven't lead to any improvement.¬† We can focus on the latest ones if you like but I'd say that's a season long thing, it's not like we weren't making changes earlier in the season because let's face it, we changed dramatically right at the start of the season, before any injuries occurred.¬† I mean we moved away from what appeared to be his preferred way of playing after about a 135 mins of football - it had bugger all to do with injuries and it had nothing to with¬†results as we hadn't really played any games!¬† ¬†A draw at Luton and 45 mins against Brentford?¬† He panicked and made changes¬†because he wanted to not because his hand was forced.¬† So, he can win in this discussion by winning on the pitch, now, then, whenever.¬† We aren't winning on the pitch, his changes haven't tended to work and that's the issue.¬† You're trying to turn it into a 'he can't win' scenario because you're trying to defend him.¬† That's your prerogative just as it's mine to point out that it's ***.¬† Ok?
    • Thats just par for the course and goes for any sports team. They're happy to talk about anything when things are going well, but stick rigidly to the script when the *** hits the fan (and if they do try to be honest they end up contradicting themselves, as you saw). I wouldn't expect to get any sense out of anyone at the club, until the after the other shoe has dropped and we either get relegated, get a new manager, or both. The truth tends to only come out long after the dust has settled. ¬†
    • Take what you saw and multiply it for the whole 90 minutes. It was just him getting caught out of position time after time after time. I personally thought of the two wingbacks Johnson had the better game.
    • The changing of formation isn't the problem with Woody. I can understand why he has played both 4-3-3 and 3-5-2 for various circumstances. However the players constantly look totally lost and there is zero cohesion in what we are seemingly trying to do on the pitch. There is just no improvement at all like the players don't know what is expected of them. It looks like he's just sending them out to play 10 individual games. And it's everything from pressing, marking and attacking play. It's just completely random and it's very evident that he hasn't got the tools to put his points across - or simply doesn't have a clue at all. I'm leaning towards the latter.
×
×
  • Create New...