Jump to content
oneBoro Forum

COVID-19 Life now and beyond


Recommended Posts

Just now, Changing Times said:

I think it depends if the joke is actually that I am keeping it going long past the point where I should have stopped.  Then the joke is actually on me.  Like the cracks about you being old, the joke is really on me, or that's how I see it anyway.

Oh totally, it’s the Stewart Lee technique. I see it the same way, we are all “characters” on a forum performing under aliases with pre-determined character traits. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I had my test results back and they were positive for Covid-19.. So lucky that I just had the mild symptoms!! 

Hope everyone's doing well and keeping healthy! Haven't posted for a few months due to being busy and the lack of football, but had a gradual read through this thread. Crazy looking back at the f

Branson owns an island and a spaceship, but he wants aid from the government and he’s happy to hang his employees out to dry the man is callous. 

Posted Images

18 minutes ago, BillyWoofs_shinpad said:

Oh totally, it’s the Stewart Lee technique. I see it the same way, we are all “characters” on a forum performing under aliases with pre-determined character traits. 

My character is that i'm a ***

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

This sounds exactly what my entire family had just before Christmas. Plus a constant chesty cough. We all got rid of it and it came back again a week later. I'm not saying we had Covid-19 before it was known about but there's a chance we could have.

I just thought it was worth pointing out that two people in my family, one in their 50s, one in their 80s, both believe they may have had COVID before there was a declared case in this country. A combination of factors could lead this to being plausible, largely the fact that we just don't know enough to be sure either way.

I'm a bit sceptical it was COVID, because we are led to believe it should be incredibly deadly to those in their 80s, because nobody but these 2 people in our extended family suffered from it, amongst other reasons. But just because it's deadly doesn't mean that this wasn't quite a mild case for someone in their 80s or that the rest of the family has had it but also had a very mild unrecognisable illness. Unlikely it was COVID but hey, who really knows right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Denzel Zanzibar said:

I think (and hope) that @Borodane is referring to the Chinese government and not the country of China as a whole. It's not the fault of the citizens that they live under communist rule.

Also without the Chinese we wouldn't have Chicken Egg Foo Yung and for that i'm eternally grateful.

Well I was speaking from a technological point of view. China is advanced as any other nation when it comes to computing, manufacturing, medical science and many other fields.

They have a pretty rich and colourful culture too.

The only real "backwards" elements stem from the government's Communist doctrine, which focuses on retaining power over the citizenry at all costs and sabre-rattling at other countries perceived as a threat.

I feel bad for the people. They've got some of the smartest minds and hardest workers, held back by a myopic, megalomaniac government.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

But anyway, this is no place for joviality, so let's get back to the misery and doom please!

Good god no! There's plenty of that as it is in the real world.

What we need here is more silliness. To that end, I shall be making an effort to be even more ridiculous than usual. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, wilsoncgp said:

I just thought it was worth pointing out that two people in my family, one in their 50s, one in their 80s, both believe they may have had COVID before there was a declared case in this country. A combination of factors could lead this to being plausible, largely the fact that we just don't know enough to be sure either way.

I'm a bit sceptical it was COVID, because we are led to believe it should be incredibly deadly to those in their 80s, because nobody but these 2 people in our extended family suffered from it, amongst other reasons. But just because it's deadly doesn't mean that this wasn't quite a mild case for someone in their 80s or that the rest of the family has had it but also had a very mild unrecognisable illness. Unlikely it was COVID but hey, who really knows right now.

I don't think it's 'incredibly deadly' to the elderly or underlying illnessed. 

From the numbers I've seen, the mortality is 'only' around 10% death rate for elderly or ill people who get it. Still not great, but it's not a certain death sentence.

 

Like you, some poeple in my family think they have had it already. My parents both had horrible coughs over winter. Probably just wishful thinking that they've already had it, but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, boro-unger said:

From the numbers I've seen, the mortality is 'only' around 10% death rate for elderly or ill people who get it.

Who test positive for it.  It's entirely possible that people have had it, not been tested and have come through it ok and that includes older people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Changing Times said:

Who test positive for it.  It's entirely possible that people have had it, not been tested and have come through it ok and that includes older people.

On the flipside of that, people could have had it, passed away and not been tested for it. So there's a very real possibility that the mortality rate could be higher, but also just as likely to be much lower too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally in my opinion it is highly plausible that this virus has been in the country for 3-6 months already. The symptoms are so similar to a standard bad cold or flu, that it is possible a mass outbreak could have already happened and we were simply not aware. 

