Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

Boro v Wigan (A) 2-2 (Wing 2)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 569
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  •  

    48

  •  

    37

  •  

    37

  •  

    33

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Boro will be hitting the road once again, in search of their first win since their 2-0 victory at Preston on New Year's Day...blimey that seems a long time ago now! A spirited, though ultimately

We'd hopefully appoint a decent manager or head coach with the ability to succeed here I suppose.  I don't think Woodgate has demonstrated even slightly that he is that person and that's with people s

We were a mess yesterday, the players looked clueless and that is absolutely down to the manager in my opinion.  If you change your system and the players don't know what they are supposed to be doing

Posted Images

Pears

Spence-Fry-Moukoudi-Coulson

Howson-Saville-Wing

Nmecha-Britt-Fletcher

Plenty of pace on the outside with Spence, COulson, Nmecha and Fletcher. And solid in the middle. I really want us to go back to four at the back and with Fry/Moukoudi we should have a decent partnership. McNair was poor on saturday so wouldn't mind dropping him. Let Wigan worry about us and see how that front three can do together. Gestede is atrocious so I don't want him on. We should have enough to beat these, but I think it's going to be a draw. 1-1.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Liquid said:

We should win this one, but it's a bizarre league, one that one can never predict. We could do with a run, like a man who's gorged like Genghis Kahn over Christmas.

I didn't see the game but from the highlights, it looked like Saville was busy, like a Wall Street hack with 6 arms.

Morrison should start for me. He's the answer to our lack of Roberts, like Howdy's, on the corner of Dovecot Street.

3 at the back. I'd throw Spencer's and Morrison's in there, like Teesside Retail Park.

Exactly as BD said, Gestede can cause chaos late on, like a bad portion of doner meat from Yarm Lane.

Don't credit him for my words 😛 

Good post though 😛

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, AnglianRed said:

Personally I get jittery every time the opposition even gets near our 18-yard box. We seem to concede a lot of daft free kicks & commit needless fouls.

 

Exactly this. It's like we've thrown out the defensive effectiveness from the Karanka/Pulis era in our quest to be more adventurous at the other end of the pitch, but now we're neither fish nor fowl. We always look like conceding when the opposition charge at us. Hopefully the return of Ayala and the bedding-in of Moukoudi will help, but when I watched the defensive marking against Brentford, well, I couldn't, cos there wasn't any at times.

I daresay Pears still wakes up unable to believe his good fortune that Randolph has left and Meijas had such a mare in the replay against Spurs, but I do feel sorry for him given the lack of defensive support on offer at times.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, RiseAgainst said:

Exactly this. It's like we've thrown out the defensive effectiveness from the Karanka/Pulis era in our quest to be more adventurous at the other end of the pitch, but now we're neither fish nor fowl. We always look like conceding when the opposition charge at us. Hopefully the return of Ayala and the bedding-in of Moukoudi will help, but when I watched the defensive marking against Brentford, well, I couldn't, cos there wasn't any at times.

I daresay Pears still wakes up unable to believe his good fortune that Randolph has left and Meijas had such a mare in the replay against Spurs, but I do feel sorry for him given the lack of defensive support on offer at times.

Are we actually adventurous though? We commit more bodies forward than we did under Pulis but that isn't really saying much. 

I'm not sure what we are at the moment.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Duvel said:

Are we actually adventurous though? We commit more bodies forward than we did under Pulis but that isn't really saying much. 

I'm not sure what we are at the moment.  

We obviously miss some adventorous players. We looked like we had that when Roberts came in and with Spence and Coulson commiting forward with a bit of speed. But when Roberts broke down we've obviously missed that as we don't really have a player that can take a man on like that and make the opposition take their eyes off our other players. What we need in the summer is to try and find at least 1 player like that at. Reloaning Roberts would be a start and then one more. Watkins get's a lot of goals because Benrahma is so tricky and draws a lot of attention.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Duvel said:

Are we actually adventurous though? We commit more bodies forward than we did under Pulis but that isn't really saying much. 

I'm not sure what we are at the moment.  

No, we're not adventurous. That's the problem! We set up as if we're going to batter the opposition, and then we dither around playing it sideways. Getting bodies up the pitch is pointless if they're not on the same wavelength, and like you, I don't know what we're trying to achieve tactically.

Under Karanka, the players knew each others' games and the system so well, we played almost intuitively as a team. Now there are just players running around a lot and seeing what happens. It's more often an individual moment of flair that achieves something, rather than teamwork. And for that, we've sacrificed the 4+2 defensive unit in favour of endless chopping and changing. Three at the back? Four? Five? Johnson as a wingback? Who knows?

The only positives I can take from this lucky-dip approach to tactics and formations are (a) it occasionally works really well, and (b) opposition managers must get migraines trying to figure out what we're going to do.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SmogDane said:

Don't credit him for my words 😛 

Good post though 😛

Beg your absolute pardon SD!! 😳

What a mistake to make!!

Glad you knew what I meant! Too late for a ninja edit! 😅

Edited by Liquid
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Liquid said:

Beg my absolute pardon SD!! 😳

What a mistake to make!!

Glad you knew what I meant! Too late for a ninja edit! 😅

He gets it all from me anyway.

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said this before but I'd like to see 4-3-1-2 or a diamond with two up top perhaps.  We keep trying to play with wide attacking players when we don't really have them and we are weakening the middle of the park while we're doing it.  Nmecha hasn't really done anything since he's been here (other than work hard in fairness to him).  Johnson simply lacks quality but again works hard.  Fletcher further out wide hasn't tended to work much when we've tried it and Tavernier to me just isn't that type of player albeit we keep playing him there for whatever reason.  We'll play one of the usual set ups anyway but it's something different I'd like to see from us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a shame as Roberts actually looked like he was starting to give us some kind of threat out wide, albeit from cutting inside more often than not. Though as per Traore, there's always the worry when you have a one-sided wide threat that the opponent just shifts their entire defence to one side and you don't have the quality on the other side to punish it.

I don't mind the idea of a diamond or something akin to that so long as we have someone capable of covering the wings when the full-backs get forward. As soon as Fry and Moukoudi are out defending in the full-back spots, we're in trouble. With the 3 at the back, we at least had the covering centre-back in McNair sweeping up anything in behind but we don't have that with a 4.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Duvel said:

Are we actually adventurous though? We commit more bodies forward than we did under Pulis but that isn't really saying much. 

I'm not sure what we are at the moment.  

The players often give me the impression that they're not sure either.

You watch some teams building attacks (or counter attacking) with purpose, where the players know where their team mates will be and where to pass.

Then you contrast it with our rather haphazard forays, where one guy will usually try to go it alone, get to the penalty area, then find they have no support, or just one guy who is well marked. So they hit and hope or go sideways / backwards.
 

Sometimes we get it right and play good decisive football, but more usually its the headless chicken stuff.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Duvel said:

Are we actually adventurous though? We commit more bodies forward than we did under Pulis but that isn't really saying much. 

I'm not sure what we are at the moment.  

A bit crap...? I don't see any pattern or tactics to our attack. 

Looking forward to tonight regardless! Will take a flukey win. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...