I seem to recall it was common knowledge at the back end of December that there was a new disease emerging. Since then look how far it has spread.

Say this has been bubbling away in China since September, by December it would have already been as widespread as it is now (if not more). The particularly bad flu that was going round, over Christmas and New Year, could well have been this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Borodane said:

You're both kidding right?

China is backwards on so many levels in the modern society. Their basic human rights are appalling and if you think they've done a good job regarding the virus then I suggest you watch some of the documentaries that are online. China has basically done everything wrong that they could. Doctors were hauled into police questioning for discussing a potential new virus long before it became public, people are being dragged away by police in the streets on the suspicion of being infected and journalists have gone missing as they documented the horrific actions of the chinese government and footage of police wealding buildings shut so people could be contained with no medical help and being left deal with the virus/die on their own. The dead were left in hospital aisels for days and medical staff were breaking down in front of cameras because the governemt were busier trying to contain the news rather than dealing with the problem. If you think China has done even a remotely good job then I don't think you've seen everything that's been going on. But I suppose if you think a dictatorship/communist government with no human rights is commendable then by all means feel free.

And to think I can't have that view because we were a Viking nation thousands of years ago is just baffling. China being the cradle of civilisation does not automatically mean they are a modern society today.

I have visited China on business and can vouch they are far more civilized and business oriented then you give then credit for. They are very good hosts and I thoroughly enjoyed my stay and learnt a great deal about lean and JIT operations. 
There may be some truth in some of what you state but the  media and activists love to paint bad pictures, come on your better than that. 

Edited by sanddancer
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DanFromDownSouth said:

On the flipside of that, people could have had it, passed away and not been tested for it. So there's a very real possibility that the mortality rate could be higher, but also just as likely to be much lower too.

I suspect people who pass away at this moment in time are likely to be tested for it as a matter of course so I don't believe that is a real possibility, mate.  Obviously anything before the virus emerged could be a different story, depending on where the person passed away, but the figures now should be pretty accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Changing Times said:

Obviously anything before the virus emerged could be a different story, depending on where the person passed away, but the figures now should be pretty accurate.

Sorry I was meaning anyone before the end of Jan in UK (alledged first cases in the UK were back end of Jan). I think it's a certainty that anyone that passes will be tested now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Posts

    • A Cardiff v West Brom H Huddersfield v Blackburn H Hull v Blackpool D Middlesbrough v Sheffield Utd A Preston v Stoke H QPR v Birmingham H Barnsley v Nottingham Forest D Derby v Reading H Fulham v Swansea H Luton v Coventry D Millwall v Bristol City A Peterbrough v Bournemouth
    • While we have a regressive Manager playing regressive football which as you say is the complete opposite to us except that when I actually type it it looks real scary. A regressive Manager playing regressive football. How bad can it get and where is it going to take us?  
    • Our fixtures become interesting after Sheffield United. Away to Hull next Saturday then we have a run of Home games to Peterborough and Barnsley then Away to Cardiff, Warnock's old Club who are struggling (although not quite as bad as ourselves), Home to Birmingham, Away to Luton before we go to the Hawthorns to face the Baggies on the 6th Nov. We then have two consecutive Home games against Millwall and Preston before a trip to Huddersfield on the 27th November. On paper there are some very "winnable" games amongst that lot so would it be fair to let Warnock have that run to save himself and get things back on track or is it too risky to let the performances continue and see those potential points frittered away like we have all year? It could be argued that it would be reasonable to give him those games but the reality is that we are seeing nothing that gives us any reason whatsoever that Warnock has a grip and is going to tun it around. There has been little logic, shape or reason as to how he sets his sides up. Our defence is as poor as I have seen from a Boro side in a long time. If we were solid at the back, keeping clean sheets while boring us to death there would at least be some merit in his thinking but porous doesn't begin to describe us. Our Midfield is a disjointed mess, they cant cover and shield the defence and they can't set up attacking passages of play. They seem to run around chasing back (or more likely chasing their man to mark) after we lose possession or running up chasing long punts, then running back again, then running up again meanwhile adding little of merit or quality. It's clear that it is due to tactics rather than them all being useless (including Howson in fairness). Their passing and ball retention is painful to watch rendering them a weak and ineffective unit regardless of personnel. The fact that we are lamenting the loss of a fairly basic clogger in Morsy illustrates just how desperate we have sunk and how low our expectations now are. Attack? I can only chuckle at the thought of us actually looking like we can attack and record efforts be they on or off target. With just about zero threat or opportunities, bereft of any quality of service we look hopeless.  Ikpeazu can be a real handful and Sporar has class yet neither seem to be effective in a Warnock side.  We have played many teams already with far fewer resources than Warnock has at his disposal and have been found wanting on each and every occasion with the exception of bottom of the table Forest who immediately sacked their Manager. Derby are a basket case and a collection of journeymen players and Rooney's nous (Rooney and nous in the same sentence is something I thought I would never be typing) but they comfortably nullified Warnock. Mark Robbins and Coventry (with their own set of off field issues for years) and limited budget of a side bettered us with ease. Reading with an inexperienced Keeper (not that it mattered as his Kit won't need to have been washed by the end of all that added time), and a defence consisting of midfielders square pegged into a makeshift defence kept us at bay with such ease it was demoralising. Then there was Blackpool and copy and paste. A terrible disorganised Defence, a Midfield that seemingly has a confused purpose and an Attack that rarely if ever threatens leaves me with little reason for optimism. I'm not even sure where to begin in terms of sorting it all out as it is so far off the ideal in every single department that it is scary as to how bad we have become and how likely it is to continue unabated because there are absolutely no signs of something clicking or even just misfiring. It's the dampest of damp squibs. Its like the end of Strachan and Mogga all over, all the signs are glaringly obvious and I suspect the players must think the same despite them being "a smashing bunch of lads really". If SG made a change now it could get worse but by how much? If he doesn't it could get better but again by how much? Weighing everything up I can't see anything to suggest anything but more of the same for the last quarter of the year and by that time we could be lamenting more lost points against mediocre to poor sides and seriously deep in relegation territory. Hull and Peterborough will be looking at their fixtures against us and seeing them as winnable six pointers, this against a side that had the Play Offs as the target only a few weeks back.    
    • Warnock shouldn't abuse referees. But I don't think boro fans should be calling our manager expletives online. It makes us all look silly. I imagine if we beat Sheffield United 3-0 then nobody will be calling him a p**** then. He won't be here much longer.
    • Our performances have been so bad this season that I now think Warnock leaving is the best thing all round. Our midfield hasn't been fit for purpose for most of this season as Warnock doesn't know how to get the best out of the players at his disposal. If the going gets tough then I doubt Warnock will dig his heels in to stick around for a mid-table at best kind of season, so I'm sure there's a good chance that he'll leave if there isn't an upturn in results soon. There's two more games against Sheffield United (home) and Hull City (away) before the next international break - which would be a good time to make a managerial change - so our results before then could decide whether Warnock leaves or not. Whilst Crooks has probably been our best performing central midfielder this season, I think him him being part of any three man midfield, especially with Warnock's direct tactics, massively reduces our fluidity in possession and just leads to our midfield three not functioning to anywhere near an acceptable standard. Last season we were far more fluid in possession without a unique "Warnock style" midfielder like Crooks. Something has dramatically changed in midfield from last season as we've got so much worse. I don't think the goals he has provided has been worth the negatives. Any three from Howson, Morsy, Saville and Tavernier last season performed to a far higher and consistent standard than any three this season so far. I can see the positives that Crooks adds to the team in a midfield role such as him pushing forward from midfield to be a targetman for flick-ons from Lumley's long kicks, and a very good aerial presence in both boxes in open play and set-pieces. However, aside from them, I think he really limits us as a team as the ball doesn't flow well with him in there. With three central midfielders we should be far more patient on the ball and allow our shape to open up far more with fullbacks overlapping, wide midfielder having a more infield position and midfielders playing through the thirds with quality. Instead everything in midfield is disjointed, messy and scrappy for us - with minimal quality as a unit. We've played our best football this season in the home game against Blackburn with Howson, Morsy and Tavernier in a midfield three - with Crooks playing as a targetman in strike. Kieran Scott must be tearing his hair out after watching how smoothly Norwich's midfield in their two promotion seasons move the ball around and progress it into the forward areas. Siliki and Payero both still adapting to the Championship won't help matters either. Whatever the cause is, the problem of the midfield is abundantly clear so it needs to be resolved as soon as possible.

×
×
  • Create New...